Previous in Forum: Chimney For Wood Stove   Next in Forum: Google's Homage to Dickens's Bicentennial
Close
Close
Close
16 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Power-User

Join Date: May 2008
Location: Malanda, Australia
Posts: 117
Good Answers: 1

Battery Discharge Rates Versus Capacity (C10/C100 etc)

02/06/2012 11:09 PM

The rate at which batteries are discharged affects their available capacity, - particularly Lead Acid batteries, - typical sizing is C100, (1% per hour) C20 (many car batteries) C10 ,(10% per hour, - stand-alone power supplies) - has anyone seen some good articles on this phenomena? or even better some objective research? Cheers, Geoff Thomas.

__________________
Let's try and think clearly when looking at information and only allow emotions when weighing up options.
Register to Reply
Pathfinder Tags: Battery Discharge Rates
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#1

Re: Battery Discharge rates versus capacity (C10/C100 etc)

02/06/2012 11:49 PM
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: May 2008
Location: Malanda, Australia
Posts: 117
Good Answers: 1
#3
In reply to #1

Re: Battery Discharge rates versus capacity (C10/C100 etc)

02/07/2012 5:47 PM

Thanks for that link Lyn, lotsa info there but mainly Lithium batteries, - which of course have their (fast growing) place, yet still vastly out numbered by the lead acid battery. So in their info I couldn't find an article on the difference in capacity due to faster or slower discharge rates, and it may well only apply to lead acid batteries. Regards, Geoff.

__________________
Let's try and think clearly when looking at information and only allow emotions when weighing up options.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Battery Discharge rates versus capacity (C10/C100 etc)

02/07/2012 6:11 PM

Geoff,Sorry about that.

It seems pretty straight forward to me. Kinda like a compressed air tank. The Bigger the tank the more air you have. The higher the outflow rate, the sooner you run out of air.

This is from :

Capacity and Battery Ratings - Engineers Edge

Cheers.

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: May 2008
Location: Malanda, Australia
Posts: 117
Good Answers: 1
#5
In reply to #4

Re: Battery Discharge rates versus capacity (C10/C100 etc)

02/07/2012 6:56 PM

Hi Lyn, yes you would think so, but it is not the case, the slower you discharge the batteries the more total power you will get, - as your link article says, "Manufacturer's literature on batteries will normally specify several discharge rates (in amperes) along with the associated discharge time (in hours)." - Hence we specify the size of the battery at a certain discharge rate, and many battery retailers use the 100 hour rate, ie C100, which is discharging 1% of that capacity and should do that for 100 hours. If, however, you use that same battery, - say in a home power situation, where most of your power is consumed from dusk till 9PM, folk often don't realise they are discharging at perhaps the 10 hour rate (C10) per hour for that time, and say with a thick plate Telstra type battery, that same battery rated at the 10 hour rate is approximately 65% of the rating at the 100 hour rate. - This leads to many irate customers who think they are being ripped off, - and they are if the different discharge rates were not made clear to them. - I am hoping for some in depth research material on this phenomena if possible, - Geoff.

__________________
Let's try and think clearly when looking at information and only allow emotions when weighing up options.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#6
In reply to #5

Re: Battery Discharge rates versus capacity (C10/C100 etc)

02/07/2012 7:40 PM

Geoff,

I'm going to be no real help to you. I'm sure the research is there, if you can find it.

Some of the really smart guys here may know something, but it's over my head.

Good luck!

Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member United States - Member - New Member

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Wichita, Kansas USA
Posts: 653
Good Answers: 30
#2

Re: Battery Discharge Rates Versus Capacity (C10/C100 etc)

02/07/2012 10:48 AM

Cadex, a manufacturer of battery analyzing/charging equipment, has a pretty good "school" on batteries. I've used them as a good source of battery information a number of times:

Battery University

Lots of good info there. No affiliation, just a user of information.

Tom D.

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 476
Good Answers: 32
#7

Re: Battery Discharge Rates Versus Capacity (C10/C100 etc)

02/07/2012 10:27 PM

Lead Acid battery capacity vs current draw is pretty much summed up by Peukert's law.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peukert%27s_law

__________________
johny451
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Power-User

Join Date: May 2008
Location: Malanda, Australia
Posts: 117
Good Answers: 1
#10
In reply to #7

Re: Battery Discharge Rates Versus Capacity (C10/C100 etc)

02/09/2012 7:44 AM

Hi Johnny, I think that is a helpful answer for some who have come into this discussion, - however, for me it is a further description of the symptoms, not the problem, - I sell Inverters and Regulators that use Peukert's Law in their data collection of input and output, but where the information is scarce is on Why Lead Acid batteries behave this way, (and maybe other batteries do also) - why do Tubular batteries have less difference between eg. 10 hour and 100 hour rate of discharge, than Plante (Telecom style) batteries? - what actually happens in the chemical reaction to make it less efficient whilst discharging more, - indeed one wonders does that lead to why does lead itself only suffer approx. 1500 to 1800 total discharges before weakening (how can a chemical reaction weaken?) and how come by simply melting it and making new battery plates out of it the process can begin again? - born again, as it were? This all started from my commissioning a sophisticated MPPT battery charger, - which claimed to use Peukert, - and asking the supplier what discharge rate should I set the ampere hour of the battery at, (they require the battery capacity be entered) - 100 hour rate? 10 hour rate? if it doesn't matter why bother? - With the language difficulty with Taiwonese and English, (I have heard that a Chinese person, to learn English, must be turned inside out) of course the agent doesn't even understand the question, so maybe time to admit the Emperor has no clothes and to get to why this phenomena exists! I know it exists, battery manufacturers know it exists, (although their tables seem mainly based on measuring, - perhaps with a bit of Peukert help?) but why? - Lead acid batteries have been around a hundred years of so I believe, how can we possibly not know such a basic thing? Hopefully someone out there might know. Cheers, Geoff Thomas.

