Previous in Forum: Eastwood Welders   Next in Forum: AI Spontaneously Re-Creates Brain Activity Pattern Used in Navigation
Close
Close
Close
13 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Posts: 230
Good Answers: 16

Railway Wagons: Bottom-discharge vs Tippler

05/10/2018 7:10 AM

Hi,

Are there any rail lines worldwide that transports heavy minerals (ores) over long distances, say >500 km, in bottom-discharge wagons (called hopper cars in the US), as opposed to box/gondola wagons that will go through a tippler? My query relates to heavy minerals - iron ore, chrome, etc. - NOT coal. I'm doing some work on comparing the pros and cons of the two systems. My usually brilliant internet searching skills are deserting me on this one!

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#1

Re: Railway Wagons: Bottom-discharge vs Tippler

05/10/2018 9:17 AM

Yep. The UK does it, among others.

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply
Power-User
United States - Member - Western Wisconsin

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Wisconsin USA
Posts: 305
Good Answers: 25
#2

Re: Railway Wagons: Bottom-discharge vs Tippler

05/10/2018 10:34 AM

In this part of Wisconsin there is a lot of "frac-sand" mining. It is all shipped in hopper bottom cars.

__________________
Troy
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#3

Re: Railway Wagons: Bottom-discharge vs Tippler

05/10/2018 11:31 AM

Why not explore the use of combinations of both systems? They could then be used anywhere.

Google: coal unloading from wagons

Register to Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#4

Re: Railway Wagons: Bottom-discharge vs Tippler

05/10/2018 12:16 PM

Coal is coming to an end on the railways of the UK anyway.

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Resting under the Major Oak
Posts: 4347
Good Answers: 181
#5

Re: Railway Wagons: Bottom-discharge vs Tippler

05/10/2018 4:20 PM

40+ years in quarrying and I’ve never come across anything other than bottom discharge. It’s far quicker and easier for bulk loads.

__________________
The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated.
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#6
In reply to #5

Re: Railway Wagons: Bottom-discharge vs Tippler

05/10/2018 4:36 PM

Well, for something new here's some scale models of the ubiquitous "Airfix" 16T mineral wagon. Over 100,000 were built:

The white stripe indicates which end the tipper-end-discharge-door is.

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Hemet, Land of milk and honey.
Posts: 2365
Good Answers: 36
#7

Re: Railway Wagons: Bottom-discharge vs Tippler

05/11/2018 12:20 AM

If your doing this for a personal project it is one thing,

If your doing this for pay, provide enough information to keep yourself a part of the solution.

I once read an article in model railroader that explained in detail the research you are working on

Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - EE from the the Wilds of Pa.

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: middle of nowhere, Pennsylvania
Posts: 2603
Good Answers: 63
#10
In reply to #7

Re: Railway Wagons: Bottom-discharge vs Tippler

05/11/2018 8:12 AM

Yes - the question struck me immediately as a question from a model rail fan looking for a non-typical real world situation that would allow his use of the wrong type of car on his layout.

__________________
Remember when reading my post: (-1)^½ m (2)^½
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Port Glasgow, Free Republic of Scotland
Posts: 360
Good Answers: 30
#8

Re: Railway Wagons: Bottom-discharge vs Tippler

05/11/2018 1:48 AM

I am fairly sure that the Ma'aden Alumina Refinery & Mill used bottom discharge rail cars (it definitely uses rail cars). The rail line runs from the middle of Saudi desert - about 700km in a straight line.

The refinery is just north of Jubail shows up clearly on Google Earth

__________________
Free advice guaranteed or your money back
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Power-User

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Moncks Corner, South Carolina, USA
Posts: 157
Good Answers: 6
#9

Re: Railway Wagons: Bottom-discharge vs Tippler

05/11/2018 8:06 AM

I work at a company that uses both types of unloaders, but for coal.

__________________
You can always tell a Nuke because you can't tell him anything!
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Posts: 230
Good Answers: 16
#11

Re: Railway Wagons: Bottom-discharge vs Tippler

05/11/2018 9:42 AM

Thanks for all the responses! I'm only peripherally involved in this discussion at work, but remain curious re. things I don't know a lot about... The question on bottom-discharge/hopper vs rotary tippler discharge has quite few facets to consider. (One of the financial/operating considerations would be the capital outlay of cheaper gondola wagons with an expensive tippler, vs the more expensive bottom-discharge wagons with a cheaper off-loading facility, coupled with differences in maintenance costs & outages, wagon length, Gross/Nett ratio, axle loads, etc.)

I have seen enough examples of both systems in the coal world, but for heavier minerals (ores with an SG >2.5, say), tippler systems seem to dominate, even over shorter distances, with very few examples of bottom-discharge wagons over the longer distances sometimes seen in coal. My initial question was posed just to see if I'm missing something obvious. I've looked at some systems in Australia & Brazil to start off with.

(Sorry for being a bit cryptic, but I don't want you to do my work! And there are some sensitive issues that limits my ability to discuss in more detail )

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Moncks Corner, South Carolina, USA
Posts: 157
Good Answers: 6
#12

Re: Railway Wagons: Bottom-discharge vs Tippler

05/11/2018 11:24 AM

The biggest advantage I see to unloading a car by rolling it upside down, is that it is difficult to clog. Draining through a hopper facilitated by a vibrator still requires intervention sometimes.

__________________
You can always tell a Nuke because you can't tell him anything!
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Posts: 248
Good Answers: 3
#13

Re: Railway Wagons: Bottom-discharge vs Tippler

05/11/2018 11:58 AM

Gideon you may find some interesting information here. Bottom-Discharge.

sishen to saldanha railway line.

The Sishen–Saldanha railway line, also known as the Ore Export Line, is an 861-kilometre-long (535 mi) heavy-haul railway line in South Africa. It connects iron ore mines near Sishen in the Northern Cape with the port at Saldanha Bay in the Western Cape.

__________________
Tragedy for Engineers is thinking they know so much that they can not learn from any body else.
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 13 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

gideon (1); lyn (1); Oomborrie (1); Phys (1); PWSlack (3); simonsd (1); tonyhemet (1); TonyS (1); Troy36 (1); XNuke (2)

Previous in Forum: Eastwood Welders   Next in Forum: AI Spontaneously Re-Creates Brain Activity Pattern Used in Navigation

Advertisement