Previous in Forum: Active Power Saving   Next in Forum: Motor for Cl. 1 Div. 2 Use
Close
Close
Close
17 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Associate

Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 33

Power Factor Panel Problem

11/02/2010 6:35 AM

Dear Engineers I have a problem actually and I need your help 1 week ago I have installed a power factor panel in the factory I am working in. I have attached also two power meters before and after the panel to read the saving I may have(as an experiment) The power meter indicates that I have saving in Amper -FROM 106.8 A(before) to 90 A(after)- which means about 12% savings.. The problem is that in total active power the situation is different the number show no saving but exactly the opposite -total power 2400 kwh(before) to 3700 kwh (after)- which means my bills will increase about 25% but the instant Amper is decreasing I think that the capacitors may recharge the network but in the opposite way please if any1 has an idea just let me know

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Power-User
India - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Asia/India
Posts: 365
Good Answers: 1
#1

Re: Power Factor Panel Problem

11/02/2010 9:33 AM

I guess you are following two part tariff and demand charges are reduced after installing the PF bank.The improved reactive power compensation and voltage stability will improve the efficiency and stability of your power system. I hope the reactive power compensation is done with correct calculation, if it goes wrong also it wont effect active power but reactive power is supplied back to incoming supply making your demand charges high. There is no way of increase in active power charges provided your system was healthy before PFC.

Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: California, USA, where the Godless live next door to God.
Posts: 4665
Good Answers: 804
#2

Re: Power Factor Panel Problem

11/02/2010 1:31 PM

I fear you have unfortunately fallen victim to one of the biggest scams going on out there, that being the pitch that says you will save ENERGY with power factor correction,. It is a lie. You have been taken advantage of by an unscrupulous sales person.

As hithuanand said in his previous post, you may realize some MONEY savings if your tariff system was penalizing you for low power factor, so hopefully you will at least get that benefit.

But if you installed what is called "Bulk PF Correction" as it appears you did, and it is over-correcting the PF, you can in fact over excite motors and cause them to use more energy in the form of heat. Another one that is becoming a more common problem now is the bulk capacitors interacting with capacitor based equipment, such as power supplies, AC and Dc drives, UPS systems etc. This is the primary risk of bulk correction.

A better approach would have been to thoroughly investigate the source of lagging PF contribution and correct it at each specific load, such as any large inductive motors, switching on just enough PF capacitor VARs to correct that particular motor contribution ONLY when it is running. But that is hind sight now.

Does your automatic system have some sort of sensing of the VARs and is stepping in multiple stages of capacitor banks in response? If so, might it be improperly commissioned and is over correcting?

__________________
** All I every really wanted to be, was... A LUMBERJACK!.**
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Associate

Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 33
#5
In reply to #2

Re: Power Factor Panel Problem

11/03/2010 4:01 AM

thnx man I think it is over correcting the problem is using the Ampere meter I have witnessed about 15% savings in Ampere how it could be a scam?

Register to Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Resting under the Major Oak
Posts: 4347
Good Answers: 181
#7
In reply to #5

Re: Power Factor Panel Problem

11/03/2010 5:36 AM

1KWHr = 1KWHr

The only saving to be made is if you're on a tariff that penalises poor power factor. By improving the PF you escape the penalties. Over correction puts you back in the same situation as under correction, you get penalised.

The ammeter is not giving a true reflection of power used.

__________________
The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated.
Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1604
Good Answers: 63
#3

Re: Power Factor Panel Problem

11/02/2010 2:00 PM

Therealabdo

quote "The problem is that in total active power the situation is different the number show no saving but exactly the opposite -total power 2400 kwh(before) to 3700 kwh (after)"

You should have recorded the power factor(PF) prior to installing the capacitors. If so, list the KVA and KW demand and PF before and after the installation. Also provide the size of the capacitor bank installed. As JRaef said, you may have over corrected. If you can list this information we can check the installation. The caps will not affect the KWH usage to any great amount. I am a little confused as to how you measured the KWH reduction. KWH's are measured over a given time period.

