Previous in Forum: Transformers???   Next in Forum: Building Good Guitar Amps For Less Than $100
Close
Close
Close
35 comments
Rating: Comments: Nested
Commentator

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: india
Posts: 59

Why Not DC?

12/24/2010 1:08 PM

It is possible to create magnetic field using DC supply. then why not DC supply is used to create mutual induction in transformers??

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
3
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#1

Re: Why not DC?

12/24/2010 3:00 PM

Because it is change in a magnetic field that induces current flow. If the DC is steady, there is no change in a stationary circuit, as in a transformer.

In generator, the magnetic fields are made to move mechanically.

DC can be chopped, as in a Model T circuit interrupter and spark coil. The neighbors would probably hate the radio interference.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 3)
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electromechanical Engineering - Technical Services Manager Canada - Member - Army brat Popular Science - Cosmology - What is Time and what is Energy? Technical Fields - Architecture - Draftsperson Hobbies - RC Aircraft - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Clive, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5916
Good Answers: 204
#4
In reply to #1

Re: Why not DC?

12/24/2010 11:34 PM

totally right. ga.

In order for electrons to be moved in the secondary, the magnetic field of the primary must move (grow and shrink). The magnetic field in the primary only moves when the current varies. Therefore, all coupled coils are effective only with varying currents. (normally associated with varying voltages or AC)

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#2

Re: Why not DC?

12/24/2010 3:21 PM

Quit asking us to do your homework for you.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Virginia, Georgia, Idaho
Posts: 1079
Good Answers: 30
#21
In reply to #2

Re: Why not DC?

12/25/2010 1:07 PM

You can do homework, which is what other people want you to know.

You can wonder about things that may not be in your instructors wheelhouse.

Lynlynch doesn't like homework anymore, and lives in an oyster shell.

Most of us still wonder about things we don't know, so keep asking.

We don't mind not answering if it's too tedious.

__________________
PFR Pressure busts pipes. Maybe you need better pipes.
Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Commentator

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: india
Posts: 59
#22
In reply to #21

Re: Why not DC?

12/25/2010 1:29 PM

thank you and i will

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Power-User

Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 190
Good Answers: 2
#35
In reply to #21

Re: Why not DC?

12/31/2010 7:27 AM

Thank you for that answer. I have knowledge in some areas but not all. My weakest is electricity and I read CR4 specifically to bone up on that knowledge. Sometimes the only thing I understand are the answers to 'home work' questions. I have learned a great deal reading the blogs on CR4 and look forward each day to the questions in my email. This is late because I have been out of town, but felt a reply was in order.

__________________
The time has come the Walrus said to speak of many things, of shoes and ships and sealing wax, of cabbages and kings.
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
2
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - Been there, done that. Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 15600
Good Answers: 981
#3

Re: Why not DC?

12/24/2010 4:47 PM

Because a transformer is not a designed component to just make a magnetic field. A solenoid magnet is a designed component to make a magnetic field. Solenoids work with AC or DC voltages. A transformer is a designed component to produce a different AC voltage or current than what enters the transformer. Now a transformer is constructed by making two solenoids that have a common magnetic core.

Now why a static magnetic field (DC primary) will not induce a current in solenoid coils gets to be either a metaphysical or philosophical discussion on the nature of the universe that requires a firm grasp of multi-variant Calculus and classical and quantum mechanics. Along the way to obtaining a doctoral degree in Physics to pursue this debate you will find that several brilliant Physicists noticed this relationship between electric and magnetic fields and fabricated multidimensional mathematical relationships that accurately agree with the observed phenomena. These laws were so fundamental to our understanding of electro-magnetism that Lenz, Faraday, Gauss, and several others were honored by naming the law they codified or that their name became a unit in this field.

Now we've already discussed that one of the laws with one of these gentleman's names does express that an output voltage will not appear with a fixed magnetic field in the core. But to be perfectly accurate that is an observational law not a reason why the law is true. Some will say it is because God willed it so. Some cosmologists will say that the universe itself would not have formed if this was not true. A few cosmologists have suggested that previous universes that didn't confirm to these laws collapsed before our stable universe was created. A few cosmologists suggest that alternate universes that have different physical laws exist in the same space as our universe but with the possible exception of the effects we call dark matter and dark energy these universes don't interact with our universe at all.

