Engineering News Blog

Engineering News

Latest news of interest to engineers. Sourced from GlobalSpec's Engineering News

Previous in Blog: This Lens Takes Pictures From Nine Angles at Once to Make a 3D Image   Next in Blog: Ethanol Blamed for Record Food Prices
Close
Close
Close
5 comments

Captured Carbon Can Be Safely Stored Underground: Study

Posted March 23, 2011 8:19 AM

From Fast Company:

Carbon capture and storage (CCS), a technique that captures carbon emissions from industrial and coal-fired plants and buries them underground, is understandably controversial. Researchers have in the past shown that the ultra-expensive technique could leak carbon into groundwater aquifers, making the water undrinkable. And there is the ever-present problem of what happens if all the pressurized carbon stored underground is disturbed and, say, gets released back into the air. But now scientists at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory claim that large-scale underground storage is safer than previously thought.

Read the whole article

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Comments rated to be Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive ratings to make them "good answers".
2
Power-User
Canada - Member - New Member

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 128
Good Answers: 8
#1

Re: Captured Carbon Can Be Safely Stored Underground: Study

03/23/2011 10:42 PM

Pfffft Goes Promise of Pumping C02 Underground
http://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2011/01/12/PromiseOfPumpingCO2/
Farmers say high profile carbon sequestration experiment is a bubbling, dangerous failure.
By Andrew Nikiforuk, 12 Jan 2011, TheTyee.ca
Canada's poster child for so-called clean energy and "the world's first CO2 Measurement, Monitoring and Verification Initiative" may have sprung a serious leak in Saskatchewan.
And it's the sort of geological and political disclosure that just might unravel plans to spend billions of taxpayers' dollars on constructing elaborate carbon cemeteries across the country, if not the world.
The story, which includes explosions, dead animals, and an international cast of characters, also raises some critical questions about transparency and the quality of government regulation in a carbon-centric economy.
Nearly a decade ago, the Paris-based International Energy Agency linked up with the Petroleum Technology Research Centre (PTRC) in Regina, Saskatchewan to study the Weyburn oilfield as a perfect model graveyard for greenhouse gases. It lies underneath 50,000 acres of flat farmland.
At the time EnCana Corporation (now Cenovus Energy) had started to flood the aging crude field with gallons of salt water and tonnes of CO2 piped from a North Dakota coal gasification plant nearly 320 miles away.
Carbon dioxide, an atmospheric climate warmer and ocean acidifier, simply coaxed more oil from the reservoir and enhanced production rates. Much of the CO2 also stayed in the reservoir.
As a consequence the IEA, the U.S. government, Alberta Research Council and 20 industrial firms -- including Cenovus -- spent more than $40 million to monitor what would become the world's largest demonstration project for storing carbon underground.
MORE:
http://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2011/01/12/PromiseOfPumpingCO2/

= = = = = =

Sask. farmers worried about CO2 leaks
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/saskatchewan/story/2011/01/11/sk-carbon-complaint-1101.html
Last Updated: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 The Canadian Press
A Saskatchewan farm couple say greenhouse gases that were supposed to be stored permanently underground are leaking out, killing animals and sending groundwater foaming to the surface like shaken-up soda pop.
Cameron and Jane Kerr, who own land above the Weyburn oilfield in eastern Saskatchewan, have released a consultant's report that claims to link high concentrations of carbon dioxide in their soil to gas injected underground every day.
Energy giant Cenovus injects 8,000 tonnes of the gas every day in an attempt to enhance oil recovery and fight climate change.
- - - -SNIP - - - -
A consultant found high concentrations of carbon dioxide in the soil that matches the carbon dioxide Cenovus has been injecting, he says.
The Saskatchewan NDP government had agreed to conduct a year-long study to find out what was going on, but that hasn't happened since the government changed in 2007.
The suggestion that the Weyburn capture-and-storage project might be leaking could have implications for similar projects that try to store carbon underground, a technique being studied around the world with billions of dollars of public financing.

= = = = = = =

CO2 Levels at Leaking Canadian Carbon Storage Project Could Asphyxiate You In One Place
http://www.treehugger.com/files/2011/01/co2-levels-leaking-canadian-carbon-storage-project-asphyxiate-you.php
by Matthew McDermott, New York, NY 01.12.11 Science & Technology
Some more on the leaking carbon sequestration project in Canada that has killed farm animals, and caused all sorts of strange problems for farmers Cameron and Jane Kerr. A new piece in The Tyee fills in some of the background details and the current situation. All of it highlights the serious questions that remain about CCS projects and calls into doubt the continue support by politicians and polluters who seemingly hold out hope for the climate change mitigation technology. Here's what's going on in Saskatchewan:
Going back to 2004, the Kerrs began noticing some leaks. This is shortly after both the IEA and the Petroleum Technology Research Centre claimed that there were no leaks in the Weyburn field CO2 storage project, which now stores more than 17 million metric tons of CO2 and is the world's largest geologic carbon sequestration project. Since that time the public monitoring data on the project "appears to have disappeared."
A year earlier, the Kerrs observed strange things happening in a gravel pit, which promptly filled with water after being dug--the water started hissing bubbles, foaming, and becoming discolored. Ducks, rabbits and nearby goat died. In 2007 the pond exploded.
The provincial government promised to do a year-long study, but never did. Which prompted the Kerrs to undertake the study, which Eco-Justice and others helped with and was released yesterday.
Here's the really scary part:
In one location alone [Paul Lafleur, of Petro-Find Geochem] detected concentrations as high as 110,607 parts per million (ppm), twice the amount needed to asphyxiate a person. Near the Kerr's home he also recorded concentrations of 17,000 ppm, a level "that far exceed the threshold level for health concerns." As a consequence "CO2 could enter the home in dangerous concentrations through the crawl space due to negative pressures caused by a natural gas heating furnace."
Given that Cenovus's closest injection well lies a mile away from the Kerr home, Lafleur concluded that the CO2 was probably seeping through open fractures and faults that intersect the Weyburn field. In other words, there were cracks in the [carbon] cemetery.
In addition a Saskatchewan lab confirmed that the CO2 found at Kerr's place clearly originated from "the CO2 injected into the Weyburn reservoir."
http://www.treehugger.com/files/2011/01/co2-levels-leaking-canadian-carbon-storage-project-asphyxiate-you.php

