Biomedical Engineering Blog

Biomedical Engineering

The Biomedical Engineering blog is the place for conversation and discussion about topics related to engineering principles of the medical field. Here, you'll find everything from discussions about emerging medical technologies to advances in medical research. The blog's owner, Chelsey H, is a graduate of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) with a degree in Biomedical Engineering.

Previous in Blog: Color-Coded Surgery: Lighting the Way for Surgeons   Next in Blog: A Solution For Stress
Close
Close
Close
6 comments
Rating: Comments: Nested

Getting Organ Recipients Off Drugs

Posted March 19, 2012 12:00 AM by Chelsey H

Everyday an average of 79 people receive an organ transplant. Organ transplantation is a widely used medical treatment for patients with failing organs; but while the possibility of growing new organs gets closer every day, the 113,433 people on the organ waiting list can't wait for that breakthrough. Instead they have to rely on the generosity and unfortunately, often times the tragedy of others. The organ recipients then spend the rest of their life on immunosuppressant drugs which have a host of side effects including high blood pressure, diabetes, infections, and cancer. A new "cocktail' of cells may aid the post-treatment of organ recipients. By mixing the immune system of the donor and recipient, patients can live without immunosuppressants.

Image credit: dailytech.com

The Problem

Immunosuppressant drugs, also known as Anti-rejection medications, stop the body from rejecting the transplanted organ. They prevent the recipient body from killing the new organ as a foreign invader but they also suppress the patient's own immune system to the point where they can't fight off the bacteria and germs they face every day. Even though organs are closely matched before the transplant, rejection of a new organ can happen quickly or over a long period of time, (also known as chronic rejection). There are many different types of drugs available, but they all act by blocking the immune system so it is less likely to react against the transplanted organ. There are three main immunosuppressant drugs.

· Cyclosporins, which inhibit T-cell activations, thus preventing T-cells from attacking the transplanted organ.

· Azathioprines, which disrupt the syntheses of DNA and RNA and cell division.

· Cortiosteroids, which suppress the inflammation associated with transplant rejection.

Patients are usually prescribed a combination of the drugs listed above after their transplant. And while the doses and combination might change, most patients will be on at least one for the rest of their lives.

The transplant can also fail in patients who were well matched and took all the pills, which can cost up to $25,000 a year.

The Study

The new study was reported on March 7th in Science Translational Medicine and led by Suzan Ildstad at the Institute for Cellual Therapeutics at the University of Lousiville in Kentucky. The report shows a way to better organ acceptance and minimize the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). GVHD is a potentially lethal condition in which the donor's immune system may attack the recipient's body. The clinical trial was conducted at Northwestern University in Chicago. During the study, Ilstad and colleagues extracted bone marrow-producing cells from kidney donors. Then the cells that likely cause GVHD were removed and the number of 'facilitating cells", which make and organ recipient's system more receptive, were expanded. The trial used eight patients with severe kidney disease and had taken radiation and drug treatment to suppress their immune system. The radiation and drug treatment is used to 'condition' the body by suppressing the recipient's bone marrow so the donor's cells have room to grow. The patients then each received a kidney from a genetically mismatched relative or unrelated donor; the concoction of donor cells, a bioengineering mobilized product enriched for hematopoietic stem cells and tolerogenic graft facilitating cells, was given a day later.

The donor's immune cells almost completely took over the recipient's immune system, but the new immune system didn't attack the recipient's body. In addition, the body didn't reject the transplanted organ. Of the eight recipients, five were completely off immunosuppressants, with no sign of GVHD, within a year. Their new kidneys have continued to function well for an additional 18 months.

According to Ildstad, the treatment increases the recipient's regulatory T-Cells that serve as 'peacekeepers' by keeping the immune system in balance. "The preliminary results from this ongoing study are exciting and may have a major impact on organ transplantation in the future," said Joseph Leventhal, MD, PhD, transplant surgeon at Northwestern Memorial Hospital and associate professor of surgery and director of kidney and pancreas transplantation at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine. "With refinement, this approach may prove to be applicable to the majority of patients receiving the full spectrum of solid organ transplants."

Image Credit

There are still some drawbacks; replacing the immune system is a drastic step and there is still a chance that GVHD could develop in the future. Since the facilitating cells are patented, the method for producing them is not fully described in the paper making it difficult for other researchers to reproduce the findings to ensure reproducibility of the experiment and consistency in the treatment.

Resources

The Need Is Real: Data- organdonor.gov

Organ Transplantation: The Process- organdonor.gov

Immunosuppressant Drugs- medical-dictionary.com

Northwestern Memorial Hospital. "Doing Away With Anti-Rejection Medication." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 9 Mar. 2012. Web.