You might as well ask why is it that we must eat to survive. I don't know why but I am getting hungry. I do know that your precise question is asked in the very rarefied realms of Physics research. But everyone qualified to debate this question have an exceptional grasp of the fundamental laws of electromagnetics that you clearly lack.

__________________
"Don't disturb my circles." translation of Archimedes last words
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Commentator

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: india
Posts: 59
#5
In reply to #3

Re: Why not DC?

12/24/2010 11:36 PM

I did't say transformers used to produce magnetic field and you yourself said a solenoid magnet is a designed component to make a magnetic field and it works with both AC and DC.All i know is whenever current flows through a conductor a magnetic field is produced around it weather it is AC or DC. clear me here you are saying that you cannot produce a magnetic field with DC supply to a solenoid and it cannot be induced in other conductor.

Register to Reply
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#6
In reply to #5

Re: Why not DC?

12/24/2010 11:45 PM

Please reread posts 1 and 4; they should be really easy to understand. Also, your tagline saying "everybody lies" is offensively silly.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: india
Posts: 59
#7
In reply to #6

Re: Why not DC?

12/25/2010 12:14 AM

I understand everything you said but please read my reply to post 3 and give me an answer.

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 6)
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#10
In reply to #7

Re: Why not DC?

12/25/2010 12:53 AM

I, and others, already did. A steady DC current to a solenoid (or other winding) does create a magnetic field, but it is an unchanging field. This is dead simple, but clearly you did not understand it.

If you wish to give up, I encourage that in strong terms. Try some other line of work. And, once again, please ditch your offensive tagline.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 160
Good Answers: 2
#12
In reply to #6

Re: Why not DC?

12/25/2010 7:32 AM

I agree with the others. It is very simple, a CHANGING magnetic field induces a current. cant get any simpler than this.

__________________
Shawn P. Galloway
Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - HAM Radio - CE3AM....4X4SW....CE3NSW

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Santiago Chile.
Posts: 845
Good Answers: 7
#24
In reply to #6

Re: Why not DC?

12/25/2010 2:02 PM

Re Tag line 100% agree. "Silly"...too soft.

He is not even original as he is trying to appear...And actually he is biting his own tongue.

The famous Greek philosopher Solon of Athens, is the one who deserve the credit, He said:

"All Greeks are lier's. I am A Greek."

So dear Mallar, draw your own conclusions.

__________________
Never trade luck for skill.
Register to Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: india
Posts: 59
#25
In reply to #24

Re: Why not DC?

12/25/2010 2:33 PM

no offence see i have taken out that tag "everybody lies".

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
Hobbies - HAM Radio - CE3AM....4X4SW....CE3NSW

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Santiago Chile.
Posts: 845
Good Answers: 7
#28
In reply to #25

Re: Why not DC?

12/26/2010 9:27 AM

good for you!

__________________
Never trade luck for skill.
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - Analog and Digital Circuit Design Engineering Fields - Electromechanical Engineering - Transformers, Motors & Drives, EM Launchers Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Applied Electrical, Optical, and Mechanical

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 1207
Good Answers: 119
#8

Re: Why not DC?

12/25/2010 12:19 AM

Answer is already given, but you should read and try to understand

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inductance#Coupled_inductors

as it provides a good fundamental description.

Register to Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: india
Posts: 59
#9
In reply to #8

Re: Why not DC?

12/25/2010 12:24 AM

k guys i give up

Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
4
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 1975
Good Answers: 117
#11
In reply to #9

Re: Why not DC?

12/25/2010 1:07 AM

Thats fine. No doubt you will be able to find other explanations and other teachers in the years ahead. Rest assured that nobody has told you any thing which is not accurate. Failure to understand lies within yourself, you need a more fundamental understanding of magnetic fields and the nature of electricity.

Perhaps an experiment might be helpful. Take an insulated wire of any gauge and wind it into a coil. Add in a switch and a battery, and a light bulb. Connect them all in series. When you close the switch, the light will come on. Now, run another wire down through the centre of the coil. Connect the wire to a light bulb. No batteries or switches...just the wire and the lightbulb in series.

Now when close the switch, the second lightbulb will flash, but not stay on.

Ponder this phenomon, and compare it to the statement "only a change in voltage will cause induction".

Please, it is easy to do. There is no reason not do such a simple experiment. If you truly want to learn, you will do that. This forums residents will cheer you on.