Register to Reply
2
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Houston, USA
Posts: 946
Good Answers: 244
#4

Re: Power Factor Panel Problem

11/02/2010 7:27 PM

There are two things here:

1. It appears to me, you have a feeling that the reducing of current value from 106.8A to 90A with the use of PFI (Power Factor Improvement) panel means a saving of energy. This is a wrong concept, may be JRaef's fear is right 'you have unfortunately fallen victim to one of the biggest scams'. The PFI panel is doing what it is supposed to do – for the same load, it is improving the power factor and hence decreasing the current (P = 1.732 x V x I x p.f, the value of p.f increases, so value of I decreases for the same power P). This doesn't mean it is saving your energy consumption. However, it saves energy in the utility side with reducing the line loss due to low current drawn from the utility, and off course, there is no savings happening in your side. You are helping utility with the PFI panel insatlled and that is the reason you may get waive of the penalty from the utility.

2. You mentioned the 'total power 2400 kwh (before) to 3700 kwh (after)'. How do you compare the kwh before and after? Did you record the energy meter for a certain time period with using same load before and after? Make sure you used exactly the same load for the same period of time before and after. If you have KW meter installed, I would suggest you to measure the KW with PFI or without PFI (turning it off) keeping the same amount of load. I would expect a small percentage of increase of KW with the PFI in service, because there will be a sort of energy consumption due to some power loss within the PFI panel, but the difference of energy that you indicated here appears much more, so verify it again with more correct measuring method.

- MS

__________________
"All my technical advices in this forum must be consulted with and approved by a local registered professional engineer before implementation" - Mohammed Samad (Linkedin Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/msamad)
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Associate

Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 33
#6

Re: Power Factor Panel Problem

11/03/2010 4:22 AM

Thnx guys u were very helpful..... Actually I am a Telecom engineer that's why these info u have supplied me are really helpful....... Anyway I have attached 2 power meters, one before the PF and one after it (the PF is installed in parallel with the load)...... here is the readings i got after a while..... Power meter 1 / Power meter 2 Kwh T1 13.7 / 77.0 Kwh T2 11.2 / 63.43 Kwh T3 1.4 / 9.89 Kwh T4 1.089 / 3.7 Kvar 23.45 / 22.5 Kvar 42.0 / 0.319 kw 0.165 / 0.732 A 1.2 / 0.92 A 1.775 / 1.205 V 1.2 / 1.02 Power Meter 1: On the load Power meter 2: On the source , where the saving should be ..... Actually I don't know if it is a scam but I have seen the measurements on a power meter (the company supplied me) and I saw an energy saving ..... u may check this as was introduced to me http://basantec.com/demo.html ....... check the readings

Register to Reply
3
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1013
Good Answers: 36
#8
In reply to #6

Re: Power Factor Panel Problem

11/03/2010 8:08 AM

Since you want to understand the process:

Total Power is called Apparent Power and symbol used is S. Unit is VA (or Volt Ampere) or kVA (kiloVolt Ampere)

Active Power is symbolised as P. Unit is W (or Watt) or kW for kilowatt; while reactive Power is Q. Unit is VAr (or Volt Ampere reactive) or kVAr (as before kilo....)

Now we have the following formula: S = √(P²+Q²)

The PFC panel will ONLY affect your Q consumption (which is not charged even if the meter records it) and the more you consume Q, the lower the PF of your load: goes from 1 to 0.8 to 0.7 etc.

Since Only the Q is affected, The P consumed remains the same and it is the active power. Therefore, the kWh metering remains the same for the same load, no matter what is the PF.

To see this in action: Meter 1 before the PFC panel will be the actual Energy Provider Company Meter. Since you are compensating the reactive power (Q), it will not suply the Q you are providing with the Panel. This Q from the panel, will still be consumed by your load (since it requires it). Therefore, Meter 2 after the panel will read the Q.

Now: If these Meters can display the kVA (S), S1 for Meter1 and S2 for Meter2, You will seethat S1 < S2, While kW1 = kW2 and kVAr1 > kVAr2

the above value are instantaneous and would require the meters to be able to display the Instantaneous values. Normally, Digital electronic meters do that. If Not, then You might be able to read the KVAh, kWh and kVArh values accumulated during a period of time (let us say 24 hours). Then compare in the same way.

