Previous in Forum: Induction Motor Modelling and Simulation   Next in Forum: Line Reactors for Harmonics Reduction
Close
Close
Close
20 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Associate

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 39
Good Answers: 1

Panel Fault Level

06/27/2012 8:17 AM

we are designing a 415 V, 3 phase, 50 Hz panel (say, Panel-1) with 1 incomer and few outgoings. The incomer ACB is 3200 A, 65 kA. Is it necessary to have the same fault level (65kA) for outgoing MCCBs or can it be less.

One of the outgoings (say, Feeder-1) of Panel-1 is connected to Panel-2, with MCCB as incomer. This incomer of panel-2 (as per our calculations) is at 45kA. Panel-1 to Panel-2 is Cable connection.

So can we have Feeder -1 at 45 kA instead of 65 kA ? Kindly clarify.

prashanth

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: California, USA, where the Godless live next door to God.
Posts: 4665
Good Answers: 804
#1

Re: Panel Fault level

06/27/2012 9:10 AM

Fault bracing / interrupting capacities for electrical equipment are based on the levels at the incoming line terminals of that equipment. If you have already certified that it is 45kA, it is 45kA.

__________________
** All I every really wanted to be, was... A LUMBERJACK!.**
Register to Reply
Associate

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 39
Good Answers: 1
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Panel Fault level

06/27/2012 9:21 AM

Thanks for the reply. The Panel-1 incomer will be at 65kA. can the outgoing feeder (Feeder-1) be at 45 kA?

Prashanth

Register to Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Panel Fault level

06/27/2012 9:54 AM

Read #1↑ again.

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: California, USA, where the Godless live next door to God.
Posts: 4665
Good Answers: 804
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Panel Fault level

06/27/2012 11:34 AM

... and repeat until understood.

__________________
** All I every really wanted to be, was... A LUMBERJACK!.**
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 286
Good Answers: 15
#5

Re: Panel Fault Level

06/27/2012 12:24 PM

You are doing stage 2 before stage 1.

Find out what the PSCC is. This is the current that could be delivered to your panel from your transformer. A 1MVA transformer is usually around 30kA. This will have dropped a little by the time you get to the panel.

Your MCCBs, ACBs or whatever you select must be able to withstand this current. If the board is a fault rated board then you will need to ensure the busbars are rated above your potential fault current.

There all sorts of things you need to consider from arc flash, discrimination, protection settings together with the need to employ a reputable panel builder.

The power you are dealing with, about 2.5MVA, is large enough to cause a serious explosion. You need professional help.

Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru
United States - Member - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1604
Good Answers: 63
#6

Re: Panel Fault Level

06/27/2012 1:06 PM

Quote "Thanks for the reply. The Panel-1 incomer will be at 65kA. can the outgoing feeder (Feeder-1) be at 45 kA?"

Prashanth

If the fault current at panel 1 is 65 KA, then every thing in the panel must be rated at 65 KA. The fault at the breaker for feeder 1 is 65 KA so it must be rated at 65 KA. Now the fault current at panel 2 will be less so you may have a different rating at that point.

Register to Reply
Associate

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 39
Good Answers: 1
#13
In reply to #6

Re: Panel Fault Level

06/28/2012 2:22 AM

Thanks Sir. Good reply.

Prashanth

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: chennai,India
Posts: 592
Good Answers: 19
#7

Re: Panel Fault Level

06/27/2012 10:51 PM

In this case all devices in panel 1 to be rated for 65 kA and in panel 2 all devices to be rated for 45 kA. Please understand if the fault occurs at the outgoing terminal of the outgoing Mccb/ ACB,the fault current will be almost same with that at the incoming of the panel. Therefore , for any panel the incoming and outgoing devices like ACB / MCCB should have the same short circuit rating

__________________
Ramesh,Freelance Electrical/automation Consultant
Register to Reply
Associate

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 39
Good Answers: 1
#14
In reply to #7

Re: Panel Fault Level

06/28/2012 2:22 AM

Thanks Sir. Good reply. My doubt is clarified

Prashanth

Register to Reply
Associate

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 47
#17
In reply to #7

Re: Panel Fault Level

06/28/2012 4:16 AM

yes correct

Register to Reply
Participant

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Syria - Aleppo city
Posts: 4
#8

Re: Panel Fault Level

06/27/2012 10:52 PM

If The incomer ACB is 3200 A and the outgoings MCCBs linked with the same Bus bar in same enclosure it must be in a same short circuit capacity values.

Eng.Ihsan

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: srilanka
Posts: 2725
Good Answers: 5
#9

Re: Panel Fault Level

06/27/2012 10:57 PM

Fault levels at various points in the distribution system should be calculated for various kinds of faults and loads taking into account the fault level at the point of connection. Motors too would contribute. Finally coordination of protective devices,settings of OC/SC/EF relays too should be studied.

__________________
pnaban
Register to Reply
Associate

Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 28
Good Answers: 4
#10

Re: Panel Fault Level

06/27/2012 11:45 PM

"with 1 incomer and few outgoings"

"The incomer ACB is 3200 A, 65 kA"

"One of the outgoings (say, Feeder-1) of Panel-1 is connected to Panel-2, with MCCB as incomer. This incomer of panel-2 (as per our calculations) is at 45kA."

"So can we have Feeder -1 at 45 kA instead of 65 kA ?"

What is the kA of the "few outgoings"? Add the 45kA and the kA of the other "few outgoings". That will tell you what you need for "Feeder 1"

Simple addition. What's the problem?

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: chennai,India
Posts: 592
Good Answers: 19
#11
In reply to #10

Re: Panel Fault Level

06/27/2012 11:53 PM

I do not understand as to what you are trying to inform others , but your suggestion is misleading.

__________________
Ramesh,Freelance Electrical/automation Consultant
Register to Reply
Associate

Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 28
Good Answers: 4
#12
In reply to #11

Re: Panel Fault Level

06/28/2012 1:09 AM

"but your suggestion is misleading."

How is it misleading?

Feeder 1 is rated for 65kA. It feeds Panel 2 with 45kA PLUS other "few outgoings". The OP is asking if they can have Feeder 1 at 45kA. The answer is Feeder 1 needs to be at 45kA PLUS the other "few outgoings". What is the difficulty in understanding that?

Register to Reply
Associate

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 48
Good Answers: 1
#15
In reply to #12

Re: Panel Fault Level

06/28/2012 3:25 AM

It's misleading, you don't add up fault levels. As said before fault levels are based on calculations of source and system configurations In answer to the OP. ACB's are generally not current limiting, so the 65kA at the incomer will also be seen at all the feeders. Hence the need for fully rated devices. If you had a current limiting device as the incomer, then you could technically have used reduced ratings on the feeders, based on the let through data. But as a note, if you are in an IEC country, then you should be working to IEC61439-2 and it requires your assembly to have design verification carried out, followed by routine verification on the production assemblies Which standard are you working to?

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 286
Good Answers: 15
#18
In reply to #12

Re: Panel Fault Level

06/28/2012 4:28 AM

this suggestion is well mixed up. The 65kA is the maximum fault current occuring from a short circuit. There is nothing to add to this. This is all of the energy from the secondary of that transformer coming together.

Although the fault will drop slightly through the board/MCC we are looking at the impedance caused by the busbars. Its virtually nothing so a fault at the bars will still be in the order of 60 to 65kA. This is a big fault.

Every component that might see this fault such as one of the outgoing MCCBs must be rated to this figure. You might get a dead short on the outgoing side of the MCCB feeder.

If panel 2 is some distance away and a length of cable is required the circuit impedance will have increased and the current will drop. It is possible it will have dropped to 45kA by panel 2. Panel 2 could then be less onerous than panel 1.

Calcs still required to prove all of this though.

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 286
Good Answers: 15
#16

Re: Panel Fault Level

06/28/2012 3:26 AM

You really need to do the fault study to find out what values to use. If the incoming breaker will see 65kA on a bolted fault across the busbars then is must be rated to at least 65kA.

A panel of this type would need to be fault rated and that applies to the bus bars and the way they are braced together with all outgoing circuits.

If you use one of the outgoing ways of the panel to feed a second panel through a length of cable the fault level will have dropped at the second panel. Lets say the incomer to the second panel is 20m away then its likely that incomer could be rated lower at 45kA.

These are just words though - you need to determine the fault current at the different parts of the installation and ensure your equipment is rated at least equal to it.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: May 2010
Location: Liverpool, NY
Posts: 961
Good Answers: 131
#19
In reply to #16

Re: Panel Fault Level

06/28/2012 8:22 AM

I agree with silverfox. All the discussion has been based on the interrupt ratings of the breakers that the OP described (65kA and 45kA). However, no information on actual fault levels was provided! Until a fault study is done, the breakers may be overrated or overdutied. The breakers were probably specified based on "rules of thumb" and the kVA and % impedance of the supply transformer (if at all).

__________________
To get the right answers, first you need to ask the right questions.
Register to Reply
Commentator
France - Member - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Grenoble, France
Posts: 76
Good Answers: 4
#20

Re: Panel Fault Level

06/29/2012 3:59 AM

On short circuit calculation, and on discrimination / coordination / cascading between LV circuit breakers, you will find many reference documents on

http://www2.schneider-electric.com/sites/corporate/en/customers/designers/designers.page

http://www.electrical-installation.org/enwiki/3-phase_short-circuit_current_(Isc)_at_any_point_within_a_LV_installation

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 20 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

3PhaseDesign-Craig (1); CPWhittingham (2); Eng.Ihsan (1); JRaef (2); obouill (1); PeterT (1); pnaban (1); prashanthng (3); PWSlack (1); ramvinod (2); silverfox (3); sridharganasen (1); wareagle (1)

Previous in Forum: Induction Motor Modelling and Simulation   Next in Forum: Line Reactors for Harmonics Reduction

Advertisement