Previous in Forum: what are the standard test of a CT?   Next in Forum: i want formula
Close
Close
Close
21 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Commentator

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: New York City (West End Ave.)
Posts: 68

Measuring the Charge for a Dry Cell Rechargeable Battery

02/11/2009 12:53 AM

I don't know much about electronics, but like everyone else I use dry cell 1.5 volt AA batteries. I'm now using rechargeables to get more benefit for my money. I want to know exactly how these things are functioning and I don't know what instruments I can use to measure the life still remaining in the batteries. I know some batteries are especially designed for digital cameras and some for other uses with different parameters. What's the difference between these two types of batteries ? When I recharge them, is there some way I can tell how many hours of use I'll have left for the battery, or where it's a rechargeable and after I do recharge it, how I can find out if it will only have a short functioning life ? There are some places needing batteries that are involved to get at, and I don't want to use a battery that's not going to last a long time there. What's the best strategy? I want to learn what instrument I 'll need and how to measure all that I can relating to a battery. Thanks.

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Transcendia
Posts: 2963
Good Answers: 93
#1

Re: Measuring a dry cell rechargeable battery charge.

02/11/2009 1:50 AM

Primary batteries have full power and go down. Rechargable batteries typically get better after a few charges and discharges, and then over time lose their strength. Primary batteries are not rechargeble. You could get a voltmeter to actually measure the potential of your batteries. If you go to Wikepedia and ask about batteries there is a wealth of information. Everything wears out. Just buy good batteries of either the primary or rechargable type and either throw them away when they stop providing enough power for your MP3 radio or flashlight, or recharge them till they don't do it anymore. Unless you are involved in critical industry applications, you probably will be wasting your money buying a meter to test the batteries. Even recharable batteries wear out over time. Sound technicians for concerts buy new batteries for every show.

__________________
You don't get wise because you got old, you get old because you were wise.
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 158
Good Answers: 1
#4
In reply to #1

Re: Measuring a dry cell rechargeable battery charge.

02/12/2009 4:16 AM

Just curious; where did you get the term ' primary ' battery ?

Register to Reply
2
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4484
Good Answers: 246
#6
In reply to #4

Re: Measuring a dry cell rechargeable battery charge.

02/12/2009 10:55 AM

I'd have to look up the actual etymology, but in practice, primary batteries are those (like alkaline AA cells) which you buy fully charged, and do not recharge. Secondary batteries are those which (like NiMH, lead acid, etc.) are rechargeable. The terms are standard, but not intuitively obvious in terms of actual meaning.

Maybe... and I'm guessing here... the thinking was that the "primary" source of energy in a primary battery is the one shot chemical reaction occurring over the life of the battery, whereas in a secondary battery, the primary source of energy is whatever you use to charge the battery, and the battery is therefore the secondary source. But I'm making this up as I go. Or how about this: in a primary battery the reaction runs in one direction, and in a secondary battery it runs in two directions?

__________________
There is more to life than just eating mice.
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Safety - ESD - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Near Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 50.390866N, 8.884827E
Posts: 17996
Good Answers: 200
#8
In reply to #6

Re: Measuring a dry cell rechargeable battery charge.

02/12/2009 12:02 PM

GA for a good and correct answer.

You called it as it really is......

__________________
"What others say about you reveals more about them, than it does you." Anon.
Register to Reply
Active Contributor
Hobbies - Musician - hi everyone.

Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 14
#17
In reply to #6

Re: Measuring a dry cell rechargeable battery charge.

02/13/2009 12:37 AM

GREAT INPUT!!!

i fully agree....

Chemical Reaction (irreversible) is the source in the primary betteries whereas, in the secondary betteries, the betteries acts as a storage element that store energy in the form of chemical changes, when charged...

i love this site.... u always get to knw fascinating things u might have ignored years ago..

Register to Reply
2
Active Contributor

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Southwestern Ohio
Posts: 24
Good Answers: 3
#2

Re: Measuring the Charge for a Dry Cell Rechargeable Battery

02/12/2009 1:38 AM

Wait a minute. I also buy and change a LOT of batteries and I think you raise a very good question. I suggest you check back tomorrow, as this site has as many opinions as it does participants. That sounds like a slam but it isn't. Most are valid, informative and wonderfully different.

Do check out Wikipidia, that is valid. But I for one agree with you - cutting the time and cost of battery changing could prove extremely beneficial. If you have young children you can spend hours a week replacing batteries that are designed to confound the dexterity of anyone under the age of 5 or over the age of 35. The opportunity to save time, money and/or the environment is worth a few hours research and anywhere from $1 to $15 for a battery tester or multimeter.

