5 Ridiculous Conspiracy Theories That Tried To Prove Aliens Exist

Hello Spacevudo,

that depends totally what you believe in. Evolution or Creation. Both are

RELIGIONS!!! ...but with one little distinctive, propagandistic agenda and difference!

Evolution claims boldly - that what they are doing / saying / proofing - it is SCIENCE!

The real Question is not answered yet ones and forever: "How we (humans) and the

surrounding cosmos came into existence"? But, if you believe in Creation, read the

BIBLE. There you will find a pretty good account, what happened here 6000 years

ago. That alone should answer your question and guide you in the right direction.

Therefore... I personally "BELIEVE", that extraterrestrial lifeforms and the

whole UFO / ALIEN agenda is propaganda and all stories are some kind of military /

government experiments impossible to hide from the public. If you believe in

>>>>>> circular reasoning patterns <<<<<<<

i.e. the geological column, then I would say Santa Claus is real and his sled

is pulled by some reindeer's, defying gravity . If you want to really know what is

going on in this world, you have to unlearn at first all propaganda teachings, what

was brought to you by our media, government, school teachers, churches, military,

banks and their plunder "us" system, politicians, NASA, FBI, CIA, ALEX JONES in the

Internet and all this other weirdos etc. etc. ! Unfortunately, we are the 99% and

ruled by 1%, but most powerful individuals. They are telling us all this nonsense what

is rat poison for your thinking aparatus, including some life existing somewhere in the

universe what does not help us at all to gain knowledge and wisdom to live our life's

consciously .

My dear friend, learn how to think, not what to think!

Hello Fredski, I don't know what you know and how much you know about what, and I am honestly not interested either.....but, please do your self a favor and read my comment again. You will find, that I am not demanding 100% proof of one theory. I just said and belief that Evolution is a Religion (Religion is based on Faith!) and I do not belief as former atheist in Evolution anymore. That does not constitute that my explanation is 100% solely based on faith. You have to "belief" all this pseudo scientific facts of "Evolution" in order to be fully convinced regarding their claims I do not want to go into, because, this forum is not the platform for exposing these facts, theories and beliefs and in my understanding they are off topic. The same is valid for Creation. Darwin is more and more looking like a "Fool", because it is meanwhile an established fact, that even he did not fully believe in his own writings anymore, plagued by doubt's...at the end of his lifetime. So, please let's not get decadent with word games. It's not worth it! Period. Cheers and regards, Okonopel

Your illiterate dishonesty will not sell well here.

okonope,

Read:

Elmer Gantry - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Darwin's doubts were not about the theory he was expounding but about whether he should risk himself and his family being ostrosized by publishing into a society that was so dominated by the religious thinking of the time. He feared that the reaction to his theory would prevoke the type of response that met Galeleo Galelae when he suggested that the earth was not the centre of the universe. Your response to his theory 155 years after it's publication suggests that he was correct to fear being ridiculed. With the increase of knowledge our perception of the world about us changes, even religions evolve. Your own creationist theory has evolved. You quoted a 6000 year lifespan for the world but this figure was first muted about 1974 by a Ken Ham who was born in 1951. Prior to 1974 Creationists put no figure on the age of the earth. Given that your own religion is evolving, why do you claim that other things cannot also evolve?

Hi Anonymous Hero,

How can it be, that an "Argument" is provably false?? An argument is used to establish dialog.

And how can it be false, if it just you who "thinks" that it is so??

Did you eventually confuse the two words "Argument" and "Statement"?? A statement is used to establish provable facts.....Ask a Lawyer, he may educate you.

Cheers and regards, Okonopel

"Both are RELIGIONS!!!"

That was your claim in your own words.

That means you have to substantiate that claim with a proof. That is the definition and rules for "argumentation".

So, I wasn't asking you to disprove anything, but to substantiate your claim with a proof and I only asked that you substantiate that evolution is a religion.

I think that we can both agree that Creationism is a religion (or at least part of), so no argument there.

As for proving an argument false all you need to do is demonstrate that the provided proof of the argument's claim is not true or a fallacy. However, that point is a bit of a red herring as I am only interested in your claim that both are religions.

if it quacks, waddles and hangs out with ducks it could be just trying to fit in or maybe it's something evolving....

"....ones and forever...."

My dear friend, learn how to spell.....

Stephen Hawkins said it all ( 2 decades ago) when he stated sending all of that data into outer space was a BIG mistake.

" Hey JO-E-6PAK, look at the dumb @$$ carbon creatures on these primitive drawings. I wonder how they would taste in a Centauri Sauce?" " I don't know OB241, get the tractor beam warmed up and we'll pick a few up on our way home tonight."

1. Yes, I believe in aliens.....
2. ..... and there was second gunman!
3. ...and the Loup Garou will be out again next full moon!
4. ....Lochness is long since dead but the Kraken ( Colossus squid) do exist.
5. .... Aliens did help build the Pyramids
6. ...... we can quit trying for Warp drive and concentrate more on Worm Holes
7. .....and I do believe in the Bible.

Just my opinion in the discussion.