Previous in Forum: CT Ratio in Hydropower Plant   Next in Forum: Why is the Copper Wire in a Carbon Brush Connec....
Close
Close
Close
7 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Member

Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6

Difference Between Grid Connected and Standalone Wind Energy Conversion Systems

09/04/2011 5:31 AM

Hi, I would like to know the basic difference in the control strategy in the case of Grid-connected WECS and Stand alone systems. I was able to find a lot of information in terms of the speed-control, converter control etc. for Grid Connected systems but not in the case of stand-alone systems. I am not really clear on the (need for) d-q control of inverter.. Is it needed in the case of stand-alone systems? I would like to know if there are any papers that talk about the difference in terms of control in Stand-alone WECS and Grid-connected WECS.

Aditya

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#1

Re: Difference Between Grid Connected and Standalone Wind Energy Conversion Systems

09/04/2011 8:54 PM

One key for a grid-connected system is that you need to synchronize your input to the grid. This may entail some minimum threshold of your power before connecting to the grid, as well as a synchronizing means. A stand-alone system system can work without these features.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Member

Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Difference Between Grid Connected and Standalone Wind Energy Conversion Systems

09/04/2011 10:06 PM

Yes, that is one key difference. I would also like to point out that in Grid Connected WECS , there are often equations for independent active and reactive power control. I would like to know WHY this is necessary in the case of Grid-connection. Will these be needed in the case of Stand-alone loads?

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bengaluru, India
Posts: 128
Good Answers: 3
#3

Re: Difference Between Grid Connected and Standalone Wind Energy Conversion Systems

09/04/2011 11:29 PM

In stand alone system also we need frequency and voltage control as the loads usually are rated to work at rated voltage and frequency.

A PQ control is essential for voltage regulation. The VSC based systems can supply as well as absorb Q depending on the size of DC side capacitor size

__________________
Dr.Raghunatha Ramaswamy - We discover nothing new other than knowledge
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
2
Guru
Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2007
Location: NYC metropolitan area.
Posts: 3230
Good Answers: 444
#4

Re: Difference Between Grid Connected and Standalone Wind Energy Conversion Systems

09/05/2011 1:13 AM

There are a few key differences between Grid-connected (paralleled) and Stand-alone (isolated) operation of any alternating current generation. The two primary variables that you can control from any unloaded ac source are its frequency and output voltage. When you are grid-connected the power system that you are connected to is many times larger (known as an "infinite bus" in utility talk) than your small system meaning that the frequency and the voltage at your connection point are at the mercy of the utility. Just prior to synchronization with the utility you must have your frequency and voltage identical to that of the utility, and the voltage phasors exactly in sync; i.e., the peak or zero crossing of your voltage sinewave has to occur at exactly the same time as the utility's peak or zero crossing. Your generator now pushes power out to the grid because your generator is running slightly faster than the utility (in the case of an induction generator), the voltage phasor is leading the system voltage phasor, known as the power angle (in the case of a synchronous generator), or your inverter control system voltage firing angle is leading the utility voltage phasor (just like a synchronous generator). Please note that the power angle is not to be confused with the power factor, more on this next. The other variable is the terminal voltage, which does affect the power factor; simply put as your control system attempts to raise the voltage above the utility voltage you start supplying VARs (Volt-Amp-Reactive) to the system. Conversely if it allows the voltage to fall below the utility then you are absorbing VARs from the grid.

All this discussion about generator voltage being "above" or "below" the utility voltage refers to the excitation level of the generator; another way to think about it is to imagine opening the connection between the generator and grid and comparing the the terminal voltage to the utility voltage- generator voltage higher = VARs out, lower generator voltage = VARs in, matched voltages = no VARs (unity power factor). By now you should be saying "...but wait, there is no excitation system inside my inverter, since there's no field, rotating mass, or iron to energize, how do I even measure or control the power angle and/or the power factor?" That's where your d-q control comes in, d stands for direct (real) power, q for quadrature (imaginary) power; d-q control affects the magnitude/timing of the firing pulses to the converter circuitry. Magnitude affects the height/width of the pulses and hence the output voltage, and timing affects where the peak/zero crossing occurs and therefore the power angle.

