Previous in Forum: Is It Money That Tops Engineering   Next in Forum: Fusion "Breakthrough" at NIF? Uh, Not Really …
Close
Close
Close
Page 2 of 2: « First < Prev 1 2 Last »
Rate Comments: Nested
Guru
Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Posts: 13529
Good Answers: 468

The Facts Are In... The Models Were Wrong

02/12/2014 9:34 AM
__________________
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Ben Franklin
Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#87
In reply to #85
Find in discussion

Re: The Facts Are In... The Models Were Wrong

02/16/2014 11:10 AM

Why worry about food crops? Didn't any of his handlers tell him crops grow better when it's warmer?

More crops, more crop growth, more co2 removed from the atmosphere. Oh wait, that's not what he wants us to hear.

Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Posts: 13529
Good Answers: 468
#88
In reply to #87

Re: The Facts Are In... The Models Were Wrong

02/16/2014 11:32 AM

Talk about something that is specifically written to induce panic.

Wow. You can smell his desperation.

__________________
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Ben Franklin
Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Posts: 13529
Good Answers: 468
#86
In reply to #84
Find in discussion

Re: The Facts Are In... The Models Were Wrong

02/16/2014 11:07 AM

Why is there no concern here, only with CO2, which will make people even wealthier through the carbon exchanges?

http://theartofmoney101.blogspot.com/2013/05/russia-warns-obama-monsanto.html

__________________
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Ben Franklin
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 859
Good Answers: 33
#108
In reply to #84
Find in discussion

Re: The Facts Are In... The Models Were Wrong

02/19/2014 1:31 AM

Lyn--Look at the ships stuck in Arctic Ice--It was the earliest in recorded History that the Northwest passage froze. Hundreds of ships were frozen into ice in northern China. The Antarctic Ice has risen at an unprecedented rate. But the ice on the other edge of the continent has been melting. Please, when talking about these factors, please give us : TIME, PLACE, FORM, and EVENT---Which part of the Arctic is melting? When was it melting? Which part is frozen? Same goes for the Antarctic.. You give us no time line. Al Gore didn't either...

Register to Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Evolution - New Member Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member

Join Date: May 2006
Location: The 'Space Coast', USA
Posts: 11119
Good Answers: 918
#110
In reply to #108

Re: The Facts Are In... The Models Were Wrong

02/19/2014 7:48 AM

If memory serves, the world is currently -.5% less ice than whatever normal is supposed to be.

Using that same normal, the Arctic is -5.5%, the Antarctic is +25.5%, and my freezer ice bucket is full.

Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Posts: 13529
Good Answers: 468
#111
In reply to #110

Re: The Facts Are In... The Models Were Wrong

02/19/2014 8:01 AM

How can you say that???!!!!

Back when things were normal, kids could frolic on the glaciers in central park.

http://www.landforms.eu/Central%20Park/Glacial%20striation.htm

__________________
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Ben Franklin
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: East Texas
Posts: 1439
Good Answers: 31
#98

Re: The Facts Are In... The Models Were Wrong

02/18/2014 2:37 PM

Is human activity changing atmospheric composition?

Is human activity changing planetary albedo?

A yes to either of these questions means we are impacting the temperature of the biosphere. Its a no brainer.

The only question that remains is to the scale of human influence.

It also seems reasonable to infer that any change in the rate of photosynthesis would not only impact CO2 concentrations but also O2 concentrations.

__________________
"The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark." -- Michelangelo
Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - Time to take control United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Systems Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tampa, Florida, USA
Posts: 2129
Good Answers: 87
#100
In reply to #98

Re: The Facts Are In... The Models Were Wrong

02/18/2014 2:44 PM

It also seems reasonable to infer that any change in the rate of photosynthesis would not only impact CO2 concentrations but also O2 concentrations.

Yes, it does seem reasonable. But that does not make it so.

__________________
J B
Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Posts: 13529
Good Answers: 468
#101
In reply to #98

Re: The Facts Are In... The Models Were Wrong

02/18/2014 2:57 PM

A yes to either of these questions means we are impacting the temperature of the biosphere. Its a no brainer.

What?

That's like saying that if we change the chemical composition of water, and make koolaid, (without doing anything else but dumping in the koolaid packet), we will change the temperature of the water.

What would the story be if we were here, and global temps were 10 - 14 degrees colder?

Sure there's more CO2 than if humans weren't here, but we have no clue what that means?

Ironically, the same hippies that say the earth is going to end from CO2, recommend a whopping 1300 ppm for grow rooms.

http://www.hydrofarm.com/resources/articles/co2_enrichment.php

__________________
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Ben Franklin
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: East Texas
Posts: 1439
Good Answers: 31
#104
In reply to #101

Re: The Facts Are In... The Models Were Wrong

02/18/2014 3:20 PM

"That's like saying that if we change the chemical composition of water, and make koolaid, (without doing anything else but dumping in the koolaid packet), we will change the temperature of the water."

Indeed we would be changing the thermodynamic and optical properties of the water by adding koolaid. Significantly. If the introduction of the Koolaid is solely as a suspension then the immediate change in temperature would simply be a function of the temperature and specific heat of the Koolaid mix. However; if once the mixture is exposed to a solar flux the Koolaid would in most likely hood effect both the rate of change in temperature due to the exposure of the solar flux as well as the equilibrium temperature.

"Sure there's more CO2 than if humans weren't here, but we have no clue what that means?" -

It's true; I don't have a clue as to that means - but the climate scientists say it changes atmospheric opacity to IR radiation. And that is the issue.

I'm just not ready to drink the Koolaid yet; I'm sure I'll get there eventually, providing I expose myself to enough of the B.S.

__________________
"The greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mark." -- Michelangelo
Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Posts: 13529
Good Answers: 468
#106
In reply to #104

Re: The Facts Are In... The Models Were Wrong

02/18/2014 4:24 PM

I said there's more CO2 due to humans, but honestly, I don't even know if that's true.

I was just sitting here imagining the unchallenged vegetative growth on a planet with no humans, along with the the dying off of the vegetation and drying that comes with natural seasons and droughts.

...and then I thought about the size and intensity of lightning sparked fires that would just spread and burn until they went out on their own, and I think there's a possibility that earth would see some amazing micro-variations, of both temperature and CO2 levels.

__________________
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Ben Franklin
Register to Reply
Register to Reply Page 2 of 2: « First < Prev 1 2 Last »

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Hero (11); Anonymous Poster (1); C-Mac (1); Epke (1); Gavilan (8); JBTardis (4); JNB (2); kramarat (38); lyn (15); NEL (1); ormondotvos (2); passingtongreen (1); phoenix911 (13); redfred (4); Rorschach (6); SolarEagle (1); Usbport (2)

Previous in Forum: Is It Money That Tops Engineering   Next in Forum: Fusion "Breakthrough" at NIF? Uh, Not Really …

Advertisement