Previous in Forum: Pneumatic Question On Cylinder Action   Next in Forum: Essential Variables for Post Weld Heat Treatments
Close
Close
Close
19 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Active Contributor

Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 11

Reduction In Speed

03/25/2015 2:09 PM

We have cement plant having Raw Mill, driven by gear box of ratio 6.16 & AC slip ring motor of 350hp, 1460 rpm. The same gear box got damaged. Our plant is in Ethiopia & to arrange spare gear box requires min. 3 months.

Meantime we want to install another gear box having ratio of 5.13, to match required speed we planned to put two pully belt system.

Kindly advice for following

1) Pully belt system should at input or output of gear box?

2) We want to put two pully c-c distance 1 meter appox. It should be more or less?

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#1

Re: Reduction In speed

03/25/2015 2:13 PM

A1) if he pulley system requires to slip if the gearbox gets jammed, it goes on the input shaft.

A2) -

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 11
#2

Re: Reduction In speed

03/25/2015 2:21 PM

We want pully system should not slip on load & able to take 350hp load for desired output of machine.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1296
Good Answers: 104
#3

Re: Reduction In Speed

03/25/2015 3:01 PM

A belt drive on the input side will be more economical (cheaper), PROVIDED the gearbox you propose to use is rated for the added torque you will be subjecting it to. Was the original set-up direct drive input and output? What is the rating of the proposed gearbox? That's going to be some drive. Is your motor designed for belt drive loads?

Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - Been there, done that. Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 15600
Good Answers: 981
#4

Re: Reduction In Speed

03/25/2015 3:16 PM

I'm curious if you know why the old gearbox got damaged and did you correct the root cause of this failure?

__________________
"Don't disturb my circles." translation of Archimedes last words
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#11
In reply to #4

Re: Reduction In Speed

03/26/2015 5:54 AM

Quite.

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Base in Madrid, Spain. Updated location every several months.
Posts: 126
Good Answers: 3
#5

Re: Reduction In Speed

03/25/2015 7:59 PM

Dear Ashok,

It seems that you have not many options but, to help you improve your chances of success, a bit of information would be great:

1. Which kind of raw mill do you have?

2. Which gearbox?

Regarding the belt driven solution:

3. How this change of ratio affect to the power load in the motor? Can the motor take the change?

4. Are there chances for a "loaded" start-up? If so, belts could slip till burn or snap.

In case of slipping, some good willed guy could try to overtight them, and transfer the problem to to a worse / more expensive place (like shaft or bearings).

Best of lucks,

Abel

__________________
Everyday learning.
Register to Reply
2
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Posts: 662
Good Answers: 49
#6

Re: Reduction In Speed

03/26/2015 12:24 AM

Putting the pulleys on the LOAD SIDE will provide the highest protection of the replacement gear box- or ANY replacement gear box because the belts will snap at a load that will typically be lower than the metal fatigue factor for the reducer system.

It will ACT much like circuit breaker in an electrical feeder- stopping power transfer before it can cause damage to the much more expensive gear box.

__________________
NO MATTER HOW WELL YOU HAVE DONE SO FAR, ALWAYS TRY TO BE BETTER TOMORROW.
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Port Macquarie N.S.W. Australia
Posts: 1071
Good Answers: 225
#7

Re: Reduction In Speed

03/26/2015 1:58 AM

As this new gearbox is a lesser reduction than the older one, and therefore the output shaft will rotate roughly 20% faster, and the motor is a slip ring type, have you considered simply using the motor's inherent speed control characteristics to adjust the speed? I don't know what type of starting gear you have, but many have the ability to maintain a 20% lower speed for long periods. Losses may be greater if you don't have slip energy recovery technology, but that may be acceptable until the new gearbox is available.

Torque transmission via the gearbox will be down by around 17% but, depending again on your motor starting gear, you may be able to compensate for that, provided of course the gearbox is sufficiently robust, so that may need to be considered.

Register to Reply
2
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#8

Re: Reduction In Speed

03/26/2015 2:20 AM

Any belt system should be placed on the lower torque, higher speed side of the gearbox.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - Been there, done that. Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 15600
Good Answers: 981
#16
In reply to #8

Re: Reduction In Speed

03/26/2015 9:12 AM

You and Energygod state the advantage/drawback of the same attribute of a pulley system transmission. It is up to the OP to decide if belt slip is a protective advantage or an operational drawback.

__________________
"Don't disturb my circles." translation of Archimedes last words
Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 11
#9

Re: Reduction In Speed

03/26/2015 3:53 AM

Thanks to all.

Following are the more details.

1) Original gear box damaged due to misalignment & poor civil foundation, same this time we are doing better.

2) Original gear box input & output is direct coupled with gear coupling to motor & Raw mill gerth gear first pinion.

3) The new gear box rating is higher than original gear box( 500hp).

4) Motor drive is Direct on line starter with ACB.

Kindly advice for following

1) Pully belt system should at input or output of gear box? which is good to take rated load. We wish to put it on output side to sustain misalignment from raw mill side. What care should we take to avoid slip of belt due to load.

2) We want to put two pully c-c distance 1 meter appox. It should be more or less?

