Quality Control Blog

Quality Control

The Quality Control Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about product inspection technology, quality control methods & software, quality standards and compliance testing, defect prevention analysis. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: Power conditioning   Next in Blog: Fire and Safety
Close
Close
Close
11 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Electronic ballast

Posted September 26, 2006 11:05 AM by nvmani
Pathfinder Tags: Energy saving

Use of electronic ballast,in place of conventional choke and starter,saves energy consumption in fluorescent tube light fittings. As example,for a 40 watts tube,conventional choke consumes 50 watts of electrical energy whereas electronic choke consumes only 30 watts,thereby saving 20 watts per tube. Electronic ballast avoids the need for a starter.Also,it is possible to illuminate tubes using electronic choke, even with 100 volts. Power factor achievable with electronic ballast is above 0.95.Electronic choke helps instant and flicker free start to fluorescent tubes. Due to these excellent features,life of the tube with electronic choke is enhanced manytimes compared to the tubes having conventional chokes.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Anonymous Poster
#1

Re: Electronic ballast

09/30/2006 4:22 PM

Just as long as you are aware of the problem with third & fifth harmonics

which can cause heating of the neutral conductors.

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#2

Re: Electronic ballast

02/05/2007 12:38 PM

this will say an 40wat tube take additional 50 w =90w

and give ligth like an 60 watt filament lamp?

Is this mit compensating Condensor or without them ?

I look to understand if an 40 watts fl-lamp will be connected

on 115volt line

and 230 volt line.

that make different power consumption (because voltage lossen in ballast!) ?

and also different if compensating is used or not ! (?)

and with electronic ballast is this possible way other values.

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#3

Re: Electronic ballast

03/09/2007 6:03 PM

Why would a manufacturer of motion detector switchs say not to use fl-lights with electronic ballasts but is ok with magnetic ones????

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#4

Re: Electronic ballast

03/30/2007 5:52 AM

what about harmonic distortion ?

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#5
In reply to #4

Re: Electronic ballast

04/15/2007 11:55 PM

You have to use a pattented ckt to reduce the harmonice content, only pays off in large power supplies. CE has never been able to enforce the ruling >^_^<

Reply
Participant

Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3
#6

Re: Electronic ballast

04/16/2007 3:38 AM

In what manner conventional ballast ?& Electronic ballast differs if Harmonics distortion is considered. Which one is good & why?

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#7
In reply to #6

Re: Electronic ballast

07/11/2007 3:43 PM

Electronic ballasts are based on high frequency switching and have two major advantages:

1. High efficiency

2. Low transport cost (they don't even compare in sizea and weight to the clasicalstarter/ballast system.

Disdvantages: 3rd and 5th harmonics can be pretty bad if not corrected with an active power factor corector. If pf near unity, 3rd, 5ht, 7th...11th harmonics are goiong to be very small in amplitude => insignificant.

Reply
Commentator
India - Member - Electrical Energy

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tamilnadu
Posts: 57
#8

Re: Electronic ballast

07/26/2007 3:45 AM

During replacement of choke in the existing Tubelight we are replacing with Electronic choke at about 10000 light. The performance is good in my experiance.The efficiancy will be improved further if we provide T5 Lamp.Hence need not be worried about harmonic for lighting circuit alone.

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#9

Re: Electronic ballast

06/24/2008 11:10 AM

Dear Sir,

In reply to your article on electronic ballast, I find that the major problem associated with electronic ballast is that they don't last long as compared to conventional ballast. My previous past experiences with electronic ballast is that these electronic devices are prone to internal control transformers burning up and electronic components failure. I ended up with extra downtime hours and incurring extra manpower hours to change these failures. Imagine a car parking floor of a huge shopping complex with a of minimum of 120 florescent tube fixtures and multiply that with 10 levels of car park, you can imagine the number of florescent light fixtures that employs electronic starter fixtures. If a failure rate of 10% expected, that would means about 120 electronic starters needed attention. Perhaps then I would rather stick on to conventional electrical ballast that last longer. Regards,

David TW Liew

davidtw.liew@gmail.com

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#10
In reply to #9

Re: Electronic ballast

06/19/2010 2:18 PM

I face the same problem of the short lifespan of the electronic ballast. It might be due to the ambient temperature I face in the tropical climate. Yes, the tubes last very long with good light output but the e-ballasts only last me about 2 years whether I use good ones or the cheaper ones. I have all switched to the cheaper ones. I am now exploring reverting back to the coils and use electronic starters because replacing the electronic ballasts is a hassle.

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#11

Re: Electronic ballast

11/29/2010 11:46 AM

Can I use a motion sensor that is not for electronic ballast on an electronic ballast light loop?

CR4 Admin - email removed

From the Site FAQ: Do not post phone numbers or email addresses.

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 11 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (9); atulshitkande (1); G.Swaminathan (1)

Previous in Blog: Power conditioning   Next in Blog: Fire and Safety

Advertisement