Rockaholic Adventures Blog

Rockaholic Adventures

Rockaholic Adventures is the place for conversation and discussion about geologic phenomena and mountaineering excursions. You'll also read reviews written from the perspective of today's technologically-advanced outdoorsman - one with a background in engineering and geology.

Rockaholic Adventures also covers topics such as unconventional oil & gas technologies and environmental geochemistry. The blog's owner, Shawn, is a technical writer at IHS where he writes a quarterly newsletter, Unconventional Oil & Gas News. He graduated magna cum laude in 2006 from the University at Albany where he majored in geology.

Previous in Blog: <b>The Missing Carbon Problem (Part 2)</b>   Next in Blog: The Missing Carbon Problem (Part 4)
Close
Close
Close
Rate Comments: Nested

The Missing Carbon Problem (Part 3)

Posted February 24, 2009 5:00 AM by Shawn

Oceanic sinks and feedbacks to climate change are as variable and hard to measure as their terrestrial counter parts. The oceans are in equilibrium with the partial pressure of CO2 in seawater balanced by its concentration in the atmosphere. Carbon dioxide is transferred into the atmosphere when its molar concentration in seawater exceeds the pressure from its bulk concentration in the atmosphere. If the inverse is true, we observe a sink of CO2 in our oceans.

Negative Feedbacks to Climate Change

The primary production of carbon dioxide in shallow oceans near continental margins hosts 30% of the ocean's total primary production. This amount is far larger than the percentage of surface area out of the total ocean that the continental shelf accounts for at roughly 7%. So without a doubt, as ocean water rises, we will see a negative feedback to atmospheric CO2 concentrations.

Why There is Variance

The variability comes from fluvial inputs, enhanced zones of primary production, vertical mixing of water masses, saturation during night hours, and seasonal variances.

Jeopardizing Any Plausible Sequestration

Several variances seem to downplay any plausible sink. First, during the winter, primary production is negligible and CO2 accumulates near the surface. Second, during the spring when river discharges are high, fresh water or fluvial input from rivers and estuaries increases CO2 concentration and jeopardizes the possible sink. Third, when vertical mixing or upwelling occurs, there is over-saturation of carbon dioxide in the surface ocean. These dynamics are highly variable and just as the above cases saturate the surface ocean, there is a counterpart that depletes the CO2 concentration in the surface ocean.

Understand that Oceans Act Like Sponges

The oceans seem to hold a dynamic equilibrium with the world's carbon cycle. There is also a high degree of variance of CO2 concentrations in our oceans. An exact figure of the amount of carbon that is sequestered by biological growth alone is poorly understood. Several theoretical approaches to correct for the model's imbalance suggest that vertical mixing of carbonate-rich waters sequesters an alarming amount of CO2. It is easy to suggest that the missing carbon is fluxing into our oceans where its future long-term residence time is found in the formation of carbonate sediment beds.

What May Come?

Is this the only answer? Well, of course not. But just how quickly and how much carbon can we push into the oceans? Will there be adverse effects like rising pH and disturbances to the food chain? Will there be a dreaded shift to the thermohaline circulation? What kind of climatic impacts could such an event have in today's environment?

References:

1. Chester, Roy. Marine Geochemistry Second Edition. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science Ltd. 2000, 2003

2. Richard Houghton, Senior Scientist, Carbon Research. Understanding the Global Carbon Cycle. Woods Hole Research Center, http://www.whrc.org/carbon/

3. Hesshaimer, Vago, Heimann, Martin, Levin, Ingeborg. Radiocarbon evidence for a smaller oceanic carbon dioxide sink than previously believed. Nature (London). 370 (6486), p. 201-203, 1994.

4. Frankignoulle, Michel , Borges, Alberto V. European Continental shelf as a significant sink for atmospheric carbon dioxide. Global Biochemical Cycles. Pages 569-576, September 1, 2001

5. Houghton, R. A. , Davidson, E. A. , Woodwell, G.M. Missing sinks, feedbacks, and understanding the role of terrestrial ecosystems in the global carbon balance, Global Biochemical Cycles. Vol. 12, No. 1, Pages 25-34, March 1998

6. Tsunogia, Shizuo , Ono, Tsuneo , Watanabe, Shuichi. Increase in total carbonate in the western North Pacific water and a hypothesis on the missing sink of anthropogenic carbon, Journal of Oceanography, Vol. 49, Pages 305-315, 1993

7. Burdige, David J. , Alperin, Marc J., Homstead, Juliana, Martens, Christopher S., The role of benthic fluxes of dissolved organic carbon in oceanic and sedimentary carbon cycling. Geophysical Research Letters, Vol.19, Pages 1851-1854, 1992

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Anonymous Poster
#1

Re: The Missing Carbon Problem (Part 3)

05/18/2010 3:04 PM

The oft quoted "oceans act like a sponge" in so handily true. Looking at science daily website, the new info is that marine sponges take in carbon and shed it through their intestinal linings and so feed the 'carbon' to the coral reef. Its wonderful!! The missing carbon is no longer missing--the sponges are repackaging it for reef food.

Another posting says marine sponges do not DO NOT share common human ancestor. I read that to mean that life was created more than once. Glass sponges thought extinct live 700 feet down and use methane for food.

Notice that methane is increasing?

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry

Previous in Blog: <b>The Missing Carbon Problem (Part 2)</b>   Next in Blog: The Missing Carbon Problem (Part 4)

Advertisement