__________________
If it was easy anybody could do it.
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 4)
Guru
Popular Science - Evolution - New Member

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: India-Chennai.
Posts: 722
Good Answers: 30
#15
In reply to #9

Re: Why not DC?

12/25/2010 9:51 AM

Edison's favorite was DC but he gave up to AC finally for these reasons mostly.

__________________
A picture worth thousand words: needless to say if it is animated.
Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electromechanical Engineering - Technical Services Manager Canada - Member - Army brat Popular Science - Cosmology - What is Time and what is Energy? Technical Fields - Architecture - Draftsperson Hobbies - RC Aircraft - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Clive, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5916
Good Answers: 204
#19
In reply to #15

Re: Why not DC?

12/25/2010 11:23 AM

I don't think Edison ever gave up... which is why we can't find Tesla in the history and invention books.

Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - Been there, done that. Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 15600
Good Answers: 981
#20
In reply to #19

Re: Why not DC?

12/25/2010 12:20 PM

But there is no unit of an Edison. Those who can appreciate Tesla's genius know his work.

__________________
"Don't disturb my circles." translation of Archimedes last words
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1895
Good Answers: 44
#34
In reply to #15

Re: Why not DC?

12/30/2010 11:17 AM

I'd point out he was forced to AC by necessity and lack of funding. He hated it.

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Power-User

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 284
Good Answers: 18
#13

Re: Why Not DC?

12/25/2010 9:13 AM

The short answer is YES, transformers CAN be (and ARE) used with DC power supplies. The DC supplies have to be SWITCHED, though. The principal problem with using transformers with switched DC supplies is signal distortion if the switching frequency's too rapid: the square-wave primary signal comes out more and more as an exponential-shaped one as frequency increases. The secondary signal looks like the voltage between the terminals of a capacitor in an RC (resistor-capacitor) signal switched to a DC battery. (Someday I'll figure out how to add diagrams to my messages here.) That being said, special high-frequency transformers are frequently used to isolate circuits in which square-wave signals (digital information bits or chopped power-supply signals) circulate. Such applications includes: communications, where baluns ('balanced-unbalanced'), which serve to match/transform the different impedances of communications channels (cables, waveguides); uninterruptible/electronic power supplies, in which mains AC power and backup DC power (from batteries) gets converted to DC, switched at fairly high frequencies (for transformers), for example 400 Hz, and then reconverted to 50/60 Hz AC; and others. So, people: remember the aphorism "There are no stupid questions, only stupid answers." In this case ... uuuuhhh .. uuummmm ... :-S Don't slag the askers of questions! DreadZontar

__________________
Do unto others. Then run.
Register to Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: india
Posts: 59
#14
In reply to #13

Re: Why Not DC?

12/25/2010 9:48 AM

thak you very much sir.now i am pretty clear...

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 284
Good Answers: 18
#17
In reply to #14

Re: Why Not DC?

12/25/2010 10:37 AM

Pleasure's all mine. :-) DZ

__________________
Do unto others. Then run.
Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - Been there, done that. Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 15600
Good Answers: 981
#16

Re: Why Not DC?

12/25/2010 10:24 AM

There is one thing not mentioned here that people have overlooked. DC can effect how well a transformer works. Here is a thought experiment to demonstrate.

Say that a transformer that takes 1 ampere of RMS AC current at 120V (these acronyms should be obvious) at some pure sinusoidal frequency produces and converts this to 6VAC RMS pure sinusoidal wave and 20 amperes of current into an appropriate load. If the load is reduced the core saturates and the current limits to 21 amperes of current and an examination of the voltage with an oscilloscope will show a distorted sine wave on the secondary but nothing significantly different in the primary voltage sine wave. Now, when one goes back to the correct load the secondary waveform returns to the 6VAC 20 ampere pure sine wave. If one adds a DC 0.5 current to the 1 ampere RMS AC current on the primary side of the transformer then one will get less than the 20 amperes of current on the output side. Looking at the secondary voltage waveform with an oscilloscope one will see that one half of the sine wave (above or below 0) looks fine. However, the other side of the waveform will look like the earlier saturated core waveform.

So DC can affect an AC coupling signal though a transformer but the DC component itself does not propagate through. A critical thing this thought experiment set up was that the AC signal was close to saturating the core. If the core is not close to saturation, then no change in the AC signal output will happen with a DC primary additional current until somewhere the core saturates. At no time though does a DC signal appear on the secondary.