What really surprises me is the dramatic range in price and size for various types, sizes and recommended applications (i.e. marketing) of batteries. Yet, in spite of this, not one of them has risen to the top with any significant fanfare in what, 20 years? Maybe 30? Rechargables don't count because the fanfare hasn't hit yet. Yes, it got some advertising, but so did The Clapper and Cia Pets. If the overall value ov various battery technologies and brands is as varied as either their price or even their size would indicate, we would have seen a dramatic change in their usage, wouldn't we? Yet kid's toys still come with AA batteries, cell phones still have their default and higher-end versions and Notebook computers still flake out 30 minutes before the flight is over when they're new and after only a few minutes when they're not so new. Could this be? A decade or so with no significant change in technology? I think not. I think we've just been sitting here, waiting for this question (I sense a war with convention here and I'm trying to bore away the skeptics - bear with me).

Could it be that battery technology HAS evolved but is being stifled or maybe just ignored? It wouldn't be the first time. It took half a century for 40 miles per gallon to get to market, didn't it? And how long did it take some of us to figure out that 2 packs a day might make it harder to run marathons? Or maybe it's a well-intentioned yet obtuse marketing insight, where testing in malls has shown that people who still go to malls and have time to take surveys are afraid to putmodern batteries in their kids toys? Or maybe it's a tooling issue. I'll bet there is someone in China still that is running one of those machines that makes those little 9 Volt transistor radio connectors, don't you think? Well what do you think would happen to marketing if they came back to Duracell HQ and said, people want smaller and more powerful batteries that cost less? If companies worked like that they wouldn't NEED marketing. Marketing exists to try to get people to spend the same amount of money they did 20 years ago for the same product, even though there are much better products out there. Marketing exists to come up with things like the little blue ring around Duracell "Really Really Special" batteries.

So I say we all take a stand, figure out which battery technologies are best for which type of applications and find a way to publicize the fact. Ideally we will knock it down to ONE battery that can be made in a few LOGICAL sizes, but whatever we do must get that annoying energizer bunny off prime time television.

Oh, one other thing. We should run a few objective tests not just on battery technologies but on battery brands also. I'm dying to know if there is a difference between Duracell and Energizer. One of them is lying or at least crossing their fingers when they make their claims. And who doesn't want to know who is making who's store brand batteries? I'm talking about Costco's brand and now Walgreens, CVS and probably PetSmart. We can test whether they discharge them partially to justify the lower cost, or maybe Duracell provides them to Walgreens but uses Energizer's batteries - and visa versa. I'd especially like to include a face off between Duracell's, "The Best Battery in the World" (The Duracell BBW) and Duracell's, "The Best Battery in the World WITH the Silly Little Blue Band" (The Duracell BBW-WBB). For those of you spend more time living and less time shopping, this latter battery claims to offer more oompf. They aren't very technical about it, but they seem to imply faster response times for cameras and such. Not to take anything away from their other batteries, priced lower for contrast perhaps. They don't suggest there is any downside to the blue banded battery, no tradeoff between longevity and oompf speed for instance. Maybe they are the solution (for those of you who are still employed, I mean).

But think about it, the same size battery loaded with the same voltage coming from the same factory.. Do they keep the lid open a little longer so they can trap more electrons or do they deplete the other batteries a bit just before they hit the dreaded blister pack demon? At the volumes they make these AA's and such, what can they possibly do different in terms of process that they couldn't do unilaterally? That is the answer that gets my vote (you probably forgot the question by now, I will remind you, "Is there one battery that is best and, if so, why doesn't everyone know about it?").

The Answer: YES, there MUST be a best technology. But until the tooling breaks or we run out of marketing genius, we will continue to was time, money and.. whatever.

That is why they purposely don't offer the other some of the newer battery types in the same exact size I'll bet. For instance, those super camera batteries they sell COULD be the same size as a AA or, if not, then a AAA or a C or one of the common sizes. But if they did that some of us would stick them up Elmo's backside instead of our trusty Duracell AA's and battery consumption would sdrop to 25% or less.

