Electronic Test Equipment Blog Blog

Electronic Test Equipment Blog

The Electronic Test Equipment Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about test instruments, board & assembly test, inspection & test, test equipment, and anything else related to the electronic testing field. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: Can We Still Compete for Technology?   Next in Blog: 'Wire' Products Failing?
Close
Close
Close
5 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

More Automotive Electronics to Test

Posted June 05, 2007 3:05 PM by Steve Melito

A Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) conference recently learned that in less than 10 years, wireless communication devices and wireless sensor networks will comprise a larger share of an increasing number of automotive electronics products. Delphi predicts that new electronics will be used in five areas: Wireless communication devices (traffic management systems, vehicle-to-vehicle communication products, vehicle-to-infrastructure communication devices, and vehicle-to-satellite systems); HMIs with driver aids for the elderly; Wireless sensor networks aimed at security and biometric applications; Low-power tracking (anti-kidnapping devices and energy-scavenging systems); and Services (homeland security and 24/7 security monitoring). What will this mean in terms of additional electronic test requirements?

The preceding article is a "sneak peek" from Electronic Test Equipment, a newsletter from GlobalSpec. To stay up-to-date and informed on industry trends, products, and technologies, subscribe to Electronic Test Equipment today.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 962
#1

Re: More Automotive Electronics to Test

05/23/2007 5:33 PM

It's not so much the testing that will be the issue. Where will the radio spectrum come from? How will un-intended interactions be avoided? What will happen when a device malfunctions and say sends out false data? Who is going to supervise all these things? How will these cope when a battery goes flat. An alternator goes faulty? Relying on too many devices could just prove too much to cope with. The number of fault indicators could need too much space on the dashboard. Do we rely too much on technology to get us out of trouble?

__________________
There's them that knows and them that just thinks they know, whitch are you? Stir the pot and see what rises up. I have catalytic properties I get a reaction going.
Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United Kingdom - Member - New Member

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harlow England
Posts: 16512
Good Answers: 670
#3
In reply to #1

Re: More Automotive Electronics to Test

06/06/2007 6:56 AM

Exactly!

We had a problem a few months back with some contaminated petrol.

There wasn't a REAL problem!

But the contamination screwed up the oxygen sensors in the exhaust so the engine management put the engines into automotive 'safe mode' and people had to spend big money on a new sensor!

Classic! Complicated to the point of uselessness!

__________________
health warning: These posts may contain traces of nut.
Reply
Anonymous Poster
#4
In reply to #1

Re: More Automotive Electronics to Test

06/19/2007 10:40 AM

One might anticipate the low power (short range) wireless interfaces (even off-vehicle) would be implementations of the IEEE 802.15.4 "Personal Area Network" (PAN) standard or perhaps the longer range, more powerful Zigbee protocol extension of PAN. These have various useful characteristics. Network implementation is ad hoc - called a "mesh" network. When a new node appears it is incorporated as a routine function of the ntework. No outside interaction required. Very powerful ability. Issues of latency are addressed and optimized. Stndby mode draws almost no current. PAN is narrow band but remarkably efficient. functionality is such that it allows registration of range between nodes - potentially useful in a mobile application. Range is maybe 100 feet. Intended that batteries will endure a period of years. Zigbee range is a mile or more. More bandwidth. More current load.

discussion: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.15.4

Details: http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/15/pub/TG4.html

Certainly, there are other opportunities.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Driver workload can be through automation and use of reasonably intelligent display, probably a flat panel, touch screen with heads up (on windshield) that provides only the information needed for the existing circumstance. Already used in top-end cars; long history in aircraft. first vestiges of true "auto-pilot" are showing up now as well.

the sensors, the network and control systems have been working their way into cars for decades.

Ever-increasing dependence on technology is not appealing, but seems inevitable.

r/

Sam H.

Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 89
Good Answers: 1
#2

Re: More Automotive Electronics to Test

05/24/2007 11:35 AM

The first great automotive invention was the electric starter since then the only one of merit was the alternator. All the rest are not needed. Why do car manufacturers thing and buyers also that a car has to be loaded with tons of accessories. I will give in to the addition of the seat belt but no more.

Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 381
Good Answers: 1
#5
In reply to #2

Re: More Automotive Electronics to Test

09/25/2007 6:43 PM

The cars I drive are quiet use and Automatic and have great Stereos in them to listen to music.

I do not miss the loud and awkward cars that took all of my attention and I could not enjoy a great song with my wife.

Those are great automotive inventions if you ask me?

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 5 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (1); BrainWave (1); dbdwoods (1); travelerengineer (1); user-deleted-1105 (1)

Previous in Blog: Can We Still Compete for Technology?   Next in Blog: 'Wire' Products Failing?

Advertisement