More on Carbon Capture & Storage:
Canadian Carbon Sequestration Project Leaking, Killing Farm Animals & Causing Algae Blooms
Carbon Capture And Storage Will Happen - Here's Why We Should Support It
Leaking Underground Carbon Storage Schemes Could Contaminate Drinking Water Aquifers
Will Carbon Capture & Storage (CCS) Conflict With Mineral & Property Rights?

Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Power-User

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: South Texas
Posts: 116
Good Answers: 3
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Captured Carbon Can Be Safely Stored Underground: Study

03/24/2011 1:43 AM

EasyWay, that is a well-documented commentary and well presented, definitely worth the GA. This is just another example of how big a fool Man can make of himself when he chases money with no regard for consequences. We face rising populations needing to be fed with a fixed acreage of land resources, and they have the nerve to create a dangerous environment while trying to sequester the gas on which the entire planetary food supply depends. Show me a single source of food that did not come from photosynthesis. Yes, CO2 needs to be managed, but subterranean sequestration is not even a part of the solution.

A much better solution is the "Bubblers" that have been proposed to use the power plant emissions to feed algae with a high protein content that are then harvested for food. If the protein is extracted for further processing, Infinite Renewable Energy, Inc. can use the polysaccharides in the residue to make fuel ethanol. The CO2 from the ethanol production can be put to use as a good refrigerant in a closed system, if you want some kind of sequestration.

__________________
Just because it has a patent doesn't mean it is the best solution. Just because it has no patent doesn't mean it won't work. A patent is only a license to litigate.
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 705
Good Answers: 32
#5
In reply to #2

Re: Captured Carbon Can Be Safely Stored Underground: Study

07/13/2011 1:46 PM

All the more reason that processes that use a form of combustion to produce electricity should be able to capture the CO2 and utilize it in a algae growing or agricultural process to produce a lipid-oil product or a biomass for further use as either a feed stock for ethanol or used directly for other purposes which in itself would not emit additional CO2.

One also wonders what would eventually happen if we simply could put all that CO2 down into the Oceans or underground in the name of "Carbon sequestration". Has anyone calculated what that will do to the oxygen in the environment? After all, for every carbon atom you sequester in the form of CO2, you sequester 2 oxygen atoms.

Like in the song, the air up here could get rarefied.

Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think that we should be worried about the C so much as the CO2. People who get on this subject seem to think that it's the C we have to commit back into the ground whereas it's the CO2 that forms the Global Warming issue and not the atomic C.

As long as we don't blow ourselves back into the Caveman era we are going to have forms of combustion, internal combustion or power generation combustion. So either we break out the woolies, read by solar powered candles and pedal our way to work or we come up with real solutions on how to "harvest" the CO2 and put it to work like nature does, growing things.

__________________
Spinco
Reply
Guru

Join Date: May 2008
Location: Aggieland, Texas
Posts: 722
Good Answers: 8
#3

Re: Captured Carbon Can Be Safely Stored Underground: Study

03/24/2011 5:10 AM

Let's see, we (mankind) have polluted the air, the seas, and now it's time to pollute the inside of the earth. There is a better solution. Use processes that don't have the CO2 emission problem even though they may cost more. We either pay now or later.

Have some fun today,

PAPADOC

RMFR

Reply
Guru
Hobbies - DIY Welding - Wannabeabettawelda

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Annapolis, Maryland
Posts: 7870
Good Answers: 452
#4

Re: Captured Carbon Can Be Safely Stored Underground: Study

03/24/2011 11:34 AM

Yes, it's called coal.

Grow great expanses of peat. Allow it to become very thick then compacted and then subduct it under a plate.

Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Reply to Blog Entry 5 comments
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Comments rated to be Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive ratings to make them "good answers".
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Brave Sir Robin (1); Easyway (1); Ethanolics Unanimous (1); PAPADOC (1); Spinco (1)

Previous in Blog: This Lens Takes Pictures From Nine Angles at Once to Make a 3D Image   Next in Blog: Ethanol Blamed for Record Food Prices

Advertisement