Hey I am NOT a consipiracy nut. In fact, this may be my first conspiracy theory (that I am allowed to remember, anyway). BUT - I truly believe we are onto something here. What we need is either knowledge or the bandwidth to run some tests. The solution we find could be interesting. We may kill the Energizer Bunny (or at least cut its superbowl budget for good) with just a 1/2" ball of tin foil and a bit of data. Instead of a AA we might find we can stick a lithium ion thingy in Dancing Elmo's back end and watch (and hear) him dance for years without having to break out the jeweler's tools. We need some data. We need some tests. We need minions~!

It sure would make a great project for a Junior Explorer, or maybe a Boy Scout who is into Green. I would volunteer my kids but I'm still sticking batteries up Elmo (young children).

I'll supply the batteries and help with the test plan and spreadsheets and all, but even I don't have the type of time to mess around with this much longer..

Maybe someone who really smart knows the theory behind batteries or will make up the data and we can just run with that. We'll call that Plan A. EMC2, are you out there?

__________________
Sometimes "It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool.. than to speak out and remove all doubt."
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Commentator

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: New York City (West End Ave.)
Posts: 68
#14
In reply to #2

Re: Measuring the Charge for a Dry Cell Rechargeable Battery

02/12/2009 3:06 PM

To Morepower: A bit long winded but quite helpful along with several of the others that followed. But you raise a point in the early part of answer that I think you might consider. If you have a child (or children) who is (are) 12 or younger you might consider having a "family meeting" (I guess the same as a Town Meeting but you get to be President) and talk about the question of having a "Director of (Household Portable) Energy" i.e. batteries, and the management, purchasing/disposal and recharging of them. For what ever level the kid can function on, (s)he should have responsibility for (portable) Energy within your house. Taught how to schedule, preemptive battery changes and the yearly fire detector battery change, and also keep an inventory for the household finance director. I don't have any kids so I may be just fantasizing the possibility of this. I have been surprised though that there is no where a "club" of battery collectors, keeping a asortment box display of all the different kinds and sizes batteries, that one ends up using in daily life these days, considering that "energy" is along with food, clothing, and shelter a necessity of life. I agree with a later post here that there should be a thorough test, so the ignorant like myself can be healed. Batteries are a high profile concern on the grounds of economics, environment, understanding of technologies and science, and their development which is a big concerns for the future in vehicle. (Maybe Obama can be coaxed to give this "chore" to one of his daughters, and she can then be First Family, Director of White House-hold Portable Energy, providing an example for other families. I have one more pressing angle about this that I want to ask some engineers for some knowledge, which I'll write over the weekend. Thanks again. hn

Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
3
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Safety - ESD - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Near Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 50.390866N, 8.884827E
Posts: 17996
Good Answers: 200
#3

Re: Measuring the Charge for a Dry Cell Rechargeable Battery

02/12/2009 3:25 AM

Primary batteries are better for long term low usage like smoke detectors. In the case of such detectors, there are expensive lithium batteries that give between 5 and 10 years of usage from a high quality smoke detector.

For shorter term, higher current usage NimH batteries are the best.

For very short term, higher current usage (portable power tools for example) NICADs are still the best.

Lithium are very long term charge holders, the charge drops very slowly while on the shelf or in a low usage situation. NimH are better in this aspect than NICADs, NICADs have the highest self discharge rate of all.

The secret of all secondary cell batteries (rechargable NimH & NICAD) is in the quality of the charger. A cheap charger will severely reduce the possible life of these batteries.

Remember the old German saying when buying a charger " He saves money, no matter what it costs!"

There are good chargers around from Ansmann (as an easy example, I have one and its really good but not cheap) here in Europe that cool the battery with a tiny fan, it has a switch to swap between NICAD and NimH. It appears to "recover" batteries with a low capacity (usually NICADs), back to original capacity....batteries that others have tossed away, if not shorted.....

By the way, a NICAD that will not charge is either shorted or dried out, the dried out ones can be revitalized with a drop of distilled water in the pressure release cap. The shorted ones can be connected across a car battery for a couple of seconds to "blow" the short. Do not do this any longer than that as it can be dangerous. Use eye goggles and gloves.....do not repeat this if it does not help, any water left will become super hot and may cause an explosion......

NimH, in spite of similar technology, cannot as far as I am aware be recovered in this way, but they also do not, in my experience, suffer in this way either.....

In my experience, cheap Chinese rechargable batteries have the shortest service life of all, good Japanese batteries are the best. I have had some "No-Names" that have been cheap and good, and some that were cheap and rubbish......

The biggest secret is the charger, the best quality you can afford will really reap benefits!! Any charger that causes the battery to get hot is NOT a good charger.....heat destroys the batteries eventually by driving off the water.

