1-phase: hours x volts x amps x 1/power factor x 1/efficiency of device being powered, or hEI /(pf x eff.)
3-phase: √3 hEI /(pf x eff.)
Those are simplifications based on constant load and balanced current. If the load varies, it becomes ∫t1t2 (EtIt/(pft x eff.t))dt for 1-phase; the subscripts t meaning that these quantities may vary over time. For 3-phase, √3 times all that. (I'm not sure my notation is exact or conventional, but I hope it explains the idea.)
__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
The "1" (which might look like the lower-case letter "L") is just the numeral "one." In other words, the formula uses the reciprocals of pf and eff.
hEI = hours, volts, amps respectively, multiplied together--just rephrasing the word formula from before.
Efficiency applies especially to motors, which may be around 0.85 in small motors to 0.95 or better in large motors. Electrical resistance heaters are 1.00 efficient.
__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
We old timers do not want to unnecessarily catch others slippage . I do it once in a while and since the question was too elementary even for Dr Watson so the mistake correction on post, i didn't feel necessary.
Even my children understand what is the unit, and how it can be calculated. Of course they are too young to be taught about the √3 or cosΦ, only conceptually.
And with so many posts on KW, KVA , Pf and KW or KVA I sometimes feel like screaming when I see a post on it again .
I may resort to a deliberate wrong answer or may be far better I will provide a differential equation using fourier to solve, that will be of course not wrong, but fun.
Well, in that case you probably could really pick me apart! I am by no means a high-level theorist, but I have a notion of Fourier analysis, FFTs, and the like. I'm more of a hands-on type with electrical, hydraulic, and piping experience, with the occasional step up into moderate theory. On CR4 I'm sometimes a prankster, but mostly I try to give ideas that are technically sound at a conceptual level or so. Once in a while I goof, but for the most part I hope I have found a decent balance.
__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.