Previous in Forum: Fuji VFD Control Questions   Next in Forum: Electrical
Close
Close
Close
4 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Guru
Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - EE from the the Wilds of Pa.

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: middle of nowhere, Pennsylvania
Posts: 2603
Good Answers: 63

ET BS31 (??)

11/06/2012 1:36 PM

Got a spec written in Europe for an Asian project (in a former British colony) concerning wiring to junction boxes with cabling passing through cable glands. It requires 1/2" ET glands. I am familiar with BSPP/BSPT/PG but this is the first time I have run into ET.

Near as I can tell from a search, this is the standard British conduit thread. (??) All conversions charts I find start at 5/8" ET, so the 1/2" is a bit strange, but I know we have 3/8"NPT glands when conduit sizes stop at 1/2".

I assume this is like NPT and since I am going through the wall of a 10 gauge box with a drilled, not tapped, hole, it should not matter if I use NPT or ET. There is nothing "magical" about this thread concerning sealing - right?

__________________
Remember when reading my post: (-1)^½ m (2)^½
Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
United States - Member - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1604
Good Answers: 63
#1

Re: ET BS31 (??)

11/06/2012 3:14 PM

I would agree that it does not matter which you use. I assume you are installing a locking nut on both side of the drilled hole. You did not say conductor size but 3/8 does not give you much room for the conductor.

Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - EE from the the Wilds of Pa.

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: middle of nowhere, Pennsylvania
Posts: 2603
Good Answers: 63
#2
In reply to #1

Re: ET BS31 (??)

11/06/2012 3:28 PM

This is definitely an "over-kill" situation as each gland is just for a Foundation Fieldbus cable from a segment protector to an individual instrument within 6 meters of the junction box. The entire spec for this also adds "double compression type gland" which is good enough for explosive atmospheres, which this is most certainly not. OD will be under 3/8". They run in the 0.28 to 0.34" OD range. Spec fails to give desired model for the cable, so I am using a 0.334" OD cable in my quote.

So the ET is a "standard" British conduit thread? We have bought stainless conduit from England and it was available in NPT here.

__________________
Remember when reading my post: (-1)^½ m (2)^½
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Eastern Kansas USA
Posts: 1503
Good Answers: 128
#3

Re: ET BS31 (??)

11/09/2012 9:15 PM

Phys,

I have never worked with ET, but remember a time when I was working on a job in Jamaica and went into a wholesaler to ask for some conduit. When I asked for 1/2" they replied: "English Thread or US?" When I asked about the differences I was told that ET was outside diameter. Thus US's 1/2" NPT is approx. 7/8" outside diameter and ET would be 1/2" o.d. I suspect you will have some trouble if you are trying to put 1/2" ET into a box with a 7/8" hole.

--JMM

Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - EE from the the Wilds of Pa.

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: middle of nowhere, Pennsylvania
Posts: 2603
Good Answers: 63
#4
In reply to #3

Re: ET BS31 (??)

11/12/2012 8:14 AM

Not really as I am making the hole in the box. (electrical cabinet would be a closer description, except we are only providing a connection point for the instruments to the DCS, so the jb decription is appropriate)

That is an interesting deal with the 1/2" being the OD as that does make the ID a bit smaller than expected.

__________________
Remember when reading my post: (-1)^½ m (2)^½
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 4 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

jmueller (1); Phys (2); wareagle (1)

Previous in Forum: Fuji VFD Control Questions   Next in Forum: Electrical

Advertisement