Acoustics & Audio Technology Blog

Acoustics & Audio Technology

The Acoustics & Audio Technology Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about speakers and amplifiers, acoustic materials, signal measurement and processing and mobile & handheld devices as used in the audio industry. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: Internet Curves Ahead?   Next in Blog: Treacherous Texting on the Road
Close
Close
Close
7 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Hyping Active Noise Reduction

Posted May 09, 2010 8:08 AM by Sharkles

Spec- and marketing-wise, claims of 99% active noise reduction for headphones may be true, but not the ultimate performance metric for customers to compare competitive products. So says Dr. Paul Darlington, chief acoustic scientist at Phitek Systems Ltd. A better way may be to look at percentage reduction in loudness vs dB attenuation. What do you think?

The preceding article is a "sneak peek" from Acoustics & Audio Technology, a newsletter from GlobalSpec. To stay up-to-date and informed on industry trends, products, and technologies, subscribe to Acoustics & Audio Technology today.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
3
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#1

Re: Hyping Active Noise Reduction

05/09/2010 9:58 PM

Analysis of sound is an incredibly complex science. I know. I was director of engineering of a noise cancellation company that held a number of patents in the late "80s. We produced headsets and electronic mufflers for cars. (And one muffler for the M60 tank for the US Army)

Headset performance is completely subjective. Noise cancellation is too. Yes, you can characterize the sound and measure the reduction, but hearing, and ears are like fingerprints. They are ALL DIFFERENT. The marketing guys will always push the envelope.

Did you know that the Beech Starship uses $50,000.00USD of acoustic "barbells" attached to the inside of the fuselage to reduce blade pass noise transmitted from the props to the fuselage?

Marketers will be marketers.

Reply Good Answer (Score 3)
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Large hole formally occupied by furry woodland creature.
Posts: 3385
Good Answers: 97
#5
In reply to #1

Re: Hyping Active Noise Reduction

06/05/2010 1:52 PM

lynlynch,

Perhaps you could cast light on this (No Pun Intended).

In the mid 60's a friend and I happened to be cruising past a small local airport at night when we saw an intense searchlight beam scanning the ground from what appeared to be a helicopter (we could see the cockpit lights).

The strange thing was, there was no sound, not even the ambient noise from insects on a summer night, nothing.

Was this technology available back then?

__________________
CRTL-Z
Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#6
In reply to #5

Re: Hyping Active Noise Reduction

06/19/2010 10:50 AM

Not that I am aware of. But I was in high school in the mid 60's.

Electronics had not advanced to the point that you could process information fast enough to produce the canceling wave energy in time to cancel the noise at the source.

High speed digital signal processors weren't around then and they gave us the speed needed to cancel the sound in the 80's.

I drove a Ford Taurus with an electronic muffler for 6 months as my personal "test" car. Straight through exhaust with a rugged speaker box at the exhaust outlet. It had a dash switch that allowed me to turn the electronics on and off at will.

Imagine the stares I got when playing with that switch in traffic.

BTW, noise cancellation had it roots in England. Some of our intellectual property came from there, as did our acoustics genus, Owen Jones.

Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Large hole formally occupied by furry woodland creature.
Posts: 3385
Good Answers: 97
#7
In reply to #6

Re: Hyping Active Noise Reduction

06/19/2010 12:23 PM

It was one of those experiences that you never forget, like an acoustic "blanket".

Strange.

Considering the British roots in microwave technology, It is not surprising the audio spectrum would be involved as well.

Thanks.

__________________
CRTL-Z
Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
Hobbies - CNC - New Member Popular Science - Biology - New Member Hobbies - Musician - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 3523
Good Answers: 146
#2

Re: Hyping Active Noise Reduction

05/10/2010 5:36 AM

Darlington makes a good point - if a 20 dB noise reduction is marketed as 99% on the basis of reduction in energy, there's no room on the scale to highlight the improvement of a system with 40 dB noise reduction.

The loudness reduction calculation that he proposes, though, is a bit oversimplified. If you're going to get into calculating loudness perception, surely the frequency-specific characteristics have to be addressed? Since perception of loudness is very frequency-specific. Not to mention that each person's hearing will be different.

Analogous products such as professional shielding materials are typically marketed with a graph showing dB attenuation at specific frequencies, just as receivers are marketed with a graph showing reception over frequency. The graph is a real "signature" for the product, which the consumer can measure against perceived performance.

Maybe the marketing answer is not to attempt to simplify by converting to percent, but keep dB ratings, use a graph to display the product performance signature, and make some effort to raise consumer literacy.

Oh and BTW, I love my ANR headphones!

__________________
incus opella
Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United Kingdom - Member - New Member

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harlow England
Posts: 16512
Good Answers: 670
#3

Re: Hyping Active Noise Reduction

05/11/2010 3:49 AM

Marketing guys...
(GA Lynlynch)
Del

__________________
health warning: These posts may contain traces of nut.
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Hyping Active Noise Reduction

05/11/2010 9:07 AM

Thanks. I had lots of fun at that job. Those were the days of lavish travel and no limit expense accounts. Playing with the tank in the California desert was fun, too.

Cheers.

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 7 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

artsmith (1); lyn (3); Unredundant (2); user-deleted-1105 (1)

Previous in Blog: Internet Curves Ahead?   Next in Blog: Treacherous Texting on the Road

Advertisement