Do not try and build your own........it is simply not worth it!!

__________________
"What others say about you reveals more about them, than it does you." Anon.
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 3)
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4484
Good Answers: 246
#10
In reply to #3

Re: Measuring the Charge for a Dry Cell Rechargeable Battery

02/12/2009 12:13 PM

Good post. My experience has been about the same, although I have yet to find a charger I am really satisfied with (at least for AA NiMH cells -- on the other hand, my power tool chargers have always worked well).

Here in the states, NiCads peaked for power tools in maybe 2004, with NiMH now being more common as original equipment, and with LiIon being the premium standard (as in Dewalt, Milwaukee, etc. tools). I have a couple Craftsman Verspak tools* (which are generally cheap garbage -- but very light, small, and handy at times). The Gold (NiMH) batteries came out in around 2002 or 2003, I'd guess.

* But I have not bothered to replace either my shot Silver batteries or switch to Gold, because the batteries are too expensive to make it worthwile -- when the urge strikes, I'll make up a replacement pack of standard cells -- in the mean time I bought a Ryobi 9.6 V rechargeable which retains the light weight, compact advantage. It was about the same price as a set of Versa Pack batteries, with the drill itself essentially thrown in for free. As it turns out, it's been a great drill, usually the first one I reach for, replacing, for most purposes, my pretty good quality Dewalt corded drill -- which is so old that the cord insulation is crumbling, but is works just as well as it did when brand new.

__________________
There is more to life than just eating mice.
Register to Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Safety - ESD - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Near Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 50.390866N, 8.884827E
Posts: 17996
Good Answers: 200
#12
In reply to #10

Re: Measuring the Charge for a Dry Cell Rechargeable Battery

02/12/2009 12:41 PM

If Ansmann Chargers are available where you live, I think that you are in for a pleasant surprise.....

__________________
"What others say about you reveals more about them, than it does you." Anon.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4484
Good Answers: 246
#13
In reply to #12

Re: Measuring the Charge for a Dry Cell Rechargeable Battery

02/12/2009 1:13 PM

Yes they are -- I was just looking into them. I'd love to have the rack mount version -- I much prefer that packaging to the consumer packaging. But alas, I'd have a hard time justifying the cost. Thanks for the suggestion -- I'll no doubt get one of the consumer units.

If I had nothing but time and money, I'd have rack mount everything, partly to keep everything where I can find it, partly for the industrial quality level that often goes along with rack-mounted equipment, but just as much for the styling. Stationary components that look like that are designed to move or fly seem silly -- I like the looks of my HP multifunction printer, which is basically a rectangular prism: it doesn't look like it is designed to move, and fortunately, does not.

In a bookstore last night, I casually looked at an IPod dock, it was a fairly large, nicely finished brick-shaped thing, with a single large control knob. It was quite heavy -- I am almost certain it was artificially weighted to give the impression of solidity and quality. It's not something I need or even want all that much, but I certainly fell for the styling.

__________________
There is more to life than just eating mice.
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Valdosta, GA
Posts: 361
Good Answers: 8
#5

Re: Measuring the Charge for a Dry Cell Rechargeable Battery

02/12/2009 5:58 AM

This is what I use to test my batteries.

It is a cheap battery tester but I have found it to be very useful over the years.

The best batteries for my uses are NIMH for the most part. I do, however, use batteries specifically for high drain electronics in some instances, and, of course, Lithium Ion is best for computer batteries. I don't believe you can get LION in the needed voltage to be used as AA. Someone correct me if I am wrong because I would love to get my hands on some if they exist.

I always use battery chargers that have some intelligence. What I mean is they have to be able to stop charging at a high rate and switch over to trickle charge once the battery is charged up to capacity. These are some of my batteries and chargers:

As far as camera batteries go, I used to work for Event Imaging Solutions at Wild Adventures in Valdosta, GA and they used AA NIMH in all their G4 cameras. So, what does that tell you. Sure, you can get batteries for cameras that might last longer but once they run down they are useless... (like I say, unless you can show me a LIon in an AA that's rechargable... still looking)

__________________
Always use protection.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4484
Good Answers: 246
#7
In reply to #5

Re: Measuring the Charge for a Dry Cell Rechargeable Battery

02/12/2009 11:18 AM

I use NiMH for photography too, and would prefer LiIon, but as you may know, the basic voltage of a LiIon cell is too high for direct replacement of an AA cell. For many devices with two AA cells, however, the LiIon voltage (typically 3.6 V, nominal) would work as a replacement for two AAs in series. In fact, some cameras have Li Ion packs, but can also operate on 2 AAs. The camera's battery charge level indicator would have to be modified, of course, and in those cameras which can use both types, I imagine there is a detection method used.

