Previous in Forum: Pipe Internal Pressure Calculating   Next in Forum: Fab Drawings for Stevenson Fog Bell Apparatus
Close

Comments Format:






Change Mode
Close

Subscribe to Discussion:

CR4 allows you to "subscribe" to a discussion
so that you can be notified of new comments to
the discussion via email.

Close

Rating Vote:







Add Vote
10 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
XALIX
Member

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 7

Indian Boiler Regulation (IBR) for CRYOGENIC Steam Heated Vaporisers

09/18/2013 11:30 AM

Dear Friends,

we have an atmospheric open water bath container (approx. 25 m³). We direct heat the waterbath with a simple 3" steam lance (pipe with mulitple 6 mm holes). Before the lance we have a control valve. The steam operating pressure is approx. 4.5 kg/cm²a while the design pressure is 8.1 kg/cm²g.

At the first step we assumed that IBR is applicable up to the control valve. However, in discussion it came up that, due to back pressure (if above 3.5 kg/cm² g) in the lance the whole atmopheric open water container including any down stream piping will fall under the rules of IBR. And addionally the cryogenic liquid coils.

I ask for recommendations how to fix the limits of IBR and if applicable how to design a atmopheric open equipment acc. to IBR.

Are there any ideas how to avoid IBR downstream the control valve?

Thanks for your reply.
Register to Reply
Pathfinder Tags: IBR Indian Boiler Regulation Vaporisers
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
bigg
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1296
Good Answers: 104
#1

Re: Indian Boiler Regulation (IBR) for CRYOGENIC Steam Heated Vaporisers

09/18/2013 12:43 PM

Reduce the back pressure in the lance? Possibly by reducing the flow rate. If I correctly deduce your system, the liquid coils probably still fall under some pressure code.
Register to Reply
XALIX
Member

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 7
#4
In reply to #1

Re: Indian Boiler Regulation (IBR) for CRYOGENIC Steam Heated Vaporisers

09/19/2013 2:20 AM

Liquid Coils will be acc. to ASME.
Register to Reply
Tornado
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#2

Re: Indian Boiler Regulation (IBR) for CRYOGENIC Steam Heated Vaporisers

09/18/2013 4:43 PM

You should be asking about downstream of the lance perforations.

__________________
 In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Mike W
Power-User

Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Posts: 147
Good Answers: 9
#3

Re: Indian Boiler Regulation (IBR) for CRYOGENIC Steam Heated Vaporisers

09/18/2013 5:16 PM

Larger/more holes in the lance?

__________________
 You have to actively participate in the manifestations of your own joys and good fortunes - they are not ready made for the taking, they are available for the making.
Register to Reply
XALIX
Member

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 7
#6
In reply to #3

Re: Indian Boiler Regulation (IBR) for CRYOGENIC Steam Heated Vaporisers

09/19/2013 2:28 AM

Change the number/size of holes will have negative effect to the performance.
Register to Reply
PWSlack
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#7
In reply to #6

Re: Indian Boiler Regulation (IBR) for CRYOGENIC Steam Heated Vaporisers

09/19/2013 9:33 AM

How?

__________________
 "Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply
XALIX
Member

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 7
#5

Re: Indian Boiler Regulation (IBR) for CRYOGENIC Steam Heated Vaporisers

09/19/2013 2:26 AM

The question is also, what will be limits of IBR if the back pressure under design conditons (8.1 kg/cm²g) can not be reduced below 3.5 kg/cm²g.

Is it only the lance, or is IBR required for the whole waterbath container and if very worst also for the coils for cryogenic liquid.

Thanks again.
Register to Reply
PWSlack
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#8

Re: Indian Boiler Regulation (IBR) for CRYOGENIC Steam Heated Vaporisers

09/19/2013 9:36 AM

The back-pressure in the lance is a function of the flowrate and the immersion depth. The delta-P at each nozzle is a function of flowrate and fluid properties; the immersion depth is insignificant.

As far as the Pressure Systems Regulations go in the UK, the lance, being formed of perforated pipe, would be exempt.

__________________
 "Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply
pritam
Guru
Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - New Member India - Member - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: City of destiny, INDIA
Posts: 775
Good Answers: 67
#9

Re: Indian Boiler Regulation (IBR) for CRYOGENIC Steam Heated Vaporisers

09/24/2013 10:22 AM

What it matters to use IBR piping, a few more metres in length in the downstream of control valve? It's a pity question.

And addionally the cryogenic liquid coils.

Cryogenic liquid coils never fall under IBR. It's generally made of seamless SS316/SS316L pipe.
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
No more "Almost" Good Answers.
XALIX
Member

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 7
#10
In reply to #9

Re: Indian Boiler Regulation (IBR) for CRYOGENIC Steam Heated Vaporisers

09/24/2013 11:06 AM

Dear Pritram, thanks for your needful reply.

The attached piping is not the problem. I have more doubts regarding the atmospheric open waterbath container with all the attachments.

Do you have an idea how this will be handled by IBR?
Register to Reply
Register to Reply
Have a Different Question?
10 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

bigg (1); Mike W (1); pritam (1); PWSlack (2); Tornado (1); XALIX (4)

Previous in Forum: Pipe Internal Pressure Calculating   Next in Forum: Fab Drawings for Stevenson Fog Bell Apparatus

Advertisement

Got Something to Say?
Ask a Question
Start a Discussion

Search this Forum
Mechanical Engineering:
Go

CR4 Sections
Aerospace
BioMech & BioMed
Chemical & Material Science
Civil Engineering
Communications & Electronics
Education and Engineering Careers
Electrical Engineering
General Discussion
Instrumentation
Manufacturing
Mechanical Engineering
New Technologies & Research
Software & Programming
Sustainable Engineering
Transportation

Site Directories
Forum Directory
Blog Directory
User Group Directory
RSS Feeds

CR4 Rules of Conduct
CR4 FAQ
Site Glossary

Who's Online (68 right now)
Show Members
Advertisement