OH CR4P! Blog

OH CR4P!

"An expert is a man who has made all the mistakes, which can be made, in a very narrow field." -Niels Bohr

These words frame the OH CR4P! blog, a place which encourages engineers to discuss, reminisce, and learn about mistakes, failures and mishaps made by those who have become "experts" the hard way.

Previous in Blog: Genetic Engineering Gone Wrong   Next in Blog: Minneapolis Bridge Collapse – A Complacency Problem
Close
Close
Close
5 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Costly Quick Fix - Flixborough Disaster 1974

Posted January 17, 2012 10:32 AM by cheme_wordsmithy
Pathfinder Tags: accident chemical disaster explosion

An explosion roughly equivalent to 15 tonnes (16.5 tons or 33000 pounds) of TNT was the price a chemical plant paid for a shoddy temporary fix.

The Nypro chemical factory, located in the small town of Flixborough, Lincolnshire, was set up in 1969 to provide caprolactam, a base ingredient for the production of Nylon in the UK. According to reports, residents of Flixborough were not happy with its installation so close to their homes, and their expressed safety concerns were made a reality years later.

The Incident

On June 1, 1974, a temporary bypass pipe was ruptured. The pipe was connected to tanks containing cyclohexane, and within a minute, 40 tonnes of the plant's 400 tonne store of cyclohexane leaked from the pipe, forming a vapor

cloud 320-650 feet in diameter. After coming in contact with an ignition source, the cloud exploded, destroying the plant and damaging some 1,800 buildings within a mile radius of the site. A BBC news coverage video provides a glimpse of the aftermath.

The disaster, which occurred on a weekend, killed 28 plant workers and injured

36 others. Observers indicated that, had the explosion happened on a weekday, more than 500 employees could have died.

An extensive news report covered by BBC news details the events and the reactions of some of the affected residents.

(Image left): The Nypro plant, post-explosion.

The Cause

The accident was due to the faulty construction of a temporary bypass pipe. More than two months prior to the incident, a vertical crack in reactor No. 5 was discovered to be leaking cyclohexane. As the tanks were designed in series, a bypass line was made to connect the No. 4 and No. 6 reactors. The faulty and hasty modification was made with limited calculations on its structural integrity. No calculations were undertaken to account for its dog-legged shape, and no drawing of the proposal was formally produced.

The Effect

The effect on British industry after the disaster was significant. The Times newspaper reported on November 12, 1975 that the loss of the plant put 35,000 jobs at risk and cost the UK around €60 million in imports.

Coincidently, the Nypro plant (against the protests of residents) began reconstruction in 1976, although it closed just two years later after a large drop in the price of Nylon due to recession.

Lessons Learned?

The Flixborough disaster was an example of the risks associated with design and system modification made without thorough assessment. The bypass line installed in the plant was made quickly, likely in order to minimize the costs and losses associated with suspended plant operation.

Time constraints which result in quick fixes are unfortunately common in all kinds of situations, albeit on a smaller scale. The pressure to finish a job or provide a finished product often supersedes the priority of doing it right or to its full potential, especially when the consequences of a late project fall on the heads of only a few individuals.

Have you been a part of or witnessed any projects where "quick fixes" had some undesirable consequences?

Sources:

Health & Safety Executive

NZ Safety Council - Flixborough - UK

Image Source:

AcuTech Consulting

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#1

Re: Costly Quick Fix - Flixborough Disaster 1974

01/17/2012 10:45 AM

There was another lesson learned, though:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inherent_safety

Further reading.

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United Kingdom - Member - New Member

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harlow England
Posts: 16512
Good Answers: 670
#2

Re: Costly Quick Fix - Flixborough Disaster 1974

01/17/2012 11:20 AM

Note:- There is no truth in the rumour that the man who authorised the botched repair changed jobs to become the captain of an Italian cruise liner.
Del

__________________
health warning: These posts may contain traces of nut.
Reply Off Topic (Score 7)
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Costly Quick Fix - Flixborough Disaster 1974

01/17/2012 12:10 PM

Baaaaaaaaaaaad kitty! Go and sit on the naughty step.

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Atchison Village
Posts: 383
Good Answers: 39
#4
In reply to #2

Re: Costly Quick Fix - Flixborough Disaster 1974

01/17/2012 11:11 PM

Or that the cruise ship company was aware of his little sight-seeing deviations to Isola Giglio...

__________________
Align culture with nature...
Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: North West England
Posts: 1170
Good Answers: 153
#5

Re: Costly Quick Fix - Flixborough Disaster 1974

01/18/2012 5:29 AM

I have a lot of clients in the process and chemical industries. Some of them occasionally ask me to do work arounds that in my opinion would to cut corners on safety. The mere mention of Flixborough usually brings them back into line. But I use Bhopal and Chernobyl as back up arguments if Flixborough doesn't work.

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 5 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

jhhassociates (1); ormondotvos (1); PWSlack (2); user-deleted-1105 (1)

Previous in Blog: Genetic Engineering Gone Wrong   Next in Blog: Minneapolis Bridge Collapse – A Complacency Problem

Advertisement