The Engineer's Notebook Blog

The Engineer's Notebook

The Engineer's Notebook is a shared blog for entries that don't fit into a specific CR4 blog. Topics may range from grammar to physics and could be research or or an individual's thoughts - like you'd jot down in a well-used notebook.

Previous in Blog: Set Down That Hedgehog!   Next in Blog: Dating App to Use Fridge Pics in Lieu of Headshots
Close
Close
Close
10 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Can Murphy’s Law Be Described Mathematically?

Posted February 05, 2019 12:00 AM by RSBenner

In its simplest form, Murphy’s Law is defined as “Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong.” Even if you have not heard of this profound law, you most likely have experienced its effects. Getting a flat tire, when it is raining, while late for a party. Who else can you blame but Murphy? But then the question arises: Can Murphy’s Law be described mathematically and, therefore, predicted?

The term “Murphy’s Law” originated in 1949 at Edwards Air Force Base, California. The MX981 Project was being conducted in hopes of determining the amount of G-forces a human body could withstand. During the test, a sled traveled down a track at more than 200 miles per hour and then abruptly stopped in less than a second. Sometimes this sled would carry a test dummy, sometimes an actual person. Edward A. Murphy Jr., a captain in the Air Force, developed a set of sensors used during the testing. These sensors, when attached to the safety harness, would measure the amount of G-force applied when the sled was stopped. When a zero reading was measured after the first test, it was discovered that, although there were only two ways to connect each sensor, the technician had installed each one wrong. Frustrated, Murphy said something like, "If there are two ways to do something, and one of those ways will result in disaster, he'll do it that way." Later, the man who rode the sled during the testing, Colonel John Paul Stapp, attributed the tests good safety record to the team’s awareness of Murphy’s Law which he described as being, "Whatever can go wrong, will go wrong." From there, Murphy’s Law became a part of popular culture with books and websites dedicated to its words.

But can it be proven mathematically? A psychologist, a mathematician and an economist (sounds like the start of a bad joke) set out to do just that. Contracted by British Gas, Dr. David Lewis, Philip Obadya and Dr. Keylan Leyser studied 1000 victims of Murphy’s (or Sod’s, as it is known in England) Law and came up with this equation:

Where:

RSL = Sod’s Law Rating

U = Urgency

C = Complexity

I = Importance

A = Aggravation

S = Skill

F = Frequency

The five main factors that make up this equation, Urgency (U), Complexity (C), Importance (I), Skill (S) and Frequency (F), are set by the individual for each task. These are assigned a number between 0 and 9 with zero being low and nine being high. The value for Aggravation (A) is set at 0.7 based on a poll given to 1000 study participants. The result is Sod’s Law Rating (RSL ) with higher numbers indicating a greater risk of something going wrong.

What does this equation illustrate? The higher the urgency, complexity, importance, skill required and/or frequency of the task, the more likely something will go wrong. Common sense.

Another equation to predict Murphy’s Law occurrences was developed by Joel Pel, a biological engineer.

Where:

PM = Murphy’s Probability

KM = Murphy’s Constant

I = Importance

C = Complexity

U = Urgency

F = Frequency

FM = Murphy’s Factor

This equation has four main factors, similar to the previous equation. These factors, Importance (I), Complexity (C), Urgency (U), and Frequency (F), are task dependent and range from 1 to 10. The value for Murphy’s Constant (KM) is set at one. Murphy’s Factor (FM), as described by the author, is “… a very small number that can only be calculated on a 386-computer running Windows 3.1.” He suggested using FM~0.01 as an approximation. The result, Murphy’s Probability (PM), will approach a value of one as the risk of a problem occurring gets higher.

As much as I enjoyed dusting off my seldom used formula writing skills in Microsoft Excel to test this equation, I was disappointed to discover that, for the given parameters, this equation returns only the value one, regardless of the values for the other factors.

Meaning? “Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong.”

References:

https://people.howstuffworks.com/murphys-law1.htm

http://illyria.proboards.com/thread/26788/mathematical-proof-murphys-law

https://www.scq.ubc.ca/the-murphys-law-equation/

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Sebastopol, California
Posts: 1205
Good Answers: 54
#1

Re: Can Murphy’s Law Be Described Mathematically?

02/06/2019 10:17 AM

Maybe your spreadsheet sodded off.

__________________
Most people are mostly good most of the time.
Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Marine Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 1630
Good Answers: 20
#10
In reply to #1

Re: Can Murphy’s Law Be Described Mathematically?

09/05/2019 2:57 PM

Isn't that "Sod's Law"???

__________________
TO BE. or NOT TO BE. That is the question!! The Bard
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Madison, WI.
Posts: 2074
Good Answers: 77
#2

Re: Can Murphy’s Law Be Described Mathematically?

02/06/2019 11:05 AM

I don't see any value for chaos/randomness which is one of the baseline requirements for Murphy to show up. It seems to be a rating system as opposed to an actual mathematical explanation of the phenomena.

__________________
Knowing is the end result of learning, not believing.
Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - Been there, done that. Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 15600
Good Answers: 981
#3

Re: Can Murphy’s Law Be Described Mathematically?

02/06/2019 12:07 PM

Murphy was an optimist.

__________________
"Don't disturb my circles." translation of Archimedes last words
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: About 4000 miles from the center of the earth (+/-100 mi)
Posts: 9910
Good Answers: 1141
#4

Re: Can Murphy’s Law Be Described Mathematically?

02/06/2019 8:59 PM

No, but it's a bit of Nerd Humor...

Reply
3
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Land of Shining Waters
Posts: 916
Good Answers: 35
#5

Re: Can Murphy’s Law Be Described Mathematically?

02/07/2019 8:44 AM

The given equations omit a well-known Murphy's Law predictor: The probability of any demonstration's failure is directly proportional to the number and importance of the people in attendance.

__________________
It is easier to let the cat out of the bag than to put the cat back in the bag.
Reply Good Answer (Score 3)
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: About 4000 miles from the center of the earth (+/-100 mi)
Posts: 9910
Good Answers: 1141
#6
In reply to #5

Re: Can Murphy’s Law Be Described Mathematically?

02/07/2019 10:30 AM

Ah yes, I do remember the Demo Demon!

Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CT USA
Posts: 257
Good Answers: 14
#7

Re: Can Murphy’s Law Be Described Mathematically?

02/08/2019 4:43 PM

I have always been partial to Coles Law...

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Land of Shining Waters
Posts: 916
Good Answers: 35
#8
In reply to #7

Re: Can Murphy’s Law Be Described Mathematically?

02/08/2019 7:50 PM

Coles Law? Oh I get it. Very good! - Bob Loblaw

__________________
It is easier to let the cat out of the bag than to put the cat back in the bag.
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 973
Good Answers: 9
#9

Re: Can Murphy’s Law Be Described Mathematically?

02/12/2019 9:19 AM

Seems like all the parameters perfectly describe the points you have to consider when you are a 2 timer pretty boy. The master of many.

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 10 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Calnet42 (1); canadianslidewinder (2); Deefburger (1); gutmonarch (1); MOBI (1); rashavarek (1); redfred (1); Rixter (2)

Previous in Blog: Set Down That Hedgehog!   Next in Blog: Dating App to Use Fridge Pics in Lieu of Headshots

Advertisement