Generator (Slightly Modified) is a Perpetual Motion

like the answer.

Stupid CAT ...
This thread is obviously just a day early and I've been suckered...gullible kitty, you shall have no tea.
I shall sit on the naughty step and ponder my foolishness, but at least the step is still warn, cos Kris has been sat on it for ages
Del

What's the Chinese word for bullsh!t? Maybe Wingman1985 might know?

It's not even good quality bullsh!t . You just can't get the good stuff these days, when I was a lad, you could build whole skyscrapers out of the stuff.
Del

Spoken Yoda hath.

My dear friends, Be kind to me,This is the first important thing in the world, Only if you know Chinese,you won't laugh at me! Two laws has been broken by me!

_{I've broken a few laws, but I normally keep quiet about it
Shhhhh you ain't seen me roight?
Del}

The jig is up, Moriarty.

_{Cuff him, Dano.}

Okay, which two?

v ≤ c

S_t2 ≥ S_t1

ΣE = 0

ΔpΔx ≥ h/4π

Or some others?

Of course we'll laugh, but not at you, just at your "invention". I have a couple unworkable ideas myself, like the gasoline powered rocket I tried building when I was a kid. My mom took this snapshot. It's not too clear, cause she had one of the old 620 film cameras, but, well..

It stinketh and causeth the flowers to GROW!

milo

GA. Are you now encroaching on Shakespeare the Engineer's turf?

3.For my English is poor

Don't worry, it is good enough to convey what you are trying to say.

Now, what someone here SHOULD have replied to you first was the following....

Hello _{<a good start>}

These concepts and designs have been tested, discussed and analysed to death in numerous previous threads on CR4 over the years (including supporting evidence). Additionally you are overlooking key fundamental principles of energy conservation, etc.

Try a search of CR4 using the search function (on the right-hand side of your screen) for key words such as "perpetual", "over-unity" and "generator", as we are not really interested in explaining it all again (9 or 10 times for each variant is enough I think).

A simple translation of your blog (see below if anyone else is interested in reading the original) has offered some insight (taking into account a percentage of translation inaccuracies)

http://babelfish.yahoo.com/translate_url?doit=done&tt=url&intl=1&fr=bf-res&trurl=http%3A%2F%2Fzyaling.blogspot.com%2F&lp=zh_en&btnTrUrl=Translate

Add to the CR4 keyword search "pseudoscience" for more relevant information.

Auto-Translation is bad. Somebody has done my experiment, and has broken the law of conversion of energy. The next work is to increase the free energy. Maybe a month later,A breaking news will spread all over the world!

Auto-Translation is bad

It is good enough in this case.

Somebody has done my experiment, and has broken the law of conversion of energy. The next work is to increase the free energy.

<sigh> If I had a nickel for every time I have heard that.

Virtually ALL experiments showing over-unity and/or perpetual motion are due to bad lab work and measurement errors, the rest are intentional scams. See the numerous previous threads on CR4 regarding how to perform proper verification of your test results, ESPECIALLY if non-sinusoidal or pulse waveforms are involved.

Was something lost in the translation, or something gained? I think the nutty flavor of the translation probably mirrored the original quite well. (I'll try to have Wingman1985 take a look.)

<...broken the law of conversion of energy...>

What's next - prosecution?

I think a couple of year back there was a PMM where some (may be a thousand ) people will be collecting the water downstream and then walking up the hill and depositing the water back to the turbine.

That was actually brilliant.