__________________
"Don't disturb my circles." translation of Archimedes last words
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Anonymous Poster
#18

Re: Why Not DC?

12/25/2010 11:17 AM

As stated in a reply to induce current and get voltage in the output (secondary) of a transformer the magnetic field must be changing, increasing or decreasing as in an AC wave where the current in the driven coil (primary) is changing and this magnetic field continuously increases and decreases and comes in contact with the secondary coil inducing a current. As in many DC-DC or DC-AC converters like used in a vehicle from the 12 VDC battery circuitry chops the DC resulting in a change. This chopping might be at 400 Hz or even 60 Hz or even 50 kHz. The higher the freq the easer to filter to make a higher DC voltage supply. Like in the old days of tubes that required 200-1000VDC to operate DC-DC supplies were made, but the primary 12 VDC had to be chopped. First used was a DC motor driving a generator (dynomotor), then a vibrator which was a simple relay that when turned on turned itself off which turning it back on and it set there vibrating chopping the DC so it could be fed to a transformer to step up the voltage. Next came the transistor oscillator for this and is still used in the DC-AC converters. Next came transistors that normally work very well on 12 VDC and all this chopping business went away.

Register to Reply
2
Power-User

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 390
Good Answers: 82
#23

Re: Why Not DC? Yes, the DC Bus Converter.

12/25/2010 1:47 PM

If you rephrase your question, why can't we make a "DC transformer", the answer is, yes, indeed we can. It's really a form of DC-DC converter, internally using AC magnetic fields, but externally appearing as a DC transformer.

It has a "turns ratio", N, which works both ways, step up by N or step down 1/N, depending on which side you make an input, by connecting power. And it has the expected current ratio, also depending on N, e.g. IIN = N IOUT for step up. The "transformer turns-ratio" parameter N is adjustable, and is set by the duty cycle of the MOSFET switches.

These DC transformers are made from what look like buck (or boost) converters, with synchronous switches (MOSFETs) replacing the usual diode (the MOSFET switch allows current to flow both directions when closed, which a diode cannot do). Using MOSFETs instead of diodes is common for low-voltage converters, but these, sometimes called Bus Converters, are different. Bus Converters have a fixed duty cycle, rather than a feedback loop adjusting the duty cycle to servo the output voltage. This fixed duty cycle means the input and output will have a fixed "unregulated" voltage ratio. The Bus Converter name implies that you take power from a bus, with voltage A, and create a new bus, with voltage B. Hence, Bus Converter.

With power from the left, you can see the circuit as a classic buck converter, or switching things around in your imagination, with power from the right, you can see it as a boost converter.

In my Bus-Converter designs I've used the IR2085 PWM control chip, with a modified connection to the internal oscillator to allow for a wider duty cycle adjustment range. I've also use a simplified configuration, tying the input and output grounds together to allow the use of an inductor, and with no transformer.

My circuit included a current limit plus a fuse for safety. The PCB uses "faston" clips for sides A and B. The large parts are on top, and the IC, resistors, diodes, etc., are smt parts on the bottom (not shown).

The circuit acts as a perfect DC transformer, either way, with an added series resistance, analogous to the copper winding resistance in an AC transformer. In this case the loss resistance is partially due to the MOSFETs RDS(on) resistance, and primarily due to the dead-time when neither the HI-side nor the LOW-side MOSFETs are turned on (the dead-time insures both MOSFETs won't be on at the same time, causing high supply-rail shoot-through currents). The IR2085 has a fairly-short adjustable dead-time of 50 to 200ns.

For MOSFETs I used IRFZ46Z, which are rated at VDSS = 55V and ID to 51A. I could use the converter up to 55V, on the higher-voltage side, except I usually install 35V electrolytic capacitors (the IR2085 has a bus-voltage limit of 100V). That version of my circuit will work from low voltages, just a volt or two, up to say 30 volts. Despite its simplicity, it's fairly powerful. For example, if I set N=0.5 and use it for 28V to 14V conversion at up to 10A, that's 280 watts.