Register to Reply
2
Guru
Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2008
Location: CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU, INDIA.
Posts: 1851
Good Answers: 65
#10
In reply to #9

Re: Reduction In Speed

03/26/2015 4:30 AM

Dear Mr. Ashok Takali,

The belt drive should be on the input side of the Gear Box. The reason being, if the belt drive is on the out put shaft will result in MORE PULLING FORCE since the Torque will be multiplied in accordance with the GEAR BOX RATIO which is 6.16 initially and 5.13 in the proposed change.

If the Pulling Force is large, the Number of Belts to be used will be more and hence pulley will have to be bigger in terms of length, to accomodate more number of belts. This may lead to fall in Efficiency.

Why the Gear Box has failed is to be understood properly and if allignment is the problem, use Tyre Coupling or Rope Coupling to take care of misallignment.

Pl. check for the Service Factor of the Gear Box and it is better to have 2.0 or more. Also check for the shock Factor - since you are using DOL Sarter.

DHAYANANDHAN.S

Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Port Macquarie N.S.W. Australia
Posts: 1071
Good Answers: 225
#12
In reply to #9

Re: Reduction In Speed

03/26/2015 7:05 AM

I have to wonder if/why you are using a wound rotor motor and starting it DOL.

Apart from a high inrush current, the starting and pull up torques of a 350hp slip ring motor starting DOL would be immense especially if the line voltage is a high value which, while reducing the current would also limit voltage depression and therefore maximise torque, this could be the reason for the demise of your gearbox and the failure of the footings as it may have literally ripped them to pieces.

It's been a fair while since I calculated the starting torque of one of these, and never DOL, so please correct me if my figures are awry, but I'm guessing at a full load torque of around 1700Nm and starting torque of anywhere up to 34,000kg-cm, so that acting on a 10cm diameter shaft could exert something around a 170 tonne kick on the gearbox from rest if the static load is high.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Eastern Arizona mountains on Route 666 about a mile from God's country
Posts: 1676
Good Answers: 122
#18
In reply to #12

Re: Reduction In Speed

03/26/2015 9:38 AM

We have several old, turn-of-the-century wound rotor motors at many of our sites that are driving high starting torque loads such as crushers, ball mills, and conveyor belts.

All that I have examined and worked on so far provide the starting torque required via by shorting the rotor windings through a resistor bank during the start cycle then transferring to controlled rotor field excitation once the motor has reached synchronous speed.

I wonder if the OP's application is this type?

__________________
They said; "Brain size?" I heard; "Train size?" so I said: "I'll take a small one, thank you."
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Port Macquarie N.S.W. Australia
Posts: 1071
Good Answers: 225
#19
In reply to #18

Re: Reduction In Speed

03/26/2015 6:02 PM

Then it's not DOL.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1296
Good Answers: 104
#17
In reply to #9

Re: Reduction In Speed

03/26/2015 9:36 AM

Most, if not all, V-belt manufacturers (I assume you're thinking of using V-belts), have drive design resources available on-line, or could possibly be contacted for drive design. A properly designed drive will address your questions.

I suspect you are in for an eye-opening experience.

Register to Reply
Guru
Technical Fields - Project Managers & Project Engineers - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 623
Good Answers: 33
#13

Re: Reduction In Speed

03/26/2015 7:27 AM

Given your ratios: you are changing from 3.95 revs/second to 4.743 revs/second. Given this is a temporary fix for 3 months if it will run at the slighter faster speed why not just run it? If everything goes okay, probably no one will even notice except that maybe you are getting a little more throughput.

__________________
Hey Isaac, catch! ...oops, that's gonna leave a mark...
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Cd. Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico.
Posts: 1023
Good Answers: 69
#14
In reply to #13

Re: Reduction In Speed

03/26/2015 8:51 AM

I don't believe they got their transmission custom built in the first place, so I agree with you, they could live with that slight ratio change 'till they get the new transmission.

__________________
No hay conocimiento ni herramienta que sustituya al sentido comun.
Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - CNC - New Member

Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Lost Wages Nevada
Posts: 1578
Good Answers: 55
#15

Re: Reduction In Speed

03/26/2015 9:12 AM

You should always install the belt and pulley on the gearbox INPUT shaft. I don't know of a belt and pulley system that could take the torque from the OUTPUT shaft and not just slip until failure.

This next statement is beside the point but I figure the more info I am able to give the OP the better.

Belts and pulleys are for transmitting HIGHER rotational speeds.

  1. Was the original gearbox installed with a solid / rigid coupler?
  2. Was the original gearbox installed with a flexible coupler?
  3. How was the motor connected to the gearbox?

It will always be easier to get the correct speed ratio when you transmit the higher speeds with a belt and pulley from the motor to the gearbox INPUT than trying to transmit the gearbox OUTPUT torque with a belt and pulley to a connection that was previously directly coupled.

Have an experienced fabricator build a platform for the new gearbox that can be easily removed or modified when you receive the new 350 HP replacement gearbox.

__________________
Though it does seem he frequently has a Swiss Army knife or Leatherman and a roll of duct tape with him.
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 19 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

abelmh (1); ASHOK TAKALI (2); bigg (2); dhayanandhan (1); energygod (1); Massey (1); Original_Macgyver (1); PWSlack (2); redfred (2); SHOCKHISCAN (1); spades (3); Tornado (1); Yahlasit (1)

Previous in Forum: Pneumatic Question On Cylinder Action   Next in Forum: Essential Variables for Post Weld Heat Treatments

Advertisement