Fastening, Joining & Assembly Blog

Fastening, Joining & Assembly

The Fastening, Joining and Assembly Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about fasteners and hardware, design for assembly, adhesives and sealants, and welding and joining technologies. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: Would Design for Disassembly Be a Welcomed Change?   Next in Blog: Fume Exposure from Welding
Close
Close
Close
4 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

EPA Links Formaldehyde & Cancer

Posted April 13, 2011 3:26 PM by Sharkles

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has begun the process of getting formaldehyde classified as a known human carcinogen. Formaldehyde's current classification as a "probable human carcinogen" has been in place since 1987. The EPA's current review of the compound is the first since 1998.

The first review of the EPA's draft assessment was recently reviewed by the National Academies of Science's National Research Council (NRC). The assessment confirmed that formaldehyde can lead to cancer of the nose, nasal cavity, and throat.

This news has not been well-received by industry players who have rallied Congress to slow the reclassification process to a near halt. Since formaldehyde is used in a wide array of industrial and consumer products, this would require a major overall by manufacturers.

International chemical research firm, ICIS, estimates that nearly two-thirds of the market for the compound is for resins used to make construction materials. It is also commonly found in plastics, foams, adhesives, and sealants that are used in electronics, automotive, and consumer goods.

Where do you stand on the reclassification of formaldehyde as a known carcinogen?

Source: Environmental Working Group

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1294
Good Answers: 35
#1

Re: EPA Links Formaldehyde & Cancer

04/13/2011 4:45 PM

If it's a known carcinogen, it should be classified as a known carcinogen.

Is there any reason to doubt the EPA's or the NRC's assessment?

Is the phrase "can lead to cancer" the so far accepted criteria for calling something a known carcinogen?

If it is not labeled as a known carcinogen, will it be any less carcinogenic?

If it is labeled a known carcinogen, will it be banned, or will there (just) be requirements for precautions in its use?

Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 331
Good Answers: 10
#4
In reply to #1

Re: EPA Links Formaldehyde & Cancer

04/14/2011 8:37 AM

"If it is labeled a known carcinogen, will it be banned, or will there (just) be requirements for precautions in its use?"

Take a look at the requirements for benzene. I would assume that formadehyde will have similar requirements. Industry still uses benzene in many applications. You can go to TRIme web and search for companies using it under the Community Right to Know Act.

__________________
"We cannot sow thistles and reap clover. Nature simply does not run things that way. She goes by cause and effect." Napoleon Hill
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Tamilnadu, India
Posts: 836
Good Answers: 42
#2

Re: EPA Links Formaldehyde & Cancer

04/14/2011 2:01 AM

Formaldehyde is a wonder ingredient in Resin Industry. The best thing to deal this is about taking care of residual HCHO emissions or choosing other aldehydes.

__________________
Nature is so graceful and naked. Human possession is ridiculous.
Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 12
Good Answers: 1
#3
In reply to #2

Re: EPA Links Formaldehyde & Cancer

04/14/2011 2:32 AM

A Complete bann will not be practical. Still the usage of formaldehyde can be eliminated at least from the manufacturing of pet bottles, food containers, baby bottles etc.

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 4 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

PowerG (1); rhkramer (1); s.udhayamarthandan (1); WWkayaker (1)

Previous in Blog: Would Design for Disassembly Be a Welcomed Change?   Next in Blog: Fume Exposure from Welding

Advertisement