Previous in Forum: Nitrogen Plant   Next in Forum: Helium Properties
Close
Close
Close
15 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Active Contributor

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 13

Titanium or Carbon Nanoparticles?

08/17/2009 3:18 PM

We're at the POP and prototype stage of a new device. It's an add-on for personal weapons, with possible military applications, and requires high structural integrity.I'm wondering if the 'body' of the beast should be Titanium or Carbon nanoparticles.

Does Titanium lend itself to die casting? The structure is relatively complex, with internal mountings etc. What would the best (simplest and cheapest) manufacturing process be with either Titanium or nanoparticles? And which of these materials would be more robust in a demanding environment?

Register to Reply
Pathfinder Tags: manufacturing materials process
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Guru
New Zealand - Member - Kiwi Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 8777
Good Answers: 376
#1

Re: Titanium or nanoparticles?

08/17/2009 3:43 PM

Without knowing more details (such as the size and shape) it is hard to say. Titanium can be machined like stainless steel but I am not sure about very fine die casting.

Titanium isn't cheap, and carbon fibre is difficult to mass produce in small shapes, so a combination of carbon fibre and titanium along with cheaper materials like high strength plastics and stainless steel or aluminium alloys is likely your best bet. Again it is hard to say what will work best for your application, but I would find it hard to believe you would need the bulk of the device made from something as strong and exotic as Titanium.

Have a very close look at your application (along with similar devices already on the military market) for more ideas and a clearer picture on what materials, ruggedness and cost is considered suitable in your particular target market.

__________________
jack of all trades
Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 13
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Titanium or nanoparticles?

08/17/2009 4:08 PM

Thanks Jack for your prompt reply but, reading between the lions, I suspect we're on a par here. I know die casting is a cheap, reliable way to manufacture relatively complex forms and has no mysteries. It's old tech, and therefore very attractive.

I need a casing about 70mm long by 20mm wide and 30mm high. It MUST be extremely robust and light (as always) and cheap to mass produce. (The same old story). The casing has a number of internal support structures for electronic and MEM components.Titanium meets all the design constraints but, as you said, is scary costly. I wondered if there might not be some technique similar to injection moulding that would lend itself to nanoparticles, since they also meet the constraints, particularly the environmental ones.

Register to Reply
Guru
New Zealand - Member - Kiwi Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 8777
Good Answers: 376
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Titanium or nanoparticles?

08/17/2009 4:40 PM

Consider making the outer casing out of strong material like carbon fibre/titanium and the inner materials out of a cheaper and less strong material. The outer casing provides the bulk of the strength and mechanical and environmental protection, and the inner materials provide some strength and vibration support, compression strength, etc.

Best of both wolds, after all you wouldn't make a gun totally out of titanium and carbon fibre, only key parts.

Depending on the device you could also consider filling the device with an epoxy or similar potting compound. It's a very common and cheap way of providing environmental and mechanical protection (it does have its disadvantages such as limited maintenance after device potting)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potting_(electronics)

__________________
jack of all trades
Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 13
#9
In reply to #3

Re: Titanium or nanoparticles?

08/18/2009 12:21 PM

Good thought, and it does, as you say, have some advantages, but I hate 'potted' components. Whenever I want to fix or modify something my bench ends up a battlefield! I'm sure it shows a manufacturers adhesion to the 'disposable' device paradigm. The presence of active MEMs also complicates the process somewhat.

Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electromechanical Engineering - Technical Services Manager Canada - Member - Army brat Popular Science - Cosmology - What is Time and what is Energy? Technical Fields - Architecture - Draftsperson Hobbies - RC Aircraft - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Clive, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5916
Good Answers: 204
#14
In reply to #9

Re: Titanium or nanoparticles?

08/22/2009 9:19 AM

Potting also protects you a bit better from having your products reverse engineered and copied.

and if you think of the end user, out in the field, potting can potentially add to the reliability, and the training, and continued business, because potting ensures that the device is not field repairable.. just replaceable. that makes repair much easier for field techs... and creates higher volume production for you.

from a business case point of view, potting has a lot of pros, and few cons, and if you use the right equipment in your facility, it can be a clean operation with little fuss.

Chris

Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - Musician - New Member Australia - Member - Torn and breading Engineering Fields - Nanoengineering - New Member APIX Pilot Plant Design Project - Member - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Magnetic Island, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 3721
Good Answers: 74
#15
In reply to #14

Re: Titanium or nanoparticles?

08/25/2009 4:40 AM

Hi Chris

Only now did I notice that I got a good answer for this. In hind sight I should have refrained in helping others manufacture weapons (or parts there of). My reply was a Bad Answer and I hope, that what I am trying to do, using this manufacturing technology, will not endanger any human or other life form (avoidably?).

Refusal of a GA? In this case yes. I still wish the OP all the best because every thing starts with procreation and the out comes are very, very unpredictable.

