Previous in Forum: Soil Safe Bearing Capacity   Next in Forum: Corrosion
Close
Close
Close
14 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Glen Mills, PA.
Posts: 2385
Good Answers: 114

NZ Quake Collapse Building Design 'Deficient'

12/10/2012 8:22 AM

NZ quake collapse building design 'deficient'

Unfortunately, as I see from the questions asked in another forum, this working of engineers beyond their competence is not that unusual, even in developed countries.

__________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - Been there, done that. Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 15600
Good Answers: 981
#1

Re: NZ Quake Collapse Building Design 'Deficient'

12/10/2012 10:22 AM

Sometimes the most significant thing in a news article is what is missing from the article. The article points out that the overseer of the engineer did not oversee and that the experience of the engineer did not include working in a zone prone to earthquakes. (Another overseer oversight.) The article mentions nothing about any possible repercussion for the overseer. They do not even mention the oversight firm nor governmental bureaucratic title responsible to inform the design engineer if the design met local codes.

__________________
"Don't disturb my circles." translation of Archimedes last words
Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Civil Engineering - Member

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: ''but, don't we get PAID to ask questions?...''
Posts: 1661
Good Answers: 17
#9
In reply to #1

Re: NZ Quake Collapse Building Design 'Deficient'

12/11/2012 11:59 PM

The overseer(s) in question sound like he/she/they were hire primarily (political) preferability, rather than their technical competence. Thus, they might not be the only ones who were negligent...

The main problem may be that the earthquake didn't wait 50 more years to hit...

Then, the (overseer(s)) would have passed away, and the politicians could blame said person(s) all they wanted to, just like with the I-95 bridge collapse in Minnesota, USA. There, the engineers were blamed instead of the (unidentified adminstrator(s)) that allowed the bridge to become, and remain, a storage area for construction materials, for months and months, without being held accountable...

The bridge did exceed it's 50 year design life (just barely) in spite of such administrative abuses...

__________________
''illigitimi non carborundum...''(i.e.: don't let the fatherless (self-deluding,sabotaging, long-term-memory-impaired, knee-jerking, cheap-shotting, mono-syllabic, self-annointed, shadow-lurking, back-biting, off-topic-inquisitors) grind you down...)
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru
Canada - Member - New Member Popular Science - Cosmology - New Member Hobbies - Musician - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Up North
Posts: 540
Good Answers: 30
#2

Re: NZ Quake Collapse Building Design 'Deficient'

12/10/2012 10:41 AM

An engineer designing to code cannot, I believe, be sued if the building falls down. That's incompetence and could only result in termination. An engineer refusing to refer to the relevent code would be considered negligent and WOULD be open to a lawsuit.

__________________
Steve of the North...since 1962.
Register to Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#3
In reply to #2

Re: NZ Quake Collapse Building Design 'Deficient'

12/10/2012 10:46 AM

In the UK, a civil defence would be two-fold:

  1. It is designed to code (British Standards, the Building Regulations, whatever)
  2. The design was approved by the Local Authority's Planning Office and inspected by them at appropriate intervals as work progressed with no improvement or prohibition notices being issued.
__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 668
Good Answers: 3
#4
In reply to #2

Re: NZ Quake Collapse Building Design 'Deficient'

12/10/2012 5:20 PM

i wonder how they sleep at night.

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia.
Posts: 126
Good Answers: 11
#6
In reply to #4

Re: NZ Quake Collapse Building Design 'Deficient'

12/10/2012 10:41 PM

Ignorance is bliss > have a blissful night's sleep.

Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Guru

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 668
Good Answers: 3
#11
In reply to #6

Re: NZ Quake Collapse Building Design 'Deficient'

12/13/2012 10:02 PM

i have'nt had a good nights sleep in decades. i've build some of the most incompenent designed buildings that a person could think of. it's all about money. i've walked away from more that a few.

CR4 ADMIN: Modified Post

Vulgar/Rude/Improper Behavior: This post was modified because it did not adhere to the behavioral policies of the site. Please review Section 14 of the CR4 Site FAQ and the CR4 Rules of Conduct.

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 668
Good Answers: 3
#12
In reply to #6

Re: NZ Quake Collapse Building Design 'Deficient'

12/13/2012 10:28 PM

i'm impressed with egotism.

denagrating someone is easy to do, especially when you don't respect other peoples back ground or thier comments. good bye

CR4 ADMIN: Modified Post

Abuse/Attack: This post was modified because it was an attack on another user. Please review the CR4 Site FAQ and the CR4 Rules of Conduct.nduct.

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Glen Mills, PA.
Posts: 2385
Good Answers: 114
#5
In reply to #2

Re: NZ Quake Collapse Building Design 'Deficient'

12/10/2012 9:51 PM

I have to disagree with this. The codes cover measurable strengths and weaknesses, they don't cover stupid. The calculated loads and strengths are developed from estimated behavior and assumed load paths which cannot be derived from any code. If the assumptions are correct the design should be good, but is the assumptions are wrong, the design could, while complying with the code, lead to disaster.

__________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 668
Good Answers: 3
#13
In reply to #5

Re: NZ Quake Collapse Building Design 'Deficient'

12/13/2012 10:50 PM

i agree to a point. saving money seems to be a big issue. money seems to over ride the costs involved with safety . i would like to see the engineering team have a say in critizing the design without the fear of being replaced by a "yes man"

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1753
Good Answers: 59
#7

Re: NZ Quake Collapse Building Design 'Deficient'

12/11/2012 12:56 AM

The Great California Earthquake was a huge and expensive learning event there. Repeated quakes on the west coast enhanced understanding and codes in steps and fits. A few years apprenticeship would have be useful for all involved from New Zealand. Too cheap, letting have them the education, but convenient to blame them? That is no solution.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 706
Good Answers: 32
#8

Re: NZ Quake Collapse Building Design 'Deficient'

12/11/2012 10:52 AM

What is significant is that New Zealand is situated on the Pacific Ring of Fire and basically has the Pacific plate pushing against the Australian plate. The islands probably have more extinct and no-so-extinct and just plain active volcanoes per square mile than any other place on earth. Supposedly New Zealand has some very stringent building codes that take into account the earthquake activity found there. How a lackadaisical approach by the construction manager or any designer/engineer/architect doesn't border on a criminal action seems strange.

__________________
Spinco
Register to Reply
Power-User
Australia - Member - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 136
Good Answers: 2
#10
In reply to #8

Re: NZ Quake Collapse Building Design 'Deficient'

12/13/2012 9:00 PM

Stories run recently on Australian television suggest that the 'engineer-in-charge' wasn't qualified. He is alleged to have stolen another engineers details etc., and used that person's civil engineering qualifications to gain employment which included supervising construction of the now collapsed [10 storey] building in Christchurch NZ.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 706
Good Answers: 32
#14
In reply to #10

Re: NZ Quake Collapse Building Design 'Deficient'

12/17/2012 10:17 AM

I'm assuming that the charges against him will involve more than just plain "identity theft". That's pretty much going to involve manslaughter charges along with false swearing on official documentation and a host of other charges besides.

__________________
Spinco
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 14 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

durtieduck (4); leveles (1); Malcolm Stephen (1); MR. Guest (1); passingtongreen (1); Phil D. (1); PWSlack (1); redfred (1); Spinco (2); Steve of the North (1)

Previous in Forum: Soil Safe Bearing Capacity   Next in Forum: Corrosion

Advertisement