__________________
Let's try and think clearly when looking at information and only allow emotions when weighing up options.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: May 2010
Location: in optimism
Posts: 4050
Good Answers: 130
#15
In reply to #10

Re: Battery Discharge Rates Versus Capacity (C10/C100 etc)

02/09/2012 4:39 PM

I'm not sure many grasp what you are seeking, but I remember in Clayton and Shelly "Basic Electrical Engineering" [or similar title, circa 1900], having a paragraph or two on this.

I inherited my fathers copy, which unfortunately is not at hand at this juncture, but I'm fairly sure it was relevant to the solid lead plate art and with the invention of sintered plates became largely irrelevant - provided you stayed within the curves folk keep directing you to.

As to why they degrade, the reactions are not 'pure', the physicality generally asymmetric, so each cycle produces a small amount of lead sulphate where the current density is lowest. Better "current symmetry" is why wound cells tend to last longer.

If the charger does not contain the circuitry to largely dislodge this sulphate coating then it further creeps over more area. Meaning the manufactures cycle number curve is what you can best expect.

__________________
There is no sin except stupidity. (Oscar Wilde, Irish dramatist, novelist, & poet (1854 - 1900))
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Phnom Penh
Posts: 4019
Good Answers: 102
#8

Re: Battery Discharge Rates Versus Capacity (C10/C100 etc)

02/08/2012 4:25 AM

Geoff, C2 (2 hrs or 50%) is the specified discharge rate for telecoms applications (contrary to what it suggests at the end of this.)

The C8, C10, C20 caper is well explained there.

__________________
Difficulty is not an obstacle it is merely an attribute.
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: May 2008
Location: Malanda, Australia
Posts: 117
Good Answers: 1
#11
In reply to #8

Re: Battery Discharge Rates Versus Capacity (C10/C100 etc)

02/09/2012 7:52 AM

Hi Wal, that link didn't work, but ta anyway, - although telecom batteries are very rarely cycled, - usually, - only when the power fails, at least in Australia, then they have to carry the exchange through the longest recorded reasonable break in power supply. ( - well that used to be the case, maybe now not considered economic, - sort of what happened with "the mail must get through" - values change). G

__________________
Let's try and think clearly when looking at information and only allow emotions when weighing up options.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Phnom Penh
Posts: 4019
Good Answers: 102
#12
In reply to #11

Re: Battery Discharge Rates Versus Capacity (C10/C100 etc)

02/09/2012 9:00 AM
__________________
Difficulty is not an obstacle it is merely an attribute.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Phnom Penh
Posts: 4019
Good Answers: 102
#13
In reply to #12

Re: Battery Discharge Rates Versus Capacity (C10/C100 etc)

02/09/2012 9:02 AM

I know, the same as Lyn's link... I'm sure there's a smiley for that.

__________________
Difficulty is not an obstacle it is merely an attribute.
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#14
In reply to #13

Re: Battery Discharge Rates Versus Capacity (C10/C100 etc)

02/09/2012 10:58 AM

Just kidding.

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Power-User

Join Date: May 2008
Location: Malanda, Australia
Posts: 117
Good Answers: 1
#16
In reply to #12

Re: Battery Discharge Rates Versus Capacity (C10/C100 etc)

02/09/2012 6:00 PM

Thanks for the link Wal, I can see they claim telecom batts to be C10, but they would certainly not be my choice for such a hard work situation. The old telecom batts out of telephone exchanges used to have both their 10 hour and 100 hour rating stated, (very big difference) usually they were 500a/h@ C100, famed for not being able to start a car, although I never met anyone who tried with a brand new set. Cheers, Geoff.

__________________
Let's try and think clearly when looking at information and only allow emotions when weighing up options.
Register to Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Safety - ESD - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Near Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 50.390866N, 8.884827E
Posts: 17996
Good Answers: 200
#9

Re: Battery Discharge Rates Versus Capacity (C10/C100 etc)

02/08/2012 5:08 AM

Its not part of your interest as of this blog, but have you also looked at the charging rates and their effect on LA battery life?

Basically, if you charge to 100% capacity, you not only reduce battery life, but you also cause gassing on ventilated LA batteries, which needs careful consideration to stop batteries exploding if a spark occurs (special clothing, special procedures, charge efficiency and air replacement).

Overcharging makes the possible problems even worse.......

If you dimension a battery so that say your needs are fully covered by only 70% of its capacity and you only charge to that level (approx 13.4 volts max - read manufacturers literature), you will as good as never gas the battery and it will last far far longer.....as it is simply working less hard. In fact efficiency improves dramatically (ration of input charge to capacity) to as there is far less wasted charge energy as heat for example.......one should consider that charging above 70% costs real energy.....

The speed at which the charge is made, even if only to 70% also has an effect on efficiency too. The manufacturer is usually the best source of good infos in this area.....but generally, slower is better, though this may not be something that you can change much.

If heavy charging is a requirement, then make sure the charger monitors battery temperature as well......I have seen batteries boil when this is forgotten!! Not good.

Some of this information may also apply to other battery chemistries, but I was writing only for LA batteries.

Marking as Off Topic as it was not answering the questions of the OP....

__________________
"What others say about you reveals more about them, than it does you." Anon.
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Register to Reply 16 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

34point5 (1); Andy Germany (1); Johny451 (1); Lookfar (5); lyn (4); tdesmit (1); Wal (3)

Previous in Forum: Chimney For Wood Stove   Next in Forum: Google's Homage to Dickens's Bicentennial

Advertisement