Maybe Dark Matter is Not Really Matter

Sorry if you do not understand and please know that I do not regard anyone as an idiot.

A spreadsheet consists of cells and each cell is a calculator. You can give a cell a value and relate this to any number of cells. You can also write a note in each cell to give guidance to the user.

In one of my uses I label each cell as an exact location that can be visited and revisited, in real life.

This is in two dimensions and the locations are on the ground on which I am acquiring and recording data with instruments.

I then change the potential profile of the ground from a source of energy that I control. When electrical energy is impressed into the ground it completes it's circuit according to the laws of physics and this can be plotted as as 3D graph.

This graph can be displayed as a 3D model computer, assisted display.

Each data point on this is at a specific location x,y, and z and you can turn it to get a subjective view from that location. From this subjective location you can see all other locations in straight lines but you cannot measure these straight lines with a straight edged ruler on the two dimensional visualisation that you see on a flat surface.

Now we come to the proposition that time can be likened to 'cones of events' and that means that time is in fact expansion as that is the only way that space can accommodate all the events that we each witness in our own serial timelines.

The only way we can computer model this is by producing a 3D graph of all locations (that are being studied) for each timestamp in our data acquisition system. This results in a 4D graph but this is not possible to represent on a flat surface (to my knowledge)

We have to visualise this and see that the expansion makes straight lines appear to be curved when perceived from a single viewpoint but can be seen to be straight when the whole model is viewed objectively (as a single object).

Dark matter could be the results of errors that are themselves due to this illusion.

"All of the natural laws that I use can be computer analysed."

But that would involve computations which you disdain. And didn't you say that all the natural laws discussed here are wrong?

"Does anyone want to help me? We cannot make up dark matter to make the rust go away or make money."

Sure, just provide your superior spreadsheets and we will evaluate them.

I do not disdain computations so do not lie. I did not say that all natural laws discussed her are wrong. Please read what I said. I said that I use spread sheets to analyse data that I logged in the field by using each cell as a pinpoint location and plot a 3D graph that is referenced to an exact location on the ground. I said that it is necessary to produce a 3D graph for each subject time stamp in order to model the effects of the errors that are present and lead to the invention of dark matter.

CR4 Admin: Spam: This content was deleted because it contained advertising outside the Commercial Space forum. Please review Section 14 of the Site FAQ about advertising.

There is no opportunity in that link to help with anything. It is nothing but an advertisement for yourself, which is against the rules. It has been reported. There was also no reference to layered spreadsheets that you have been repeatedly asked about. You have successfully hijacked this thread for your own financial gains. Furthermore, the voltages in the ground have no reference to dark matter in outer space (or anywhere else). I have wasted enough time on you. <unsubscribe>

This comment is untrue and reflects only on it's author.