Power Generation and Distribution Blog Blog

Power Generation and Distribution Blog

The Power Generation and Distribution Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about electrical power generation, designing and installing power systems, high voltage power lines, power distribution, design & installation services, and anything else related to the power generation industry. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: Future Energy Sources 3.1.2 Hydrogen & Hydrides   Next in Blog: Future Energy Sources 3.1.3 Hydrogen from Oil
Close
Close
Close
16 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

States Battle Feds in Power War

Posted July 01, 2007 6:00 AM

National interest is served when power plants are built in low-cost areas, and when power from these plants is delivered where it is needed. But this cannot happen without extensive networks of power transmission lines. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the U.S. Department of Energy claim they have the right to force states to build certain transmission lines. Not surprisingly, states often disagree. It now appears that the Supreme Court may have to decide the matter. The test case could be the Arizona Corporation Commission's recent rejection of a new 231-mile, 500-kV transmission line from Arizona to California.

The preceding article is a "sneak peek" from Power Generation, a newsletter from GlobalSpec. To stay up-to-date and informed on industry trends, products, and technologies, subscribe to Power Generation today.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Member

Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5
#1

Re: States Battle Feds in Power War

07/02/2007 9:13 AM

One very good possible answer is a better siting of the plants and lines. Whether we like it or not, the best US energy supply is our coal reserves - with the best quality and quantity being found in the Powder River basin of Wyoming, Montana, and South Dakota. It seems to me that rather than mining and shipping this coal all over the country, as we do now, to old, inefficient power plants it would make more sense to build super large capacity, but very efficienct and eco-friendly, coal-fired plants right there at the mine source (and yes - it IS possible to eco-friendly coal power plants). As far as tranmission is concerned, the best way to distribute the huge amounts of power which would be generated at these plants is through HVDC (High Voltage Direct Current). There is less line loss than AC transmission lines, so again it is more efficient.

The benefits are the much easier and less expensive power plant siting costs in this area as well as the lower cost and more eco-friendly power porduction.

Reply
Power-User
Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member Technical Fields - Architecture - New Member

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bangalore India
Posts: 288
Good Answers: 3
#2
In reply to #1

Re: States Battle Feds in Power War

07/02/2007 11:11 PM

yes i agree with you but How and who will adress emission related issues with coal based thermal power plants and do you mean gas and fossiel based oil kings will close their eyes if cole based take over the Power plants?

crm

__________________
Run silent run deep
Reply
Member

Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5
#3
In reply to #2

Re: States Battle Feds in Power War

07/03/2007 7:15 AM

Coal is already the fuel of choice for well over 50% of our electric power generation, so put away your conspiracy theories about gas and oil kings. As far as emissions control, large coal plants such as these are actually very easy to build in such a way as to greatly lessen their carbon footprint: CO2 scrubbing, CO2 sequestering, coal gasification, ICGC technologyu, etc.

Reply
Participant

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2
#4
In reply to #3

Re: States Battle Feds in Power War

07/03/2007 9:11 AM

Tell that to TXU or whatever they are calling themselves now days. They are fighting tooth and nail to put in several NEW coal burners with OLD technology in Central Texas saying they are the newest technology. They are the dirtiest provider out there and they want to pollute our clean air in central Texas just for the almighty buck. Don't these people have any concise? Why do we all give in to the big corporations everytime they throw money at it?

Reply
Member

Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5
#6
In reply to #4

Re: States Battle Feds in Power War

07/03/2007 9:38 AM

Exactly the point, Jimmer. We need to site the plants near where the coal is mined - using the latest and greatest coal plant technology (which is very eco-friendly). Putting new plants in, with old technology, hundreds of miles from the mines is stupid.

Reply
Power-User
Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member Technical Fields - Architecture - New Member

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bangalore India
Posts: 288
Good Answers: 3
#8
In reply to #3

Re: States Battle Feds in Power War

07/04/2007 11:24 PM

yes coal based power plants are going to stay i know very well unless feds and states understand that& unless SELF appointed green gas &global worming advocate groops keep quiet and think techenicaly.as you rightly said set up the power plants right at the coalmines with adaquate measures to controal the emissions insted of sinking Bellions of $ for reinventing the wheel to controal emmissions form fossiel fuel based power plants which is impossiable. and wont be cost effective even fuels cells are not an answer as its going to cost a fartune.

crm

__________________
Run silent run deep
Reply
Anonymous Poster
#5
In reply to #1

Re: States Battle Feds in Power War

07/03/2007 9:37 AM

What would you use to convert DC to AC.