NiMH batteries work far better in cameras that alkaline, with the higher AH rating ones lasting longer, even on a single charge, than the alkalines. However, I've been dissapointed with overall battery life, and have found that some quick (15 minute) chargers (even those equipped with moderately sophisticated electronics, cooling fan, etc.) just destroy the batteries, with the life being only 10 cycles, instead of the advertised 1000 or more -- even when the charger is used with the batteries supplied with it.

__________________
There is more to life than just eating mice.
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Safety - ESD - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Near Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 50.390866N, 8.884827E
Posts: 17996
Good Answers: 200
#9
In reply to #7

Re: Measuring the Charge for a Dry Cell Rechargeable Battery

02/12/2009 12:04 PM

Thats similar to my experiences, which is why I recommend Ansmann as being a really good charger manufacturer....in Europe at least!

__________________
"What others say about you reveals more about them, than it does you." Anon.
Register to Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: New York City (West End Ave.)
Posts: 68
#15
In reply to #5

Re: Measuring the Charge for a Dry Cell Rechargeable Battery

02/12/2009 3:24 PM

Thanks for your answer and photos. I have an even simpler smaller (cheaper?) battery tester that I bought from Radio Shack a year ago. But I think I should know more about the batteries status than whether it needs "recharge", (or replacement) is "low" or "good". Aren't there any trackable numbers that go with these things ? E.g. exactly how many volts the battery is putting out (and at what amperage if that's proper electronics) also whether the battery is better for high drain of low drain usage, and most important how many hours, days or months I should expect are left, (on average). It's my general understanding that meters can be built for anything, is one of these functions out of the question ? (Don't the battery manufacturers themselves have all this researched "down to a science"? What I really want is a a battery holder with some circutry built in to it that I can plug into my laptop put a battery in an get a full diagnosis - is this totally out of the question ? hn Also how can my same simple meter, without any "adjustments" measure, totally different kinds of batteries that have a variety of different powers? (US Pat # D297516 and WG (West Germany?)pat #3530148

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Valdosta, GA
Posts: 361
Good Answers: 8
#16
In reply to #15

Re: Measuring the Charge for a Dry Cell Rechargeable Battery

02/12/2009 7:22 PM

I am not sure there is a way to scientifically predict the types of things you are looking for. There are too many variables involved to be that precise. I try not to let my batteries get too low before swapping them out. I feel that the more you let them run down, the less life you will get out of the battery. If you completely discharge your batteries every time you may shorten their life regardless of how they appear to be at present. Also, charging too fast will shorten battery life as well, even though some battery makers tout the ability of their batteries to be charged quickly. I wonder if it would not be in their best interest for you to replace your batteries frequently. All in all, I have had good success with my NIMH batteries and long life. I believe this is partly due to just taking good care of my batteries. Also, I would like to mention that I use from 3 to 5 microphones every week with 9 volt NIMH batteries. I don't buy new batteries every time we perform. The cameras I use now use Lithium Ion rechargable batteries but I used NIMH AA for years. I used NICAD before that and they did not do well with repeated charging and discharging only partially because of the memory effect. This not true with NIMH. They seem to get better with repeated use up to a point as was previously mentioned. The battery tester I use introduces a load across the battery and if the battery is weak (not just discharged) it will reflect that. I usually test the battery several times in succession to prove the capacity before sticking it in a device. With repeated use of this tester I can now "read" a battery's condition pretty well. I also try to keep a record of when the battery was purchased. When they start getting 3 or 4 years old I usually relegate them to less hazardous duty (like powering led lights that work even with weak cells).

__________________
Always use protection.
Register to Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Safety - ESD - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Near Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 50.390866N, 8.884827E
Posts: 17996
Good Answers: 200
#19
In reply to #16

Re: Measuring the Charge for a Dry Cell Rechargeable Battery

02/13/2009 4:38 AM

I just posted in reply to someone else, it tells you that what you have been doing is excellent, but now you can see why it is excellent!

