Previous in Forum: Over Current Relay   Next in Forum: PLC Selection
Close
Close
Close
7 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Participant

Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 2

Solar - Point of Common Coupling

01/23/2018 6:05 PM

My question is: If the Utility requires a PF of .99 at the PCC then why doesn't solar design engineers incorporate PF Correction at the PCC instead of at the inverter?

Utilities complain that there is a drop in voltage between the transformer and the PCC. Wouldn't the common sense thing to do is go cheaper and install inverters without PFC and treat the lagging PF after the transformer?

I see this common problem and hear about it almost daily. Is my way of thinking off the grid?

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Guru
Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - New Member Hobbies - Automotive Performance - New Member Technical Fields - Education - New Member Fans of Old Computers - TRS-80 - New Member Hobbies - Musician - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1331
Good Answers: 30
#1

Re: Solar - Point of Common Coupling

01/23/2018 6:23 PM

Just MHO, but I think power companies just use that as an excuse to "technically" discourage customers from moving to solar, by throwing "technical/costly land mines" in the customers way!

__________________
...and the Devil said: "...yes, but it's a DRY heat..!"
Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Guru
New Zealand - Member - Kiwi Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 8777
Good Answers: 376
#2

Re: Solar - Point of Common Coupling

01/23/2018 9:19 PM

Isn't this already included in small scale inverters for individual residential homeowner use?

For larger systems I would have thought that the network authorities (or similar) would dictate what must be included for grid connected solar system projects onto their networks (but again the output is what they are interested in, not how you go about getting it). Is the transformer not also under the solar system suppliers responsibility to supply?

Isn't it cheaper and easier to implement PFC in inverters than separately in the PCC since the inverter is already changing the waveform and PFC in inverters is a common feature already?

__________________
jack of all trades
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: SPAIN
Posts: 233
Good Answers: 13
#3

Re: Solar - Point of Common Coupling

01/24/2018 1:24 AM

Solar panel converters are usually designed to work at the working point where the output power is maximized. The waveform of the power is flat in the seconds scale.

However, PFC waveform is grid frequency pulsating. In practice, energy is stored after being taken from the panels and delivered at the AC peaks.

If the energy was taken from the panels directly as delivered, maximum power would be achieved at peaks, but when the output energy is cero, all the power that could be taken from the sun would not be taken.

This means 50% less output energy. I do not think investors will be happy with this number.

__________________
Building the future!
Register to Reply
6
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Port Macquarie N.S.W. Australia
Posts: 1071
Good Answers: 225
#4

Re: Solar - Point of Common Coupling

01/24/2018 3:16 AM

It's probably important to get the interpretation of a PCC correct to start with.

Prior to the advent of high volume small scale co-generation, the PCC was located at the utility transformer as that was the main point of distribution for the local community.

As more and more small scale grid tie Pv systems come on line, the one PCC has become many and moved to be where the utility service and each Pv system come together. This is generally at or very close to the inverter.

I am assuming here that the transformer to which you refer is the utility transformer outputting to consumers and also receiving power from Pv systems as there would unlikely be any pf induced voltage sag between an inverter and a dedicated transformer feeding into a utility grid from a large scale Pv array

The drop in voltage is caused by the Pv system injecting power back into the grid at unity pf - active power only, this has the effect of reducing active power in the utility but leaving apparent power unchanged. The ratio of apparent power (normally lagging) to active power thus increases, pf falls further below unity, causing the voltage on the grid to sag.

The generators must then produce more apparent power to rebuild the voltage thereby further exacerbating the pf deficiency.

This problem would be largely overcome with the simple addition of leading pf correction in the grid tie inverters. They would then inject both active and leading reactive power into the grid, thus alleviating the voltage sag dilemma.

This correction could be done at the transformer but would be on a much larger and very much more expensive scale than if done locally at the inverters.

Due to the high variability in output from PV systems, a pf correction system at the transformer would need to be constantly switching capacitor banks in and out of circuit to keep the pf on target. Localised pf correction at the inverters is far easier to control.

The question becomes - Who pays? - those supplying the power should ensure that it is of a suitable quality - in this case that is the co- generator rather than the utility.

Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 6)
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 343
Good Answers: 22
#7
In reply to #4

Re: Solar - Point of Common Coupling

01/26/2018 10:40 AM

When we consider the case of roof top solar, this is an additional burden on the domestic consumer.

However, if the connection agreement stipulates the powerfactor for the exported power from solar, it needs to be complied.

__________________
Raghunath
Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster #1
#5

Re: Solar - Point of Common Coupling

01/24/2018 4:26 AM
Register to Reply Score 2 for Off Topic
Guru
Safety - Hazmat - New Member United States - US - Statue of Liberty - New Member Engineering Fields - Chemical Engineering - Old Hand

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 14331
Good Answers: 162
#6

Re: Solar - Point of Common Coupling

01/24/2018 4:50 PM

There is no way to shift the phase angle of voltage and current with DC. It has to come in at the point where the power is changed to 3Φ, you do have a 3Φ inverter, don't you?

Thus you can apply cap bank or even a synchronous condenser if the power level is large enough, but it has to be downstream of the inverter.

__________________
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Just build a better one.
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 7 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

70AARCuda (1); Anonymous Poster (1); Ivanov327950 (1); jack of all trades (1); James Stewart (1); raghun (1); spades (1)

Previous in Forum: Over Current Relay   Next in Forum: PLC Selection

Advertisement