Reply
Member

Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5
#7
In reply to #5

Re: States Battle Feds in Power War

07/03/2007 9:41 AM

DC to AC inversion is existing technology already in use in several main transmission hubs.

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#9

Re: States Battle Feds in Power War

07/11/2007 3:31 PM

How about a really clean Power Plant NUCLEAR, and than you don't have to extract any of the coal which creatres a lot of polution itself...

Reply
Power-User
Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member Technical Fields - Architecture - New Member

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bangalore India
Posts: 288
Good Answers: 3
#10
In reply to #9

Re: States Battle Feds in Power War

07/11/2007 11:11 PM

yes you are 100% correct But that issue needs to be answered by oil companeys who controls governments in many countries whose very bread is at stakes if alternate fuels take over the energy market.then what will be the fate of OPEC and oil producing counteries.and their imports from so called advanced and developed nations what will be the value of Euro and Dollar in the international market.

__________________
Run silent run deep
Reply
Anonymous Poster
#11

Re: States Battle Feds in Power War

07/13/2007 11:11 AM

Why should people in CA get the benefit of less emissions while the poor saps in the rural coal areas have to put up with all the emmsisions. If people want power in CA let them build their own electrical sources in CA.

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#12

Re: States Battle Feds in Power War

07/13/2007 11:28 AM

Hi Guys,

Not that I know but could the overhead transmission cables which is the main point of the story be buried therefore reducing the impact on the look of the environment.

Reply
Power-User
United States - Member - NE, USA Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Engineering Fields - Aerospace Engineering - Engineering Fields - Electromechanical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 199
Good Answers: 6
#13
In reply to #12

Re: States Battle Feds in Power War

07/13/2007 11:55 AM

I don't remember off the top of my head if this type of cable is possible as an underground version. I want to say yes - however what I DO remember is that underground cables are also considered to have very significant environmental impact. It is just different. Instead of potentially getting birds zapped with the wires, there is potential for underground or even on-ground animals to interfere with the cables.

Remember also, the cable would have to get burried somehow - which would involve a massive excavation project.

Also, the cable is more likely to fail, and is more difficult to fix when it does.

Reply
Member

Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7
#14
In reply to #13

Re: States Battle Feds in Power War

07/13/2007 4:13 PM

Overhead versus underground is often a consideration for shorter and lower voltage lines in urban areas, but putting long lengths of high voltage lines u/g is very expensive.

This link will direct you to a good and mercifully brief discussion on the subject, but the bottom line is: "The cost to place new transmission lines underground is about 8 to 10 times the cost to build overhead lines."

http://www.scana.com/NR/rdonlyres/465E6534-2FFB-4069-BF84-81465AEEF887/0/Undergroundvs.pdf

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#15

Re: States Battle Feds in Power War

07/20/2007 2:12 PM

The issue is whether or not a state governing body can regulate what happens within its boundaries.

California has made the construction of new power generation facilities nearly impossible to build, through state regulations and commissions.

Arizona's commissioning body has opted reject the construction of a new interstate transmission line.

If the ruling rejecting interstate transmission lines is overturned, the courts would start a precedence allowing states bordering California to sue for the removal of regulations regarding the building of new power generating facilities. It would be in California's best interest for the Supreme Court to uphold Arizona's decision.

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Piney Flats, Tennessee
Posts: 1740
Good Answers: 23
#16

Re: States Battle Feds in Power War

08/06/2007 8:52 AM

I am still trying to understand why hydrogen power plant can come on line. $10,000 each for a small hydrogen generator process about 1 litier of hydrogen an hour. $10,000 more for a storge tank. Once filled buy a Power plant that will run off hydrogen and a Generator.

Approx $90,000 investment should produce 5 magwatts. I am assuming you own the 0peoperty where the plant is installed. Take the first checks from sales to buy back ed hydrogenators and brass tools you didn't have when building the orginal.

The only security problem is that the tank could be seen as a portiental hydrogen bobmb.

__________________
If you never do anything you never have problems.
Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 16 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (5); cajun (1); crm (3); dadw5boys (1); hugh3306 (4); JCase (1); Jimmer_9 (1)

Previous in Blog: Future Energy Sources 3.1.2 Hydrogen & Hydrides   Next in Blog: Future Energy Sources 3.1.3 Hydrogen from Oil

Advertisement