At this point, autonomous cars are a given, right? Pretty
much every automotive discussion needs to involve the impending availability of
driverless autos. This coming summer (if it ever truly arrives), Tesla will supply all
models with an over-the-air software upgrade that will provide cars with
some of the rudimentary concepts of driverless tech: park-and retrieve and
highway autopilot. While highway autopilot has been featured on some high-end
brands before, it's interesting to see that Tesla has been preparing their
products for this essentially from the beginning.
These vehicles will constitute an L3 vehicle according to the
Society for Automotive Engineers, which has devised 6 classes of automated
vehicles. An L0 vehicle has no automation whatsoever, while an L5 has complete
automation with zero human involvement. Within this range vehicles require
varying degrees of human intervention. By 2035, IHS predicts that there will be
51.4 million L5 vehicles on global roadways (though it's a fraction of the
expected 2 billion passenger vehicles overall).
Many words have been spent on the technology developments
that need to take place to make the autonomous car a reality, as well as how
automakers are going to keep them safe from hackers. Less text has been spent
on all the peripheral changes that need to take place in how we regulate and
maintain our autos.
First, will autonomous cars completely abolish the driver's
license? Obviously some form of government ID will be needed, but taking an
exam to earn a permit to learn how to drive will be superfluous. However,
what's to stop an adventurous 7-year-old from driving to the toy store, or a
rebellious teen from driving away from home? Sure, a parental control and GPS
tracker can solve this, but how do we know when individuals are mature enough
to make their own destination decisions? Do we lower the "driving age"? Do we
let parents decide when kids can ride around in the auto-car? California's DMV has offered
autonomous vehicle licenses as of last fall, but only to qualified individuals
who already possess a typical license. This clearly won't and can't be the
status quo once L5s are common.
Personal responsibility remains a huge threat on the road.
Too many people text while driving or drive drunk. Thankfully, autonomous cars
will eliminate these threats completely. Heck, they'll probably eliminate
fender benders and door dings from parking to close too. So what does
this do to auto insurance? Do rates bottom out, or is the concept
eliminated all together? (Insurance giants aren't going to go down quietly.)
After all, in an L5 vehicle, the human will have zero responsibility for what
happens on the road. So if an accident happens, injury-causing or not, who
pays? The automaker? The programmers?
Also, assuming that L5 vehicles overtake the car market en
mass, what happens to the billions of driver-needing cars around the world? Are
they converted to be autonomous? Are they outlawed? Elon Musk expects
they'll become illegal, but here in the U.S., it will be like trying take
our guns-not going to happen in a country built on firearms and backfire. And
are the millions of classic cars and enthusiasts going to accept that their
hobby/passion isn't the same? Not likely.
Clearly, the autonomous car revolution offers many, many
more questions than solutions. Inevitably each of these will questions will
have an answer, but the autonomous car market may be chaotic in the meantime.
|