OH CR4P! Blog

OH CR4P!

"An expert is a man who has made all the mistakes, which can be made, in a very narrow field." -Niels Bohr

These words frame the OH CR4P! blog, a place which encourages engineers to discuss, reminisce, and learn about mistakes, failures and mishaps made by those who have become "experts" the hard way.

Previous in Blog: Oppau Explosion – Ammonium Nitrate’s Deadly Beginning   Next in Blog: Failed Military Designs - Aircraft
Close
Close
Close
4 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

The Problem of ESD

Posted June 20, 2012 2:00 PM by cheme_wordsmithy

If you've ever ordered computer hardware or any electronic part, you likely received it in an anti-static bag. This special type of packaging is exactly what its name implies, a means to protect against static electricity; specifically electrostatic discharge, or ESD

(Credit: PC Guide) -->

Electrostatic discharge, or ESD, has been a safety and productivity issue in industry for many, many years. It has been the culprit behind numerous explosions as well as countless product failures and defects in solid state electronics.

What Is ESD?

ESD is the release of static electricity from one object to another. Most people know it as the sparks induced by the Van de Graaff generator in science class, or the shocks they gave their friends after scuffing their feet across the carpet or rubbing a balloon on their head. The sparks are the result of a difference in electric potential between the two objects in contact (Credit: Industrial Plastic Supply, Inc. -->). The charge difference is created through friction, known as the triboelectric effect.

(The magical effects of static electricity. Credit: thebeautybrains.com)

ESD is not limited to sparks and shocks that we can feel, however. It also can come in more subtle forms, namely invisible corona or brush discharges which occur in the presence of highly curved electrodes. These are the ESD events that plague production efforts in electronics manufacturing and industry. A majority of the defects aren't realized until they reach the customer, and resulting costs can be high.

Prevention and Control

Preventing ESD events and the resulting damage requires engineers to consider the potential for charge buildup in an area or part, and the electrostatic sensitivity of components.

In regards to electrostatic sensitivity, studies have been done to determine the cost effectiveness of increasing ESD resistance of manufactured products. In most cases, profits do not improve above an effective resistance of 4 kV HBM (per Human Body Model). Unfortunately, many components lose performance as ESD resistance is increased, so a compromise is often required.

Manufacturers also can define an EPA (electrostatic protective area) for areas workstations where ESD prevention is critical. In these areas all conductive materials are grounded, workers are grounded, and charge build-up on sensitive products is prevented. Grounding (connection of an object to earth) helps limit and dissipate any charge buildup in an object that may otherwise have the potential to induce an ESD event. Connection to ground is important for preventing ESD in any application or setting, not just for electronics.

ESDs and Explosions

ESD is a particular nuisance for electronics, but what about applications involving explosive materials? A lack of understanding or consideration for static buildup could have devastating results in these situations, where it takes only a small spark to make for a very bad day.

(Cell phones may not be dangerous at the pump, but an unusual high static buildup could be. <-- Credit: ESD Journal)

Such was the case at the Barton Solvents facility in Valley Center, Kansas. According to the Chemical Safety Board (CSB), at about 8:30 am on July 17, a tanker unloaded a non-conductive solvent through a feed leading to one of the facilities storage tanks. A device for measuring the liquid level in the tank, suspended from pulleys and connected to a metal float, was connected to a grounded metal tape assembly. When air entered the line during the filling of the tank, it caused turbulence which rocked the assembly's loose connections and created a space between the float and the linkage assembly. The charge that had built up in the liquid caused a spark to arch in the gap, igniting the flammable vapors from the solvent.

The explosion set off a chain reaction through a number of adjacent storage tanks, and the tops of some of the tanks became projectiles which caused offsite property damage in addition to extensive on-site destruction. The incident destroyed 36 storage tanks of over 660,000 pounds of chemicals, and resulted in an evacuation order for residents in the area.

(Credit: CSB.gov -->)

While this is the CSB's best guess, the actual details of what caused the explosion are unknown. Regardless, the case is an example of the potential dangers of ESDs when volatile compounds are present. In these situations, proper understanding and control of ESDs is essential for ensuring safety. In industries where ESD is mostly a quality assurance concern, better design and operating techniques could mean substantial cost savings and less instances of catastrophic or latent product failure.

References

ESDA.org

The "Real" Cost of ESD Damage - In Compliance Magazine

Electrostatic Discharge Explained - Electronicspub.com

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru

Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1753
Good Answers: 59
#1

Re: The Problem of ESD

06/21/2012 12:26 AM

Yes, such things do happen. But, taking a page from well run fireworks and industrial facilities, it does not have to happen, or at least it ought to be limited to one tank.

For starter, those use wide spread, earth covered bunkers, separated by high berms. To cut the spreading of trouble.

But, that takes learning from seemingly other industries.

Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#2

Re: The Problem of ESD

06/21/2012 4:31 AM

A word of caution.

  • If one puts up a metal lightning conductor above a building, one would not be surprised if an ESD happens preferentially onto the lighning conductor.
  • So, if one puts a metal lightning conductor earthed rod into a non-conductive fluid, one should not be surprised if the same sort of thing happens there.

Static build-up in non-conductive fluids can be minimised by keeping pipe velocities low.

Explosions in vessels containing flammable non-conductive fluids can be minimised by excluding oxygen from the vessel.

There are established standards regarding the separation of tanks and fire protection systems for them; from the fire picture in the original posting, it would appear that the facility was constructed before the standards were established.

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Reply
Guru
Hobbies - DIY Welding - Don't Know What Made The Old Title Attractive... Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United States - US - Statue of Liberty - 60 Year Member

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Yellowstone Valley, in Big Sky Country
Posts: 7425
Good Answers: 295
#3
In reply to #2

Re: The Problem of ESD

06/21/2012 11:33 AM

"... from the fire picture in the original posting, it would appear that the facility was constructed before the standards were established."

July 2007 explosion and fire at the Barton Solvents distribution facility in Valley Center, Kansas, USA. Link to CSB report. Doesn't tell us when the facility was constructed, so you may be correct.

__________________
Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#4

Re: The Problem of ESD

06/28/2012 6:53 PM

The real story here is potential.

How you take that new electronic part out of the bag and install it in the machine is the most important step in ESD control.

Until you, the bag and part, and the PC are all at the same potential the chances of frying one of those TINY junctions is real. This is lost on many.

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 4 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Doorman (1); leveles (1); lyn (1); PWSlack (1)

Previous in Blog: Oppau Explosion – Ammonium Nitrate’s Deadly Beginning   Next in Blog: Failed Military Designs - Aircraft

Advertisement