if a hyperbolic cooling tower turns into cylinderical cooling tower of lesser height than former then how can we increase the efficiency of this cylinderical cooling tower
"if a hyperbolic cooling tower turns into cylinderical cooling tower of lesser height" What do you mean by lesser height. Today a 25000Cum/hr normal flow cooling tower for a 210MW coal fired power station is about 120 meter height. Similarly a 500MW Nuclear power station will need a 100000Cum/hr capacity cooling tower of 165 meter height. What heights are you speaking of?
It is the hyperbolic shape which induces the natural draught. No energy is expended to run them although quite a bit is consumed in building these monsters.
During the initial years there were short height cylinderical cooling towers which were of forced draught design i.e. you had to pump air through the bottom part of the cylinder in order to create the draught. These were later discarded as more efficient induced draught cooling towers were developed & natural draught cooling tower construction took off properly.
Add packing to the tower so as to increase mass transfer rates.
__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856