Previous in Forum: charging Current .....differential Relay   Next in Forum: FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS! MINING!
Close
Close
Close
17 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Member

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 7

Electrical Loads Assessment

01/05/2011 3:19 PM

I have little dilema and hope you may help to solve.

We are expecting the arrival of 8 machines (we already have 5 )and 15 would be identical.

Now, thinking about our power transformers and if they can support entire loads KEEPING the same 100% redundancy we have

Two transformers connected via bus coupler and it is designed that each would serve entire loads in case other is out of service.

Interesting point is each transformer is 1.5 MVA , main CB 2500 but coupler 1600.

Nominal of each machine is 71 KVA (though drawn amp. / each actually never exceeded 60) is there any reason that actual could be much less nominal?

While I do total connected load algebric sum of VA, how do I compensate loads that are not supposed to work entire shift. For example compressor (loading / unloading)

Is there any factor?

One last question. There are records of energy (Kwh) on medium side that shows consumption / month.

It can be accurate that I divide this energy by the number of working days by working hours to get "P" in Kw.

I hope you can help with these questions.

Thanks.

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1686
Good Answers: 116
#1

Re: Electrical Loads Assessment

01/05/2011 3:53 PM
  1. You know the voltage of the machines, but you have not told US.....
  2. CB ratings are usually amps, but cannot be compared with kVA loads without voltage.....
Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 7
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Electrical Loads Assessment

01/05/2011 3:57 PM

Sorry,it is just where i live in the world voltage is 380 (Line-Line)

thanks for your concern

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1686
Good Answers: 116
#8
In reply to #1

Re: Electrical Loads Assessment

01/06/2011 7:36 AM

Thanks, numbers are :-

  1. 71 kVA x 15 machines = 1065 kVA.
  2. (1065/0.38)/1.732 = 1618 amps /phase.
  3. 1065 kVA on one 1500 kVA transfo is OK.
  4. Machines run at 60 kVA, distinctly less than 71 kVA rated. 15 x 60 = 900 kVA.
  5. Even if all machines fed through bus coupler (1600 amp), no problem, considering 2. and 4.
  6. Machines started separately, not together - 8 x full load is 568 kVA. Note 568 + 900 = 1468. Compare transfo rating 1500 kVA - no voltage drop or rating problems.

Is question answered OK?

Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Anonymous Poster
#10
In reply to #8

Re: Electrical Loads Assessment

01/06/2011 5:40 PM

thanks alot...

Register to Reply
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#3

Re: Electrical Loads Assessment

01/05/2011 4:24 PM

If the (15) machines are divided about equally on each side of the bus tie breaker, this ought to work. (The bus tie breaker needs to support only whichever fraction of the loads is a bit higher than half.)

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1604
Good Answers: 63
#4

Re: Electrical Loads Assessment

01/05/2011 7:41 PM

Quote Eagle Wings "one last question, there are records of energy (Kwh) on medium side that shows consumption / month it can be accurate that i divide this energy by no.of working days by working hours to get "P"in Kw.."

No. It will give you a number but it likely won't be the peak. Suggest you get a recording meter to determine the actual peak load. If you are metered on a kw demand billing, the utility will have that information.

Example demand 1000 watts for 1 hr is 1000 kwh and a peak of 1000 watts

demand 1 watt for 1000 hrs is 1000 kwh and peak is 1 watt.

Both give you the same kwh's but significant difference in peak demand.

Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Marine Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 1630
Good Answers: 20
#5

Re: Electrical Loads Assessment

01/05/2011 11:41 PM

We are expecting the arrival of 8 machines (we already have 5 )and 15 would be identical.

I am in no way capable of answering your question, however I just wondered about your statement in italics, to me it does not work out mathematically????

__________________
TO BE. or NOT TO BE. That is the question!! The Bard
Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#6
In reply to #5

Re: Electrical Loads Assessment

01/06/2011 12:54 AM

8 + 5 = 13.

15-13 = 2.

13 + 2 = 15 (Identical)

2 machines will come later, may be next year.

Mathematically solved.

Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Marine Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 1630
Good Answers: 20
#7
In reply to #6

Re: Electrical Loads Assessment

01/06/2011 1:20 AM

Yep..............real convincing!!!!!!!

__________________
TO BE. or NOT TO BE. That is the question!! The Bard
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1895
Good Answers: 44
#9
In reply to #6

Re: Electrical Loads Assessment

01/06/2011 11:20 AM

wow...

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
2
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1686
Good Answers: 116
#11

Re: Electrical Loads Assessment

01/08/2011 2:43 PM

One last question unanswered:-

Nominal of each machine is 71 KVA (though drawn amp. / each actually never exceeded 60) is there any reason that actual could be much less nominal?

  1. Next machine size down did not meet running load, hence supplied machine is not at full load.
  2. Next machine size down did not meet starting load.
  3. Designer considered efficiency at running load to save running costs (motor maximum efficiency is at less than full load).
  4. Designer considered benefit for life and reliability of reduced insulation temperature etc at part load (roughly, motor at 80% load has 0.8 x 0.8 = 0.64 times rated temperature rise above ambient).

The world being what it is, these are in order of probability...

Often, the truth is that the designer worked out the maximum running load at the lowest specified temperature and took the next motor size up. Even though motor ratings are standard at 40 Celsius ambient and you can actually push them harder at lower ambients, certainly until fluids have warmed up to normal.

Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Guru
Engineering Fields - Marine Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 1630
Good Answers: 20
#12
In reply to #11

Re: Electrical Loads Assessment

01/09/2011 2:38 AM

My knowledge in electrical engineering is fairly limited, to say the least.

__________________
TO BE. or NOT TO BE. That is the question!! The Bard
Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Marine Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 1630
Good Answers: 20
#13
In reply to #12

Re: Electrical Loads Assessment

01/09/2011 2:48 AM

...........it also appears that my knowledge of computers is on a par with my electrical knowledge...........I pressed the wrong button..........twice............forgive me, it must have been a seniors moment...............or as my grandson reminds me........."old timers"

Now getting back to what I wanted to ask..............Is what you pointed out in your answer to the original question, aligned to the power factor in any way? I just felt it may have.

__________________
TO BE. or NOT TO BE. That is the question!! The Bard
Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 7
#14
In reply to #11

Re: Electrical Loads Assessment

01/10/2011 4:17 AM

i really appreciate the answer ,for me it was a bit weird this big difference between nominal and "actual"

it was a concern in the plant if we need buy higher transformers or not

the calculations based on total connected load (specially they need keep 100% redundanccy between two transformer with bus coupler)

doing algebric sum without any diversity factor makes it necessary to replace the 2*1.5 MVA with 2*3 ,we have other loads fed not only these machines

could the energy consumption make any sense?

i noticed the monthly Kwh over a year and highest value was 314,000 Kwh

meter placed on the MV ,it is the drawn by the two transformer ( and i can assume they are equally loaded)

could this help to determine the "reserve" on each one ?then compared to the new demand to check?

hope you can help again

thans

Register to Reply
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#15
In reply to #14

Re: Electrical Loads Assessment

01/10/2011 4:22 AM

I'm sorry to say this, but you don't seem to have any idea what you are telking/asking about.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1686
Good Answers: 116
#17
In reply to #14

Re: Electrical Loads Assessment

01/10/2011 2:26 PM

You did not say there were other loads of any consequence! This was major omission, it is the total load that matters!

Regarding the adequacy of transformers:-

  1. it is the Volt x Amps and the power factor which decide the voltage drops due to regulation and motor starting. The kWh alone does not reveal this.
  2. Diurnal and Seasonal variations of load and ambient temperature are important for transformer life and overload capacity.
  3. A transformer to IEC76/BS171 is rated at 40 Celsius - in many locations such a temperature is rarely reached. Roughly speaking, the life expectancy of decades is based on a mean ambient of 15 Celsius/Oil temperature 75, over life.
  4. Overload capacity of oil-filled transformers is considerable and the effect of overload on life may be negligible if overloads are when the ambient is low or are compensated by periods below full load. There was a section in BS171/IEC76 dealing with overload ratings and their effect on life.
  5. Your transformers will normally run at ~50% rating, it is realistic to consider a degree of temporary overload when only one transfo is operating, so long as you do not get motor starting trouble due to voltage dips. In any case, the duration of a motor start is a "fleabite" to an elephant in heating up an oil-filled transfo.

Assuming the extra loads to the motors (which you did not give, please advise) hold no deleterious effect, I believe you are in a situation where some thought about your present and future load patterns and some finding, recording and logging of information could avoid an expensive and disruptive transformer change (not to mention switchgear, cables etc).

You need to find out all the metering you have in place which could give you relevant information and cost of extra meters or recorders - their cost will be far less than new transformers. You must have existing records of when and for how long motors have run, how many together etc - if not, it is information you ought to have for maintenance. A few pointers :-

  1. kW-hour readings each hour every day should give you a load pattern, the longer you record, the more reliable and useful. It is very important to talk with the operations/production department so you know when readings are usual/abnormal. Some thought to the loads you have could give a good idea of how many motors are running and the corresponding kVA load. Separate instruments for your "housekeeping" load, distinct from the motors you mention, would help (kW-h at least, may be in various locations of which you are not yet aware).
  2. Transformers may have oil or winding temperature indicators you can read regularly - these have indicators, alarms and protective shutdowns because they have great effect on life.
  3. A simple thermometer in a proper housing on your site will give ambient temperatures. You may already have records. There may be a monitoring site nearby from which useful historic data is available - contact your national meteorological institute.
Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 7
#16

Re: Electrical Loads Assessment

01/10/2011 4:24 AM

really appreciate the answer ,for me it was a bit weird this big difference between nominal and "actual"

it was a concern in the plant if we need buy higher transformers or not

the calculations based on total connected load (specially they need keep 100% redundanccy between two transformer with bus coupler)

doing algebric sum without any diversity factor makes it necessary to replace the 2*1.5 MVA with 2*3 ,we have other loads fed not only these machines

could the energy consumption make any sense?

i noticed the monthly Kwh over a year and highest value was 314,000 Kwh

meter placed on the MV ,it is the drawn by the two transformer ( and i can assume they are equally loaded)

could this help to determine the "reserve" on each one ?then compared to the new demand to check?

hope you can help again

thans

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 17 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

67model (4); Anonymous Poster (2); cuba_pete (1); Eagle_wings (3); MOBI (4); Tornado (2); wareagle (1)

Previous in Forum: charging Current .....differential Relay   Next in Forum: FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS! MINING!

Advertisement