S1 = √(P1 + Q1) and S2 = √(P2 + Q2) with P1 = P2

Conclusion: As said before by others, You reduce the Q consumed from the grid and replace it by the Q supplied from the PFC Panel, Therefore improving the PF and reducing from the bill the part related to the Maximum demand penalty ( X amount per KVA max recorded in a billing period). The kWh comsumed remains the same for the same loading. This is active power being metered.

Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 3)
Anonymous Poster
#10
In reply to #6

Re: Power Factor Panel Problem

11/03/2010 9:10 AM

i am totally lost with the way you provided the data.

Richo

Register to Reply
Associate

Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 33
#11
In reply to #10

Re: Power Factor Panel Problem

11/03/2010 9:17 AM

sorry I am new here...and after I have posted it i realized the the button ENTER in not being taken in this forum as JUMP TO A NEW LINE :(

Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#9

Re: Power Factor Panel Problem

11/03/2010 8:35 AM

therealabdo,

Just accept the fact you've been conned, duped, fiddled, taken for a ride.

Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Associate

Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 33
#12
In reply to #9

Re: Power Factor Panel Problem

11/03/2010 9:20 AM

:D ... I was clever enough..actually I am paying nothing..I would pay them by the savings the would cause for me.... I have approximately a constant electricity bill around 2000 $...if my bill comes lower than this number with the same production they takes the savings for about 1.5 year.. I am loosing nothing..but I am curios :D

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Houston, USA
Posts: 946
Good Answers: 244
#15
In reply to #12

Re: Power Factor Panel Problem

11/03/2010 7:09 PM

Therealabdo,

I looked into the website of Basantec (www.basantec.com) and curious about the APSS (Active Power Savings System) product. I never heard this technology before. In this website, the technology described as "APSS is equipped with capacitors that have been put through the process of an Ionic treatment, with a combination of special components and resources, which creates: (1) Superconductivity removing impurities and defects in the cabling network. (2) Negative resistance, which acts as a power source to the electric network".

This is not simply the capacitor bank, works a source of power – no idea where the energy is coming from.

It seems you have the contract with them to see the real savings first and pay if it is really beneficial. There is nothing to loose from your side. Could you please come back with the result and share your experience with this product.

Is anybody else familiar to this technology?

- MS

__________________
"All my technical advices in this forum must be consulted with and approved by a local registered professional engineer before implementation" - Mohammed Samad (Linkedin Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/msamad)
Register to Reply
Associate

Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 33
#17
In reply to #15

Re: Power Factor Panel Problem

11/04/2010 2:19 AM

thnx man I really have done that..no paying till i see saving :D and now i am doing my own experiments..I will keep u updated

Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#13

Re: Power Factor Panel Problem

11/03/2010 9:27 AM

You talk about amperes and Kwh, they are two very different readings, the Kwh will increase as long as you are drawing current as it it measuring the amount of power you are using over a period of time

Register to Reply
Guru
Canada - Member - Specialized in power electronics

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada.
Posts: 1372
Good Answers: 80
#14

Re: Power Factor Panel Problem

11/03/2010 11:04 AM

I suspect that you have your power meter wired incorrectly. Make sure that the voltage and current sensors for corresponding phases are on the same wires and that it is configured properly.

This capacitor bank should reduce the current, the KVARs, and the KVA but the power is not likely to change if the line voltage is almost the same.

The other possibility for increased power if your meters are connected properly is a large increase in line voltage that would increase the power consumption of heaters, lights and motors. Check the line voltage with and without the capacitor bank.

__________________
Experienced is earned, common sense is taught, both are rare essentials of life.
Register to Reply
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#16

Re: Power Factor Panel Problem

11/03/2010 9:02 PM

"APSS is equipped with capacitors that have been put through the process of an Ionic treatment, with a combination of special components and resources, which creates: (1) Superconductivity removing impurities and defects in the cabling network. (2) Negative resistance, which acts as a power source to the electric network".

I think we're familiar enough now... . What a hoot!

Do you have a Better Business Bureau and/or Consumer Protection Division in your locale?

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 17 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (3); hithuanand (1); JRaef (1); LAA_Lucke (1); marcot (1); msamad (2); therealabdo (5); TonyS (1); Tornado (1); wareagle (1)

Previous in Forum: Active Power Saving   Next in Forum: Motor for Cl. 1 Div. 2 Use

Advertisement