Previous in Forum: Eco - Balanced Township   Next in Forum: Mobile Detection System for the Bird Flu
Close
Close
Close
3 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
The Engineer
Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Physics... United States - Member - NY Popular Science - Genetics - Organic Chemistry... Popular Science - Cosmology - New Member Ingeniería en Español - Nuevo Miembro - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 5060
Good Answers: 129

An Alternative to String Theory?

08/01/2006 11:40 AM

There is an interesting article in New Scientist regarding a theory of everything that uses a noncommutable space rather than strings. At least that's what I think it said, I read it twice and I still don't understand. Still, I wouldn't mind having a theory of everything that could actually be tested.

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa006&colI D=30&articleID=00039831-4051-14C0-AFE483414B7F4945

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
Technical Fields - Architecture - New Member Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Electromechanical Engineering - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Hobbies - Hunting - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Clemson, South Carolina
Posts: 1722
Good Answers: 18
#1

Interesting Article

08/02/2006 10:52 AM

That was an interesting article, and I'm like you -- I don't know if I understand all that was said, even though it was written in plain language.

I think the main thing I got out of it was that physicists and mathematicians have been trying like hell to come up with a unified theory ("theory of everything") for a long time, and it has always seemed to me that things like gravitons, an un-proved "particle" must exist because the mathematical model of what they are searching for says it must. Sting theory depends on it.

Well, I wonder how many wrong roads have been taken mathematically to create a theory of everything?

I like the approach that Alain Connes is taking to prove the existance of the Higgs particle. I never did like scientists' practice of making up particles they can't prove exist.

__________________
We have met the enemy and he is us . . . Walt Kelly
Register to Reply
The Engineer
Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Physics... United States - Member - NY Popular Science - Genetics - Organic Chemistry... Popular Science - Cosmology - New Member Ingeniería en Español - Nuevo Miembro - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 5060
Good Answers: 129
#2
In reply to #1

Re:Interesting Article

08/02/2006 12:36 PM

I don't like an "untestable theory" no matter how elegant the mathematics is. I wish I understood the math well enough to have an informed decision. I'm working on learning it, but it's a slow process and I have to crawl (differential equations and Linear Algebra) before I can walk (Group Theory and Topology).

Register to Reply
Guru
Technical Fields - Architecture - New Member Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Electromechanical Engineering - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Hobbies - Hunting - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Clemson, South Carolina
Posts: 1722
Good Answers: 18
#3
In reply to #2

Re:Interesting Article

08/02/2006 1:45 PM

I "helped" a friend of mine with quantum mechanics years ago by listening to him try to explain it to me and then asking, "Does that make any sense?" Some of it did, and some of it didn't.

As for the differential equations and linear algebra, I went through that also several years ago. I even took linear algebra to improve my GPR, but instead, I hurt it. I had had all the required engineering math courses and knew "engineering math" quite well, having solved numerous sets of simultaneous differential and partial-differential eigenvector equations and the like, so I thought to myself, "Why not take a course in Linear Algebra in the Math Department?"

I had forgotten that math professors liked their students to "prove" theorems, which engineering professors didn't really give a hoot about. Needless to say, the first quiz I took earned me a 25% grade. I went to see the prof after class who asked, "You've never had me for a class before, have you?" I hadn't. He then said, "I guess you came to tell me that you're planning on dropping the course." I said, "Yes." He then said, "If you do well on subsequent quizzes, I'll drop this grade." I took him at his word and stayed with the course and made "B's." Apparently, he forgot what he told me at the beginning of the semester, 'cause he averaged the 25 in with the other grades and gave me a "D." I learned two lessons that semester . . .

__________________
We have met the enemy and he is us . . . Walt Kelly
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 3 comments

Previous in Forum: Eco - Balanced Township   Next in Forum: Mobile Detection System for the Bird Flu
You might be interested in: Reels, Dimensional and Profile Scanners, Cable Reels

Advertisement