Previous in Forum: hydrodynamic transmission   Next in Forum: bearing heaters
Close
Close
Close
3 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Member

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Caño Limon, Arauca. Oil Production Field
Posts: 9

Control Strategy for PCV (Local, Remote, Auto, Manual states)

09/03/2007 4:12 PM

I'm developing a control strategy in order to convert a LCV (valve) into a PCV. The valve already has its pneumatic actuator (single acting) and it will be command from a digital positioner that converts a 4-20 mA signal to 0-30 psi.

When the PCV will be set to AUTO (and REMOTE) operation, the pneumatic proportional signal will come from the digital positioner commanded by the PLC. In the other hand, when the PCV will be set in LOCAL a local pressure regulator will command the valve. The air source selecction will be done by a solenoid valve 3:2 (3 ways 2 positions)

Since the digital positioner, that I should use, has a signal output that represent the position (ZT). I'm wondering about this signal in the case the PCV would set in LOCAL?.

The digital positioner is attached to the valve pneumatic actuator. The air output from the positioner to the actuator's diaphragm is interrupted by the solenoid when the valve is in LOCAL.

The valve position signal from the positioner wouldn't be real?

Thanks for your advices

PD. the positioner model is: SVI II AP from Masoneiland

Register to Reply
Pathfinder Tags: valve control pressure
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
Philippines - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - Who am I?

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Mindanao, Philippines
Posts: 2147
Good Answers: 53
#1

Re: Control Strategy for PCV (Local, Remote, Auto, Manual states)

09/03/2007 11:15 PM

ChristianCasas,

There are two ways that I can suggest for you to get the position of the valve.

  • Install another sensor that will detect the position and send it back to the PLC. This can be done with a potentiometer and a resistance-to-current (R/I) converter. However, seeing as you're in an oil field or refinery, there may be issues with potential explosion triggering sources. Your R/I converter will need to be close to the valve and be supplied with power. This means that you'll have to house it in an explosion-proof enclosure. Next alternative...
  • Purchase a positioner that has a 4 to 20mA, position-feedback, output. We use Yamatake positioners and this product has the features you're looking for. You can order them with the pressure regulators built-in. They have a switch on them so that when switched to manual mode, the pressure regulator can be used to control the position (ignoring the 4-20 signal). They can also be ordered so that they have a 4 to 20mA position-feedback. It's perfect for your application. What you need is an AVP301.

Good luck.

__________________
Miscommunication: when what people heard you say differs from what you said. Make yourself understood.
Register to Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#2

Re: Control Strategy for PCV (Local, Remote, Auto, Manual states)

09/06/2007 7:21 AM

Something isn't clear. The valve is being used for pressure control ('PCV'), correct? In which case the measuring device will be a pressure sensor somewhere else, with the control algorithm in the PLC trying to correct this signal with the loop in auto. With integral action in the controller and a bit of tuning, so much the good.

The need for a feedback signal from the valve positioner is not clear. Apart from feeding back the position of the valve so that someone can see it remotely, and verify that it is actually changing position in repsonse to changes in the demand signal, its need is largely academic; the system pressure is being controlled in response to changing process load, not the valve position.

In order to use valve position as the measuring element the relationship between the system pressure and the valve position needs to be known consistently. Chances are that this consistency is very low.

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply
Guru
Philippines - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - Who am I?

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Mindanao, Philippines
Posts: 2147
Good Answers: 53
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Control Strategy for PCV (Local, Remote, Auto, Manual states)

09/09/2007 6:50 AM

No, what he's doing is that the PLC controls the positioner when the system is in Remote mode. I believe the remote mode selector is a physical selector switch. When the system is put in Local mode, the control valve's position is controlled by a pressure regulator instead of from the positioner. When the system is in local mode, the positioner is only there for the ride. It's not controlling anything.

His problem is that when the system is in local mode, they do not have any information as to what the actual position is.

His method of control is typical in a petrochemical plant or any plant where there may be an explosive atmosphere. They don't want to have a 4-20mA signal being generated at the field as opposed to it being generated at the control room (where intrinsic safety devices are located).

__________________
Miscommunication: when what people heard you say differs from what you said. Make yourself understood.
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 3 comments

Previous in Forum: hydrodynamic transmission   Next in Forum: bearing heaters

Advertisement