HHO

Hi all, I have doubled my fuel mileage with one of these cells, i think the common misunderstanding with the sceptics is we are dealing with another form of energy other than hydrogen with an oxygen boost, by adding current to the water we are disrupting the covalent bond of the molecules, this in turns removes some electrons creating ions (plasma.)

I in fact run a negatively charged cell that is said to be impossible, but if you consider the covalent bonds of the water molecules are nothing but electrons and we are using electrons to disrupt the electrons it becomes clear that we do not need brute force to make these ions, in fact these ions have a hole new field of energy associated with them, in fact there is an anti gravity property about them as well proving this is a hole new field of energy.

You can view the lost secrets of the ark to learn about this new field of energy we are starting to discover, my negatively charged cell produces monatomic hydrogen on its cathode in a solid state that is in a white powder form, by heating my cathode on scales with a torch my cathode lost 13 grams of weight, then gained it back well cooling, you can also put it in a freezer and it will gain weight.

I have also made a spoon lose weight by draining electrons as well, this is clear evidence that electrons are directly related to gravity. You can look up ion lifters, and the B-2 bomber that now charges it's wings, in fact if you look into John hudgonsons work you will see he uses microwaves to disrupt the electron flow.

When looking into this HHO information you should start with browns gas generators or torches as they have been on the market for over 25 years, you will see an implosion feature as well as being able to burn threw a brick well holding your finger or thumb up 2 four inches away without burning your thumb or finger. This is from the implosion feature as well showing just how efficient this energy is.

In short fellas we are dealing with the same thing that happens in nature known as thunder and lighting, thunder is not from thermo expansion as they would have us believe but the negative electrons attracted to the positive ions in the atmosphere introducing the electrons back into the ions with a massive implosion and the water falling back down as rain.

I recommend any one try these cells, just do your home work first because there are some people selling some crap out there, i built my own cell.

I probably wont be back here but you can read all my work on this subject at griffansofdawn.com,forums, general section, page 4 free energy source, it starts off slow as I had much to learn along the way.

Cheers.

Scott.

The link to your forum doesn´t work, please send it again...

Thank you

Cheers. Say "howdy" to Elwood P. for me, would ya?

I started researching hho over a year ago. Figured it to be a scam. I found 2 government reports on hydrogen being used in i.c.e. The first is "guidlines for use of hydrogen fuel in commercial vehicles". It is a 2007 D.O.T. report, and it does mention mention the slight improvement in fuel consumption and pollution particles in diesel engines using on demand hydrogen from on board electrolysis of water. The 2nd, is a 1977 N.A.S.A. report entitled "emissions and total energy consumption of a multicylinder piston engine running on gasoline and a hydrogen gasoline mixture. These 2 reports made me determined to find out for myself, and I started viewing videos. I found a lot that would burn out an alternator in a hurry. Some had outlandish claims. I finally came up with a partially stolen design that does work. I will not make a claim of 90 or 100 mpg increases, but I do enjoy, even in these temporary lower fuel price times, a 15% increase in mpg. My hydrogen generator is not for sale, and I cannot post a video. If interested, I will give step by step instructions on how I built it. Maybe someone can improve on it and tell me how to make it better.

Do you know if pre heating the water will speed or retard the production of HHO? Thankx Harold

Here's the pros: Electrolysis creates Browns gas (hydrogen and oxygen), what some people refer to as 'HHO'. This gas is highly explosive and when mixed with the air intake burns your cars gas more efficiently and theres less pollution out of the exhaust. There are claims of anywhere between 5%-15% more efficiency because you are burning all of the gasoline instead of just some and because hydrogen is so much more explosive. Done this way there's no need to treat your engine against rust .

Cons: the only persons arguement against this type of set-up that may be true is someone mentioned if you tie in to your alternator with this electrolyzer or electrolysis unit then it will cause the alternator to cog down under continous use useing more gas to turn the pulleys. Also the claim is that you would use more gas than any benefit from the hydrogen and oxygen gas mix

conclusion: No scientist has ever performed the test with any car using an efficient electrolyzer circuit set-up and produced the results coherantly so people like you and me can see if its more or less efficient. All I ever hear is it can't be done, then the name calling begins and these smug self promoting so called scientists keep promoting fossil fuels which are not only toxic to our environment but eat up a lot of oxygen to use. The IC engines are polluters and always will be requiring large amounts of atmospheric oxygen to run. I live in Michigan and every year there is a Woodward Dream Cruise (google it) where people show off thier exotic cars. This year there were two cars that created Browns gas and even had thier own stainless steel radiators to keep water cool. They worked AND they were on the news. There are YouTube vids of people doing this for themselves review thier results. If I were you I would learn to make my own efficient unit do not buy them from a retailer because there are cracks out there. Remember, the question isn't " does it work?", obviously it works and will run in the engine. The question should always be " how efficient can we make it? . Good luck to you.