Is this New Science?

This was interesting until I heard numbers like US$6.00 to 20.00 per kWh. This guy has his units mixed up.

This guy is pretty much wrong about everything....

But he/they simply found what we all believe is the case. The imbalance is not natural!

Anyone here disagrees?

Jorrie, I wished we all agreed on this. Clearly, SE refuses to consider any data or observations that disagree with his preconceived idea on the climate.

No, climate change has it valid points. What polluted climate change was when it got political, and what made it worse was career politicians acted as self-appointed spokesmen where the media bought in it were making money off it, with questionable predictions, and by questionable, I mean false predictions.

But paint it anyway you want, because that’s what you do.

Well at least you're now accepting that global warming does exist.

I've long felt that Al inadvertently did a great disservice to the science, particularly by making those two movies. His polarizing politics will always get in the way. At the same time, I seriously doubt any movies on global warming would have been made unless a celebrity used their spotlight.

Why do you still cling to these lies?

I've been living on the beach for 70 years, no change in water levels...no change in weather patterns....no change in climate....stop trying to gaslight people, you can't predict the future....

What are you talking about, ‘atleast I’m accepting global warming’.

my qualms were always the people who preached ‘do what I say, and not as I do’ and tried to shove it down ones throat while cashing in and making a fortune.

As far as global warming, consensus is not science. Take away the cash from the players of global warming… and see what you have.

as far as Al Gore, well at least you’re now accepting that he’s all BS.

Hows that feel?

It's not necessarily that I disagree with the facts here, it's the prognostications that I find overstated....the climate has been warming since the last ice age, sure it's changing, it's in a constant state of flux, but the change is so gradual that if nobody said anything, I don't think it would even be noticed...I find the war on CO₂ to be silly and misguided, and the sprint to some romantic fantasy of clean energy to be a hoax...The constant characterization of mankind as being unnatural in a natural world and evil and destructive to the Earth is the definition of misanthropy, a sickness of the mind being preached 24/7 by the media...what is evil is this characterization and the lies being told based on half truths, greed and political agenda's...so much wasted energy ...Carbon dioxide is not the enemy, those that would poison the minds of our children, and steal the freedom's we depend on, are...

By your reasoning it could be the termites that are responsible...or maybe it's the Earth itself that's responsible....

https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/climatescience/climatesciencenarratives/its-water-vapor-not-the-co2.html

By your reasoning it could be the termites that are responsible

Cow farts… if you live on the west coast. But they did find a new tax revenue…

Now you've switched to a non sequitur logical fallacy.

You just refuse to acknowledge anything about the initial scientific paper.

Nothing that comes from NBC or Lyn is science. It is all propaganda.

Your hero's...

Communist's, Socialist's, and the Wicked Witch of the West....

Your homepage...

https://www.dsausa.org/

I personally would NOT call this science. I would call it agenda-driven false equivalencies from which misguided conclusions have been drawn at best, and conspiratorial misinformation at worst.

To begin with, 20 years is a pathetically short period of time in Earth History from which ANY reasonable conclusions could be expected to be drawn!

"HERE" is how the Earth works - When CO2 builds up in the atmosphere the more the earth greens up, and the more photosynthesis that takes place the more Co2 is extracted from and the more O2 and Water Vapor are released and the more clouds form that are available to reflect more direct sunlight away from being absorbed by any specific part of the Earth or the Atmosphere. There is NO scientifically verifiable mechanism that makes the Atmosphere incapable of releasing the heat back into space wherever the Sun isn't shining at the time. Greenhouses have solid corporeal (physical) walls that are the PRIMARY force retaining the heat! The Atmosphere does not have those walls, and any specific type of gas floating around in the Atmosphere is JUST as prone to turn loose of any extra EM radiation as any other, and that radiation is more likely to flow outward toward the night sky facing away from the sun where Entropy dictates that it will flow. The inclusion of Co2 and Water Vapor by the Green crowd as being "greenhouse gasses" is lunacy! If it weren't for the Clouds formed by Water Vapor the Heat wouldn't be reflected back into space as efficiently as it is, and THEN they might have a point. But, they don't!

NOW! It is also clear that they have NOT factored into their conclusions from whatever fluctuations that they may have recorded over the last 20 years all the heat rising from the Earth's core as there IS more volcanic activity than has ever been recorded before and the particulate matter that they inject directly into the Atmosphere. "IF" they are intellectually honest they would be able to see and ingest the evidence which proves that it is MUCH MORE likely that the Earth itself releases exponentially so much more heat and particulate matter (Which IS capable of retaining heat from whatever source) than do humans into the Atmosphere, AND that has been going ever since the Earth has had an Atmosphere!

It is MUCH MORE likely that "IF" there is any significant rise in the Earth's temperature it is SO NOT the fault of man! I am NOT saying that we shouldn't reduce pollution wherever we can! All I ask is that the Government DOESN'T start charging me taxes for breathing out CO2 because all that politicians are going to do with the money is put it in their own pockets! The Paris Accord will ACCOMPLISH NOTHING as far as saving the Earth! The Earth has had higher temperatures in the past and most of America was covered by 1 to 5 miles of Ice at one time in history, and we have had both floods and droughts and we now have a fairly temperate climate! HOW? How did the world ever recover from the extreme highs or the lows? Climate is nothing BUT change with or without humans!

Please check out this Quora answer to the Question: Volcanoes release about the same amount of CO2 every year as humans do, so why, after millions of years of volcanic eruptions, do we still have fresh air? Shouldn't our atmosphere be like Venus's?

https://www.quora.com/Volcanoes-release-about-the-same-amount-of-CO2-every-year-as-humans-do-so-why-after-millions-of-years-of-volcanic-eruptions-do-we-still-have-fresh-air-Shouldnt-our-atmosphere-be-like-Venuss

That explains it much better than I ever could and I want to give credit where credit is due!