Can someone finally lay to rest the arguments regarding the use of PVC pipe for compressed air and gases. I have read many statements pro and con for PVC. Some say it shatters, others say they have used it for years and never had a problem.
Schedule 40 PVC is rated at 480 PSI and schedule 80 at 688 PSI, both for ¾" IPS The PSI is based on water at 73°F. What is the difference between 480 PSI (water) and 150 PSI (air)? The PSI for the PVC is 30% of the water PSI. If PVC can handle 480 PSI of water, which is incompressible, then why can't PVC handle a much lower PSI of air?
This is something that needs to be laid to rest once and for all. The want to use PVC is of great financial concern to those who have a lot of compressed air piping within their plant and for home workshop use as well. If mechanical damage to pipe and fittings is the concern, suitable protection is an easy fix.
It would be nice to get an engineering reason for or against PVC for air.
"Almost" Good Answers: