Engineering News Blog

Engineering News

Latest news of interest to engineers. Sourced from GlobalSpec's Engineering News

Previous in Blog: Rolls Royce Said To Be Developing Drone Cargo Ships   Next in Blog: Innovations: A Four-minute Explanation of Why Innovation is So Important to the United States
Close
Close
Close
4 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

15 Inaccuracies Found In Common Science Illustrations

Posted February 27, 2014 10:28 AM

From Neatorama:

There are limits to how well you can render a concept on paper, or in 2D, so science illustrations that are considered state-of-the-art are often somewhat inaccurate. Other science explanations have been simplified for students, and the simplification sticks in our heads. They also stick in our textbooks, often for decades after new information is available! Michael Stevens from Vsauce guest-hosts this week's mental floss video. He explains some of the details you should know about classic science illustrations. The scale model of the solar system that he references can be found here.

Watch the video

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
Engineering Fields - Optical Engineering - Member Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Member Engineering Fields - Systems Engineering - Member

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Trantor
Posts: 5363
Good Answers: 647
#1

Re: 15 Inaccuracies Found In Common Science Illustrations

03/01/2014 4:02 PM

I don't get why people who have this urge to explain science also have the urge to 'embellish' what they are saying, and in this case to screw-up the 'corrections' they are trying to make. These 4 explanations are, well, either wrong or pointless.

1. The electron surrounding an atom is best described as a standing wave. The wave is the electron and the electron is the wave. The explanation given in the video just makes a murky description even muddier.

2. The video 'explains' that the asteroids in the asteroid belt are really far away, not the congested stream of rocks usually depicted. But as the video then explains, that huge spacing is only for the very biggest asteroids. In fact we don't know how congested the asteroid belt is for small football-sized or house-size rocks (which could be deadly for a passing space ship), so the typical depiction of the asteroid belt might well be accurate.

3. The video talks about Phlogiston. Why? It has never been part of modern science, so why waste any time talking about it.

4. Likewise unicorns??? Excuse me? For the life of me I don't get why someone talking about science would waste even one microsecond worrying about how a mythical creature is depicted. [I thought "the science is settled" when it comes to Anthropomorphic Unicorn Depictions.]

__________________
Whiskey, women -- and astrophysics. Because sometimes a problem can't be solved with just whiskey and women.
Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: UK S.Northants
Posts: 485
Good Answers: 19
#4
In reply to #1

Re: 15 Inaccuracies Found In Common Science Illustrations

03/03/2014 10:33 AM
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South of Minot North Dakota
Posts: 8376
Good Answers: 775
#2

Re: 15 Inaccuracies Found In Common Science Illustrations

03/01/2014 4:05 PM

Interesting!

It would appear that my high school science teacher was a bit ahead of the curve and that was 22+ years ago! He pointed out a few of these things way back then.

Now my math teacher on the other hand............ Lets just say a he could have been replaced with a box of rocks and I would have learned more that was mathematically correct.

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#3

Re: 15 Inaccuracies Found In Common Science Illustrations

03/02/2014 12:01 AM

I don't think many of us were ever convinced that the illustrations presented an accurate depiction of the event.

The fact that text books are outdated is no secret to any of us. Look at how they are developed, approved and used. (Most are not even used any more) Kansas and Texas still believe that the stork delivers babies.

Mainly, it's a joke. Sadly, many of today's students don't have a clue anyway.

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 4 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

HUX (1); lyn (1); tcmtech (1); Usbport (1)

Previous in Blog: Rolls Royce Said To Be Developing Drone Cargo Ships   Next in Blog: Innovations: A Four-minute Explanation of Why Innovation is So Important to the United States

Advertisement