Shoes don't always fit, howzat department? . All the best, Ky.

__________________
The Twain Has Met
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: "Dancing over the abyss."
Posts: 4884
Good Answers: 243
#4
In reply to #2

Re: Titanium or nanoparticles?

08/17/2009 10:06 PM

Depending on how you intend to mount those components. Titanium is a b*tch to thread and machine in general.

Have you looked at metal injection molding? Is stainless steel a possibility, or is weight an important kov?

Whats wrong with magnesium?

Why is it that everything has to be a single piece , but complex as hell? Why not machine the complex as hell geometries, then weld to cheaper to fab simpler geometry casing components.?

I have consulted on materials and methods for manufacture and Quality assurance of parts for _______,_________,________,_____,_____,______safe and many others, and everybody wants to do it out of one piece, instead of optimum for materials, application and fabrication.

Do you have a Mag instruments flashlight? Thats aluminum. a good multi axis 5+ cnc machining center and that ought to be able to produce what you need; In my trade association I have a number of leading companies that could probably produce (not just prototype your parts.

ITARS sensitive, if not Registered.

You can email me provately by clicking on my name above its a link.

milo

__________________
People say between two opposed opinions the truth lies in the middle. Not at all! Between them lies the problem, what is unseeable,eternally active life, contemplated in repose. Goethe
Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - Musician - New Member Australia - Member - Torn and breading Engineering Fields - Nanoengineering - New Member APIX Pilot Plant Design Project - Member - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Magnetic Island, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 3721
Good Answers: 74
#6
In reply to #2

Re: Titanium or nanoparticles?

08/18/2009 4:56 AM

The Artificer

I wondered if there might not be some technique similar to injection moulding that would lend itself to nanoparticles, since they also meet the constraints, particularly the environmental ones.

My suggestion may be way off field but have you ever looked into using glass? It comes with all required properties and can be laser or water jet machined/manufactured. Google 'manufacture technical glass' that should give you a fast response to companies that deal with it. You would be surprised what they can come up with.

If you have CAD files they could do it instantly. I have done some research lately and glass has come up as a winner because of its thermal as well as chemically inert properties.

Contained in a protective SS housing it could take quiet a hit to.

Just a thought, Ky.

__________________
The Twain Has Met
Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#5

Re: Titanium or Carbon Nanoparticles?

08/18/2009 2:49 AM

Did you consider cheap easy manufacturing substrate material and then titanium nitried the part as titanium itself does not have very good wear resistance, harder to manufacture.

Register to Reply
Power-User
Engineering Fields - Manufacturing Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 113
Good Answers: 4
#7

Re: Titanium or Carbon Nanoparticles?

08/18/2009 9:32 AM

Titanium is the way to go. If you would like to get into specifics, please contact me.

Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#8

Re: Titanium or Carbon Nanoparticles?

08/18/2009 11:04 AM

Metal Matrix Composite using Ti/Al/Zr and other formulations is a very good method of manufacturing the components you appear to be looking for.

Powdered metal composites are just now taking on critical applications that appear to be very close to what you are in need of. Look into that area.

S

Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 13
#10
In reply to #8

Re: Titanium or Carbon Nanoparticles?

08/18/2009 12:35 PM

I'm also very interested in the emerging technology of metal nanopowders. It seems to offer a wide range of treatments and techniques and adapts itself to complex forms with ease. I reall just wondered if there were any 'injection moulding' style treatments available for carbon nanos as this would solve all my problems at once(the Holy Grail).

Register to Reply
2
Guru
Hobbies - Musician - New Member Australia - Member - Torn and breading Engineering Fields - Nanoengineering - New Member APIX Pilot Plant Design Project - Member - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Magnetic Island, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 3721
Good Answers: 74
#11
In reply to #10

Re: Titanium or Carbon Nanoparticles?

08/18/2009 5:57 PM
__________________
The Twain Has Met
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Active Contributor

Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 13
#12
In reply to #11

Re: Titanium or Carbon Nanoparticles?

08/18/2009 11:05 PM

KY

That link was a spectacular bulls eye! That's exactly the sort of info I'm looking for! A million thanks.

The Tiff.

Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - Musician - New Member Australia - Member - Torn and breading Engineering Fields - Nanoengineering - New Member APIX Pilot Plant Design Project - Member - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Magnetic Island, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 3721
Good Answers: 74
#13
In reply to #12

Re: Titanium or Carbon Nanoparticles?

08/18/2009 11:57 PM

Good to hear. All the best, Ky.

__________________
The Twain Has Met
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 15 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (2); chrisg288 (1); jack of all trades (2); ky (4); Milo (1); The Artificer (4); Ti QE (1)

Previous in Forum: Nitrogen Plant   Next in Forum: Helium Properties

Advertisement