__________________
Thanks, Win
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electromechanical Engineering - Technical Services Manager Canada - Member - Army brat Popular Science - Cosmology - What is Time and what is Energy? Technical Fields - Architecture - Draftsperson Hobbies - RC Aircraft - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Clive, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5916
Good Answers: 204
#29
In reply to #23

Re: Why Not DC? Yes, the DC Bus Converter.

12/26/2010 11:54 AM

obviously a very thoughtful contribution. I'm not qualified to judge the accuracy, but I certainly a stimulating post nevertheless. ga.

Chris

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 390
Good Answers: 82
#33
In reply to #29

Re: Why Not DC? Yes, the DC Bus Converter.

12/27/2010 1:22 PM

Thanks Chris. Yes, it is thought provoking. A DC transformer? Hah, got my brain going at any rate! BTW the DC transformer responds to AC as well, perhaps up to few kHz (it's limited to some fraction of the switching frequency, which might be 50 or 100kHz). I say AC, but that's AC riding on top of DC, because the circuit can't work with bipolar signals, at least not without adding a few more parts. What to do with such a capability, who knows?

But the DC Bus-Converter part of the idea is extremely useful. For example, start out with a standard high-power off-line to 28V converter, and generate all kinds of other useful high-current supply voltages. For example, we used three Bus Converters to create the ideal odd amplifier supply voltages needed for driving 3-axis magnetic-field coils.

Another useful idea, a bipolar power supply. Start with a say 72-volt off-line DC supply, hook up a Bus Converter with the duty cycle set to 50%, for 36V, which creates a center tap for the 72V supply. Now ground that center tap, and you have a +/-36V high-current power supply, perfect for use with a home-made stereo audio amplifier (2x 125 watts into 4 ohms). This works because the Bus Converter as a center tap is happy both sourcing and sinking current, as required for your speaker ground.

__________________
Thanks, Win
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: May 2010
Location: in optimism
Posts: 4050
Good Answers: 130
#26

Re: Why Not DC?

12/25/2010 7:28 PM

It is - provided you "switch" the dc 'alternately' (plus and minus) before the transformer. Basic designs

This, if you like, is a 'rotary dc transformer' rotary converters

Perhaps you'd like to study the people who Discovered all this 'alternating dc transformer' stuff? Faraday, Henry, Callan,

__________________
There is no sin except stupidity. (Oscar Wilde, Irish dramatist, novelist, & poet (1854 - 1900))
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Associate

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 26
Good Answers: 1
#27

Re: Why Not DC?

12/26/2010 6:18 AM

DC power can produce the constant magnetic field but changeable magnetic field required to induce EMF. AC power magnetic fields changeable according to supply frequency.

Register to Reply
Participant

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
Posts: 3
#30

Re: Why Not DC?

12/27/2010 8:05 AM

The flux produced by DC is Constant i.e. not alternating. According to faraday's law either conductor or flux must be in motion. Transformer is static so windings r also Stationary. If we use d.c. there will be no emf induction n there's also possibility of burning of winding coz reactance offered to d.c. will be less for winding designed for a.c.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Land of Shining Waters
Posts: 916
Good Answers: 35
#31

Re: Why Not DC?

12/27/2010 9:48 AM

No one has mentioned the most common DC "transformer" - the automobile ignition system. Collapsing magnetic field - 12 VDC to 30,000 volt pulses.

__________________
It is easier to let the cat out of the bag than to put the cat back in the bag.
Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electromechanical Engineering - Technical Services Manager Canada - Member - Army brat Popular Science - Cosmology - What is Time and what is Energy? Technical Fields - Architecture - Draftsperson Hobbies - RC Aircraft - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Clive, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5916
Good Answers: 204
#32
In reply to #31

Re: Why Not DC?

12/27/2010 11:53 AM

because that operates on a changing magnetic field. the large voltage is generated the 'collapse' aka rapid change in the magnetic field.

Chris

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 35 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

34point5 (1); anand14rocks (1); Anonymous Poster (1); canadianslidewinder (1); chrisg288 (4); cuba_pete (1); DreadZontar (2); lyn (1); malar (6); Michael Rock (1); mjb1962853 (1); PFR (1); redfred (3); sukumar75 (1); toolman911965 (1); Tornado (3); wangito (2); Winfield Hill (2); yesyen (1); Yusef1 (1)

Previous in Forum: Transformers???   Next in Forum: Building Good Guitar Amps For Less Than $100

Advertisement