|
A
NASA atmospheric scientist has proposed that the agency send an
unmanned, robotic, rocket-powered airplane to Mars, to explore the
Red Planet. He argues that compared to a rover on the surface, an
airplane could cover vastly more territory — about 1,000 miles,
before fuel runs out — and could over-fly some of the most
interesting terrain, which would be inaccessible to ground-based
rovers. It could also take closer, higher-resolution photos than an
orbiter and chemically sample the atmosphere (for plumes of methane,
for example). If you were NASA's administrator, would you give this
project the go-ahead, or opt for a ground-based rover mission?
The preceding article is a "sneak peek" from Sensors & Switches, a newsletter from GlobalSpec. To stay up-to-date and informed on industry trends, products, and technologies, subscribe to Sensors & Switches today.
|
"Almost" Good Answers: