Previous in Forum: Maximum Allowable Deflection Rolls   Next in Forum: Welding Question
Close
Close
Close
27 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Member

Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 6

Actual External Pressure When Subjected to Vacuum

10/03/2012 1:46 PM

I'm trying to get a grasp on the real force 29 in Hg of vacuum exerts on a pressure or vacuum vessel.

29 inches of vacuum equals 14.2psi but I doubt applying that little pressure on the exterior walls of a vessel is enough to cause it to collapse, so there must be more to it.

Thanks for explaining.

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
5
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United Kingdom - Member - New Member

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harlow England
Posts: 16512
Good Answers: 670
#1

Re: Actual External Pressure When Subjected to Vacuum

10/03/2012 2:33 PM

You seem intent on ignoring the facts which you have already stated.
There isn't any more to it!
An example:-
In my workshop I have a dust extractor which sucks through a 4" diameter plasic concertia hose (thin wall hose reinforced by an open spiral of steel wire) connected to my bandsaw which is on wheels.
I connected the extractor to my new belt sander which had stupidly small holes to extract the dust.
The partial vacuum created in the hose cause it to try to collapse and in doing so dragged the extractor and bandsaw across the floor.
A quick order of magnitude calculation shows why.
Cross sectional area of hose, approx 2x2xpi sq inches. Lets call that 12
multiply by atmospheric pressure say 15 psi, that gives 180 pounds!
No wonder it dragged the bandsaw.

To overcome the problem I opened out the holes in the belt sander connector, that helped, but I still had to add some bleed holes to let extra air in to stop the hose collapsing.
There is no such thing as a vacuum... it's the atmospheric pressure that does the work (or hydrostaic pressure if you are underwater).
The early steam engines worked by filling a cylinder with steam and then condensing it causing a partial vacuum, allowing atmospheric pressure to move the large diameter piston. These machines lifted great volumes of water from mines and such like.

I agree it is counterintuitive.
I work for a company which sells pumps and often have trouble explaing to people that you can pump at several bar of pressure with no problem, but you can only 'suck' at 1 bar !

If you really wish to persist, ask yourself what is the pressure on an evacuated tin can of surface area 10 square inches, when it's..
a) in outer space.
b) on the surface of the Earth.
c) Under 120foot of water.
Do you expect it to be the same or different?
Del
<brevquot exception error process terminated>

__________________
health warning: These posts may contain traces of nut.
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 5)
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Old New Member

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South east U.K.
Posts: 3695
Good Answers: 93
#18
In reply to #1

Re: Actual External Pressure When Subjected to Vacuum

10/04/2012 4:36 AM

"I work for a company which sells pumps and often have trouble explaining to people that you can pump at several bar of pressure with no problem, but you can only 'suck' at 1 bar"

I have this problem explaining vacuum to people. We use pumps to extract all of the air from a vacuum chamber then use cryo pumps to remove the remaining molecules. People often ask how much the vacuum increases when we do this & have trouble understanding that 1 atmosphere is all you get.

__________________
I didn't have a really important life, but at least it's been funny (Lemmy Kilminster 1945-2015)
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: About 4000 miles from the center of the earth (+/-100 mi)
Posts: 9910
Good Answers: 1141
#21
In reply to #18

Re: Actual External Pressure When Subjected to Vacuum

10/04/2012 1:54 PM

And soda straws don't work well on the moon!

Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - CNC - New Member Hobbies - DIY Welding - New Member Engineering Fields - Electromechanical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 23647
Good Answers: 420
#22
In reply to #21

Re: Actual External Pressure When Subjected to Vacuum

10/04/2012 4:58 PM

neither does a compass.........

__________________
“ When people get what they want, they are often surprised when they get what they deserve " - James Wood
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#23
In reply to #21

Re: Actual External Pressure When Subjected to Vacuum

10/04/2012 5:03 PM

You can collapse a straw by blocking one end sucking on it.

You can't blow it up, no matter how hard you blow.

Register to Reply
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#24
In reply to #23

Re: Actual External Pressure When Subjected to Vacuum

10/04/2012 9:21 PM

In addition to the difference between internal and external pressure, a normal person can suck about 5 psid, but blow only about 2 psid.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Old New Member

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South east U.K.
Posts: 3695
Good Answers: 93
#25
In reply to #23

Re: Actual External Pressure When Subjected to Vacuum

10/05/2012 4:33 AM

"You can't blow it up"

Oh yeah?, I have access to some good explosives.

__________________
I didn't have a really important life, but at least it's been funny (Lemmy Kilminster 1945-2015)
Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United Kingdom - Member - New Member

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harlow England
Posts: 16512
Good Answers: 670
#26
In reply to #25

Re: Actual External Pressure When Subjected to Vacuum

10/05/2012 5:16 AM

Oh dear, yes, we're approaching that time of year.
Duck and cover for us Cats
Del
(mmmm Duck.....)

__________________
health warning: These posts may contain traces of nut.
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Old New Member

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South east U.K.
Posts: 3695
Good Answers: 93
#27
In reply to #26

Re: Actual External Pressure When Subjected to Vacuum

10/06/2012 6:16 PM

"That time of year" started a couple of weeks ago in this part of the country & will carry on all the way through November. Our own main event is next Saturday.

__________________
I didn't have a really important life, but at least it's been funny (Lemmy Kilminster 1945-2015)
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
Hobbies - CNC - New Member Hobbies - DIY Welding - New Member Engineering Fields - Electromechanical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 23647
Good Answers: 420
#2

Re: Actual External Pressure When Subjected to Vacuum

10/03/2012 2:36 PM

29 inches of vacuum equals 14.2psi but I doubt applying that little pressure on the exterior walls of a vessel is enough to cause it to collapse, so there must be more to it.

You just did you first mistake.

Remember that surface area, how many sq/in * 14.2.

The strength of a vessel is its tensional strength. Look at a thin wall aluminium soda can.

__________________
“ When people get what they want, they are often surprised when they get what they deserve " - James Wood
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Glen Mills, PA.
Posts: 2385
Good Answers: 114
#3

Re: Actual External Pressure When Subjected to Vacuum

10/03/2012 2:37 PM

Pressure alone does not describe the problem. Shape, size and material composition and thickness are other necessary considerations.

__________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 6
#4

Re: Actual External Pressure When Subjected to Vacuum

10/03/2012 3:07 PM

So, let's say I connect a 2" pipe to the vessel vented to atmospheric pressure and place the vessel inside a larger sealed container with just the 2" pipe sticking out and pressurize the container to 14.2psi, would the force created be enough to collapse the internal vessel?

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#5
In reply to #4

Re: Actual External Pressure When Subjected to Vacuum

10/03/2012 3:25 PM

The force created inside the sealed container would equal the force inside the vessel.

Zero differential pressure. No collapse.

Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 6
#6

Re: Actual External Pressure When Subjected to Vacuum

10/03/2012 3:52 PM

I meant 14.2 above atmospheric. The interior of the vessel would be at atmospheric pressure, the container and outside walls of the vessel at 14.2 above atmospheric pressure.

Just want to have an idea on how much force is created by full vacuum as 14 psi seems very little.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#7
In reply to #6

Re: Actual External Pressure When Subjected to Vacuum

10/03/2012 4:00 PM

Atmospheric pressure is the pressure created at sea level by a 1 square inch column of air that extends into space, pushing down on the surface of any object at sea level.

Is the pressure inside the sealed vessel absolute, or gauge pressure?

If I understand the question you would,in effect, have the equivalent of asmospheric pressure on the outside of the vented vessel, inside the sealed vessel.

Don't overthink this.

Register to Reply
2
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United Kingdom - Member - New Member

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harlow England
Posts: 16512
Good Answers: 670
#11
In reply to #6

Re: Actual External Pressure When Subjected to Vacuum

10/03/2012 5:36 PM

You are just going into a meltdown of overthink.
It doesn't matter how much you pump and pump and vaccum is only going to give you 14.7 psi and YES that's plenty to crush a can.

It's easy to do the experiment.
Take a gallon can put a half a cup of water in the bottom without the lid on, heat the bottom until the water is boiling hard, switch off the heat and put the lid on. Run it under the cold tap to condense the steam and watch it collapse.
You can do a simpler test with a 5L plastic bottle. Run some hot water into it and shake it to heat up the air inside, put the cap on and run it under the cold tap, the hot air/watervapour mix will condense and the bottle will collapse.

Ha! I think I've stumbled on the answer!
I think that's the fundamental problem, you have no idea what 14.7lb feels like!
Do you know what a 2lb club hammer feels like?
Well it's 7 times heavier than that.

If you still don't believe us make up a 14.7 lb weight and lift it with one finger, you'll find it's actually quite heavy.

Del

__________________
health warning: These posts may contain traces of nut.
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 182
Good Answers: 9
#15
In reply to #11

Re: Actual External Pressure When Subjected to Vacuum

10/04/2012 12:13 AM

Gee Del, you explained this so well that EVEN I understood it. G.A.

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
Hobbies - Musician - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 523
Good Answers: 17
#20
In reply to #11

Re: Actual External Pressure When Subjected to Vacuum

10/04/2012 11:15 AM

I like these practical examples. Now I have another in-the-kitchen science experiment to show my grandkids and see if we can understand what we just saw!

Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 6
#8

Re: Actual External Pressure When Subjected to Vacuum

10/03/2012 4:24 PM

Easy: 14.2 psi differential pressure between outside and inside of vessel. But I think you already knew what I meant.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1296
Good Answers: 104
#9

Re: Actual External Pressure When Subjected to Vacuum

10/03/2012 4:36 PM

Here's a dramatic little video of a rail tank car collapsing:
http://www.pipingguide.net/2009/04/rail-tank-car-collapse.html
You can Google 'vacuum collapse' for more examples. (Ignore the quantum physics references.)

Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 6
#10

Re: Actual External Pressure When Subjected to Vacuum

10/03/2012 5:02 PM

I saw that video, that's why I'm surprised 14psi could cause an implosion of such magnitude.

Mexican user safety standard for pressure vessels just changed and there are no provisions for vacuum tanks other than they are considered a type of pressure vessel so I'm documenting myself as best I can before taking my case to the labor agency.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Glen Mills, PA.
Posts: 2385
Good Answers: 114
#12
In reply to #10

Re: Actual External Pressure When Subjected to Vacuum

10/03/2012 6:29 PM

A tank will handle a greater internal pressure than it will an internal vacuum. Under the vacuum, the wall can buckle under compression before the material yields, under pressure it is in tension and good until the material reaches the yield point.

Think of your pipe, now use it as a form for a pipe made from aluminum foil. The aluminum foil pipe will handle a reasonable internal pressure but next to zero vacuum.

Oops, I should have payed more attention to Del's previous post.

I had an encyclopedia that showed a man bent at the waist with a plank across his back and on the plank, an elephant. It said that the weight was the equal of the total atmospheric pressure over his back.

__________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 6
#13

Re: Actual External Pressure When Subjected to Vacuum

10/03/2012 8:10 PM

Thanks everybody for helping me picture the effects of vacuum. Just wanted to be sure of what I'm taklking about when I go to the gov. agency. I have a 15" and a 28" of vacuum tank and it is in fact a lot of pressure.

Mexican standard divides vessels into 3 categories depending on relief valve set pressure but has no specs for vacuum tanks.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#14
In reply to #13

Re: Actual External Pressure When Subjected to Vacuum

10/03/2012 8:16 PM

Good luck!

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Stoke-on-Trent, UK
Posts: 4496
Good Answers: 137
#19
In reply to #13

Re: Actual External Pressure When Subjected to Vacuum

10/04/2012 7:18 AM

It looks like you've got the message now, but from your original post, it seems you couldn't picture how a vessel would collapse under vacuum, when it could stand 1 barg internal pressure easily. It's because the walls can buckle under compressive stress (vacuum case), but not under tensile (pressure case). For a typical pressure vessel, design for full vacuum leads to a shell thickness good for perhaps 8 - 10 barg internal. It's not unusual to add reinforcing rigs, internal or external, to increase vacuum capability at lower shell thickness.

__________________
Give masochists a fair crack of the whip
Register to Reply
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#16

Re: Actual External Pressure When Subjected to Vacuum

10/04/2012 1:50 AM

14.7 psi ≈ 2119 psf. I think it then becomes more intuitive.
Also, in compression is like pushing a rope; it doesn't take much force to bend it.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#17

Re: Actual External Pressure When Subjected to Vacuum

10/04/2012 3:15 AM

OK now?

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 27 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

bigg (1); Codemaster (1); evaluator (1); lyn (4); Nigh (3); passingtongreen (2); phoenix911 (2); PWSlack (1); reward54 (1); Rhinoracer (5); Rixter (1); Tornado (2); user-deleted-1105 (3)

Previous in Forum: Maximum Allowable Deflection Rolls   Next in Forum: Welding Question

Advertisement