For Stand-alone systems there are generally two very similar modes of operation, isolated or isochronous. They both refer to the type of frequency control exhibited by the generator, the main difference being that an isolated generator tends to have poorer frequency control so that its frequency falls and rises as the load rises and falls whereas an isochronous generator has a tighter frequency control since it has a timebase controller that forces (up to its rated power) a relatively constant frequency.

The last piece of the puzzle is the nature of the loads. When grid-connected, the grid sets the frequency and voltage that your system feeds, and the constant minute variations in load, frequency and voltaqe are shared proportionately by the size of the generation. In stand-alone mode the generator/inverter must respond to every change in the nature of the load; i.e., if additional load comes on then your control system has to increase the real and/or reactive power while attempting to hold the frequency relatively constant. It's a real interesting balancing act, one that utilities are quite adept at, that when coupled with the widely varying input of the wind, results in a control strategy that requires quite a bit of sophistication.

So to answer your question, unless your loads are constant, real power, and frequency/voltage insensitive; i.e., resistive only, you're going to need some form of variable d-q control. There's plenty of stuff in Google about how to connect the various types of WECS.

__________________
“Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.” Ben Franklin.
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Member

Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 6
#5
In reply to #4

Re: Difference Between Grid Connected and Standalone Wind Energy Conversion Systems

09/05/2011 3:58 AM

Wow! That was a great answer. It was quite thought-provoking. Slightly off-topic , I just want to confirm if I've understood something.

To recap:

We need d-q control to control the P-Q power flow. This is done by controlling the firing pulses to the inverter. We need this in all cases except for purely resitive load in which case, frequency variation isn't a primary concern.

Also , veering slightly off-topic,

Assuming a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generator (fixed excitation), is connected to the grid directly. How would the exchange of VARs be decided? If it runs at the synchronous speed and the voltages are synchronized at the time of hooking up the generator and the grid, is it right in saying that no VARs are exchanged? Since power angle is zero ? (is there a flaw in my logic here)

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Power-User

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bengaluru, India
Posts: 128
Good Answers: 3
#6
In reply to #5

Re: Difference Between Grid Connected and Standalone Wind Energy Conversion Systems

09/05/2011 4:16 AM

You must read something about FACTS - Flexible AC transmission systems and VSC voltage source converters and PWM pulse width modulation. All these are used in present day Wind energy systems.

AC power flow follows the standard AC flow equations and power control is done through controlling the voltage magnitude or voltage angle as the case may be, subject to the limitations imposed by the AC system and the converter system capability.

Some of these technologies enable to operate in any PQ quadrant +P, +Q, -P and -Q

Wind energy systems however do not control the frequency of the AC system rather control the power flow and the voltage regulation using the newer converter technolgoies

__________________
Dr.Raghunatha Ramaswamy - We discover nothing new other than knowledge
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2007
Location: NYC metropolitan area.
Posts: 3230
Good Answers: 444
#7

Re: Difference Between Grid Connected and Standalone Wind Energy Conversion Systems

09/07/2011 12:15 AM

Thanks! Not quite sure why your response to my post was flagged as OT since it seems like a reasonable follow-on question so here goes.

A Permanent Magnetic Generator (PMG),or any alternator operating at a fixed field current (excitation level) at its design speed has a fixed no-load open circuit voltage. My earlier discussion about which way the VARs flow still holds, except now you have no control at all, it is the difference between the terminal voltage and the system voltage that rules.

Be careful about the terminology, Power Angle refers to the relationship between two phasors of like kind (either voltage or current), while Power Factor refers to the relationship between the two. We adjust the Power Angle by varying the amount of fuel (real work) that goes into the prime mover, while the Power Factor varies by the difference in the amount of EMF supplied by your source and the grid. Real power (Watts) and Reactive power (VARs) are at right angles (quadrature) to each other so theoretically they are independent of each other; i.e., changing one should have no effect on the other. In the real world of real machines in real systems there is some interaction mainly due to the non-linearity (saturation) of magnetic materials, it increases as the physical limits of the designs are reached or exceeded..

__________________
“Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.” Ben Franklin.
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Register to Reply 7 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

aditya1 (2); raghunath7 (2); RAMConsult (2); Tornado (1)

Previous in Forum: CT Ratio in Hydropower Plant   Next in Forum: Why is the Copper Wire in a Carbon Brush Connec....

Advertisement