Sorry, wrong. If you want to protect a ship, the first thing is to deny the other side the ability to find it or at least to know what you are bringing. Until drones came along, a lot of this recon was by fighter jet (sure, satellites, IF you had them AND they were in the right place at the right time AND if they weren't obscured by weather). Stealing the other side's eyes IS a good use of a limited laser system.
If you have the ability to use it as an anti-missile system, so much the better. My two issues with lasers as missile defense is that directed energy weapons are all line-of-sight -- surface skimming attackers limit the vulnerability of attackers and possibly the detection/reaction time (yes, if you have a radar plane spotting...); the other issue is cycle rate, if it is too long, you can saturate the ships defenses. Yes that is an issue that exists for missile-type anti-missile systems too (made worse by ammunition limits), but if in defending the ship, you leave it dead in the water, or you boil energy production/storage system, it is less than ideal.
Yes, missile carrying drones allow a snap shot upon detection/targeting. I am not up on current capabilities, but I don't think that drones carry missiles heavy enough to endanger any but the smallest of ships, still it doesn't take much to damage exposed systems like radar antennae on a missile cruiser or exposed aircraft on a carrier deck. Hopefully, the watch crew isn't asleep going into a situation where such an attack is possible, but it might be tried. A sea-skimming missle is slightly more likely to sneak thru than a high-flying drone on reconnaisance, but I can see a missle keeping a crew's attention for a short time to allow a drone more observation time. A fast reacting crew with an energy weapon that can wake up and cycle fast enough is a very good answer to events like that. A powerful beam weapon SHOULD be able to destroy a light target like a drone from a far enough distance to minimize the information sent to the drone's command.