__________________
"What others say about you reveals more about them, than it does you." Anon.
Register to Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: New York City (West End Ave.)
Posts: 68
#20
In reply to #19

Re: Measuring the Charge for a Dry Cell Rechargeable Battery

02/13/2009 8:44 AM

Thanks for both your answers 18 and 19. Yes, I would like to see the manual if it's in English, (or even if only in German if it has many diagrams and illustrations). Maybe the Patent number also if available.(Patents usually have some good illustrations. I'm glad this hits a good enough chord that some one has already done it, including the hook up to computer. Now who do you think is using it, either by industry, function, or something else? Is it being sold on EBay? Or how to describe it and I'll make myself an Ebay Alert. Is it "a battery (cell) diagnostic machine ?" But the greater question, is can it be made much cheaper ? i.e. what's in it circuit-wise ? And if not the whole thing, than just some useful functions ? xxxx I didn't know that about the weakest cell, and that pretty useful info. Thanks. I look forward to more details. Also, what's/where's the post you refer to in your shorter 2nd message ? hn

Register to Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Safety - ESD - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Near Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 50.390866N, 8.884827E
Posts: 17996
Good Answers: 200
#21
In reply to #20

Re: Measuring the Charge for a Dry Cell Rechargeable Battery

02/13/2009 9:05 AM

I have looked at the manual, it won't be easy to understand without being able to read German. There appears to be no English version as far as I can tell.

The company is called ELV, see if they have an outlet in the USA on the internet in the USA.....

Their products are seldom seen on ebay....except 2nd hand maybe, they do not sell there as far as I am aware....

__________________
"What others say about you reveals more about them, than it does you." Anon.
Register to Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Safety - ESD - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Near Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 50.390866N, 8.884827E
Posts: 17996
Good Answers: 200
#18
In reply to #15

Re: Measuring the Charge for a Dry Cell Rechargeable Battery

02/13/2009 4:35 AM

Of course, anything is possible, here is just what you wanted (sorry its in German) it does all what you wanted too, it can even be connected to a PC, can have ID tags on each battery pack etc etc, but it costs €299 or the best part of $400!! Do you want to pay that much?

If yes, I can check for you to see if there is an English manual, just let me know please.

I personally would rather invest (far) less money in a good charger and good batteries. It has stood me in very good stead up to now.

By the way, an important criteria is to know the point at which a battery should be regarded as being "empty" even though voltage may be still available. For rechargeable cells it is usually around 1 volt per cell, sometimes 1.1 volts......

Do not forget that in a Battery (a collection of single cells), what always happens is that one cell is always "weaker" than the rest and is therefore "empty" first, then the current passing through it from the other cells, reverse polarize and damage it further, eventually (sometimes instantly) this cell does not take a charge anymore and the battery can be put into the the correct place to get rid of useless batteries (not the trash please!).

This problem is true of all the normal cell types in a battery, Lead Acid, Nicad, NiMH, Li Po etc etc....

I tend to not run a "Battery" (a collection of cells, not a single cell) down to the minimum for that reason. Its not quite so bad if you have another cell of the same type, from the same manufacturer of the same age to replace it, but anything else is just asking for problems........Car batteries cannot be quite so easily split up either! and since the cell connections get covered up nowadays, most people don't even notice that only one cell is bad!!.....For lead acid batteries, those cheap chargers are often the reason that the batteries die before there time.....but here is not the place to discuss Lead Acid batteries....

Any further questions, just ask!!!

__________________
"What others say about you reveals more about them, than it does you." Anon.
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4484
Good Answers: 246
#11

Re: Measuring the Charge for a Dry Cell Rechargeable Battery

02/12/2009 12:36 PM

BTW, after rambling on about other issues:

I use a digital VOM (measuring repeatably, but not necessarily accurately, to .01 volt) to monitor batteries. I keep mental track of (no load) fully charged voltages for good batteries (and having no functional memory, I have to retest a known good battery to occasionally recalibrate my thinking). I mark suspect batteries and watch them more closely, to avoid getting stuck with a failing battery in the camera, and to avoid having a good battery mixed with a bad one. Purely subjectively, I'd say that if the fully charged voltage is .1V lower than for a good battery, the battery is on its way out, and is getting pretty close to the knee in the life curve where things are going to hell in a handbasket.

You might get a better feel for actual condition with a standard load on the battery while testing, but that seems a little extreme, from my perspective, for AA cells.

__________________
There is more to life than just eating mice.
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 21 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Andy Germany (7); Blink (5); DRFREON (1); Keywalker (2); Morepower (1); nofineprint (3); Transcendian (1); vinay.chawla (1)

Previous in Forum: what are the standard test of a CT?   Next in Forum: i want formula
You might be interested in: Industrial Batteries, Reserve Batteries

Advertisement