15 Mar. 2012. <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/242635.php>

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru
Hobbies - CNC - New Member Popular Science - Biology - New Member Hobbies - Musician - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 3523
Good Answers: 146
#1

Re: Getting Organ Recipients Off Drugs

03/19/2012 6:15 PM

Sounds pretty sick to me.

The smart money is on tissue engineering: no more 'donors', no more rejection problems, no more anti-rejection drugs - or treatments.

Use the recipient's own cells to grow, or '3-D print', the tissue or organ they need. This is not a remote possibility, it is a near future development already on track, and not even expensive to get in on the ground floor. (Imagine, $150,000 for a prototype printer that is already producing blood vessels and connective tissues - perfectly matched to the patient.)

The crazy and desperate money is on innovative ways to screw up the patient's immune system so they can get the needed organ in the nearest alleyway.

__________________
incus opella
Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Active Contributor

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 18
Good Answers: 1
#2

Re: Getting Organ Recipients Off Drugs

03/20/2012 12:11 PM

THIS IS HUGE! I can NOT overemphasize how important this is! Nobel worthy, IF it bears empiric reproducing and is SAFE.

It will impact all manner of transplants and the HUGE field of auto immune diseases: arthritis alzheimers parkinsons multiple sclerosis. I have close family with auto immune arthritis and it's hear wrenching to see.

IF they can REGULATE the immune response so profoundly by "amplifying" or "expanding" the 'facilitating cells" or " regulatory T-Cells ", enough to take a MISMATCHED organ, then it should be easy to regulate your OWN mis firing auto immune response, no?

Question1: do they amplify a donor's regulatory T-Cells/facilitating cells or the recipients own regulatory t-cells? that bit is a little confusing.

Question2: will this get caught up in a "stem cell" debate? I note that the pharma biomed community has NOT yet brought us any breakthroughs in the "cell" area due to "stem cell" concerns. Now this may be with connivance of the pharma industry, but it seems like stem cell field is not yet commercially available.

Is there a link to this article without having to pay $75?(travesty of academic brahmins in society).

Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 272
Good Answers: 1
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Getting Organ Recipients Off Drugs

03/20/2012 1:20 PM

Hi! Thank you for your comment!

You answer to question 1: The procedure initially amplifies the donor's facilitating cells to make the recipient's system more receptive. At the end of the study, one researcher said that the treatment actually increased the recipient's own regulatory T cells.

Question 2: It's always hard to say with the stem cell debate. This study took hematopoietic stem cells which are found in the bone marrow of adults so there is a little less controversy about the source of the stem cells. Stem cells are being heavily research and while I don't think they are going to be commercially available soon researchers have made several breakthrough treatments using adult or umbilical stem cells.

Unfortunately I was unable to find a free version of the article but the sources I use do a pretty good job of summing it up.

__________________
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.” Albert Einstein
Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 18
Good Answers: 1
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Getting Organ Recipients Off Drugs

03/20/2012 7:46 PM

Thanks.

I guess that's the clever bit, that it is the donor's facilitating cells which are key to the non-rejection. So if i get this correctly, more than an organ transplant, this procedure is an entire "immune system transplant" too: the recipient not only gets the donor's kidney but the donors' immune cells too! what a strange and non-intuitive technique!

Another fascinating bit: "Since the facilitating cells are patented" ?! Did they patent our own facilitating T-Cells? who owns that patent?

Reply
Guru
United States - Member - Lifelong New Yorker Popular Science - Biology - Animal Science Technical Fields - Technical Writing - Technical Writer

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 2313
Good Answers: 59
#5
In reply to #2

Re: Getting Organ Recipients Off Drugs

03/21/2012 11:21 AM

I agree, this could also be beneficial those who have autoimmune disorders. (For example, immuno-suppresive drugs like CellCept are often prescribed for lupus.) Many of these disorders have a similarity to problems with transplants - except the immune system rejects parts of the body's own self.

Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 18
Good Answers: 1
#6
In reply to #5

Re: Getting Organ Recipients Off Drugs

03/21/2012 11:31 AM

caveat: Big Pharma = Big Money = financial "interests" deeply intermingled into the research phase itself:

"Since the facilitating cells are patented, the method for producing them is not fully described in the paper making it difficult for other researchers to reproduce the findings to ensure reproducibility of the experiment and consistency in the treatment"

imagine if Isaac Newton's patrons patented F=M*a.! Imagine The Royal Society (from Newton's time) would have published a similar blurb as this article....sacrilege, but accepted in our world.

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 6 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

artsmith (1); Chelsey H (1); kiers (3); SavvyExacta (1)

Previous in Blog: Color-Coded Surgery: Lighting the Way for Surgeons   Next in Blog: A Solution For Stress

Advertisement