Last week, I finally dragged myself to the Verizon store and upgraded to a smartphone. In my wife’s estimation I’m about five years late with this decision, and to my knowledge I’m the second-to-last person at the office to give up a dumbphone. As the salesperson handed me my new phone and my old “paperweight” (his words) he quipped, “Welcome to the 21st century.” Indeed, the post I’m about to write could’ve easily been published in 2010 or even further back.
Previous blog posts attest to the fact that I’m not a fan of smartphones. The Oracle of Delphi supposedly advises knowing thyself, and I know myself to be distractible, impulsive, self-indulgent and having a near-clinical addiction to information of all sorts. Figuring these traits to be incompatible with a pocket-sized computer, I held out for as long as I possibly could.
Granted, smartphones can be unbelievably useful tools. I can now find my parked car without triggering its horn five times and following the sound. My GPS app helps me get around traffic issues, although trusting it with an alternate commute one day added about 10 minutes to my drive when it was supposed to save 15. My wife and I can sync our calendars and never miscommunicate about kid events again. And best (and maybe worst) of all are the infinite distractions, to be accessed at a moment’s notice. Idle boredom seems a thing of the past.
After a week, here are the pros and cons of the smartphone vs. the paperweight:
CON: Battery life. This is a common complaint of smartphone users. Even if I only remembered to plug my dumbphone into its car charger a few times per week, it generally never died of low battery. I’ve gone on three-day trips without a charger and had no issues whatsoever. My iPhone, on the other hand, experiences a low charge every 24 hours or so. So into the wall charger it goes (if I remember).
PRO: Social shame. Never again will I hear “Wow, you work for a tech company and THAT’S YOUR PHONE???”
CON: Distractibility. I find it ironic that my new phone has a Bedtime app that tries to help me stick with a sleep schedule, because every other one of its apps seems to work against that. I’ve found it incredibly easy to become “lost” in the phone, only to look up and see that it’s nearly 11 PM. Plus, my job requires me to stare at a computer screen all day, so I’m finding that using the phone after work hours is tough on the eyes.
PRO: Emojis and message encoding. During the last months of dumbphone use, I was getting totally garbled texts from smartphone users, and emojis would show up as a series of tiny rectangles. It was becoming clear that receiving texts from smartphone users (the overwhelming majority of adults, in my estimation) was becoming more difficult.
CON: Value. I’ve never, ever had to be fearful of losing my phone until now. Who would steal a $75 phone, after all? Cracked screens were a non-issue as well.
PRO: The camera. This was probably the #1 aspect I was missing. My phone’s camera is much better than my family’s digital camera, to say nothing of the grainy pixelated photos the dumbphone took.
During the past two years or so, major telecom manufacturers like Nokia have introduced hybrid dumbphones with simple, smartphone-like apps, and flip-phones are becoming popular again in Japan. Maybe in the future people will use both, like families owning both a practical and a souped-up car. Or maybe we’re just bored of smartphones already. In my case, I’ll soak up the novelty for as long as possible.
Image credit: CC BY-NC-SA 2.5 CA
|
Comments rated to be Good Answers: