Previous in Forum: Heat Shield/Vapor lock   Next in Forum: Autodesk Inventor & Vault
Close
Close
Close
5 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Participant

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1

Furnace Design for Heating Mild Steel Scrap

08/01/2007 9:38 AM

Furnace Design:

I want guidance for designing of furnace to heat mild steel to rolling temp,1200Degree Centigrade. Main criteria is that material should be heated using Infrared heaters. can any one help me in Desigining?

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Power-User
Engineering Fields - Marine Engineering - New Member United Kingdom - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 253
Good Answers: 1
#1

Re: Furnace Design for Heating Mild Steel Scrap

08/01/2007 11:02 AM
__________________
Reset, Reset
Register to Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Safety - ESD - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Near Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 50.390866N, 8.884827E
Posts: 17996
Good Answers: 200
#2

Re: Furnace Design for Heating Mild Steel Scrap

08/02/2007 3:04 AM

Why infra red?, induction heating is quicker and is also more controllable (especially for smaller components) and uses less energy I am told (provided your energy source is electricity at any rate!)

__________________
"What others say about you reveals more about them, than it does you." Anon.
Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Systems Engineering - New Member Hobbies - Model Rocketry - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Long.92E,Lat.26N
Posts: 1336
Good Answers: 14
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Furnace Design for Heating Mild Steel Scrap

08/05/2007 6:27 AM

Andy is Right about Speed of heat Transfer with Induction. Infra Red is good for plastics/food!

But what is your thickness-or Diameter and desired throughput?

Induction at High Frequency heats up the outer skin first. Inside could remain cold(Of course if your throughput is slow--the whole get equally hot through Conduction) . Lower the Induction frequency - the heavier the Equipment-and lesser the heat transfer.

Mind you--Induction will not be cheap. You pay Utility at going(ever rising) rates. And there is the total overall η question.

Resistance Heating using mains power in conduction mode is possible--you pay Utility rates-good for small throughputs. Used in Prestressed Concreting.

So also ELPIT type slowsoaking.

Traditional Fuel burning ones are of course there-

  • direct /muffle
  • plain/recuperation
  • Coal/Coke blacksmith forge-furnaces

And finally the possibility of Air Plasma Torches(instead of Cut-through , heat tangentially with say 3,4,5 arranged over 360•). This has been used to heat Pipe Specials.Here too you pay at Utility Ratesx200%~.

Conducting Current,Induction and Plasma--you can switch these off -even for a Coffee break!

Register to Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Safety - ESD - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Near Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 50.390866N, 8.884827E
Posts: 17996
Good Answers: 200
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Furnace Design for Heating Mild Steel Scrap

08/05/2007 7:33 AM

Induction uses less electrical energy than resistive, I prove that every day with cooking!!

__________________
"What others say about you reveals more about them, than it does you." Anon.
Register to Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Tex us
Posts: 57
Good Answers: 1
#5

Re: Furnace Design for Heating Mild Steel Scrap

08/13/2007 9:47 PM

I work in a plate rolling shop. On some "tight" (30") , thick (1.5"), pieces we preheat the partially formed cylinders inside a half cylinder (lid) that's lined with kawool insulation and heated with strategically located homemade propane inspiration burners and exhaust vents. Picture an upside down barbecue! A ten foot long cylinder can be brought up to 1K in about 1/2 an hour. "Soak" time is greater with thicker materials. I would recommend flame-safe burners or physical monitoring to prevent explosion.

Luck to ya!

__________________
me thinks, therefore I am - I think?
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 5 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Andy Germany (2); davah (1); leskranes (1); MUKULMAHANT (1)

Previous in Forum: Heat Shield/Vapor lock   Next in Forum: Autodesk Inventor & Vault

Advertisement