Acoustics & Audio Technology Blog

Acoustics & Audio Technology

The Acoustics & Audio Technology Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about speakers and amplifiers, acoustic materials, signal measurement and processing and mobile & handheld devices as used in the audio industry. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: Mobile Phone Data: Private or Not   Next in Blog: Hmmm... No Humming with LEDs
Close
Close
Close
5 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Sound Quality on a Budget

Posted April 21, 2011 8:30 AM by Steve Melito

Years ago, many audiophiles who were tall on taste and short on cash bought Boston Acoustics speakers. The company's A-series didn't last long, but now it's back - and better than ever. As Steve Guttenberg of CNET explains, Boston Acoustics engineers have learned "a lot" since the A series made its debut back in the 1980s. The new A series may not share the same technology as the original, but Guttenberg is bullish on even the A 26 bookshelf model.

"These speakers don't need the assistance of a subwoofer to sound full and rich," he explains, "so they would be a great fit for two-channel home theaters or high-fi use". Then there are the A 360 towers. Priced at $400 apiece (twice as much as the bookshelf model), the A 360s "produced more and deeper bass" with the same high-quality "sound signature". Other worthy A series speakers, according to Guttenberg, are the A 250 ($300) the A23 ($140) and the A 225C ($250).

Components that are common to all A Series speakers include low-loss film capacitors, low-distortion laminated steel cores for the inductors, and five-way gold-plated binding posts. For an audiophile on a budget, however, hefty payments in gold (or even on a plastic credit card) aren't required. So what's your favorite "economy" speaker?

Source: CNET News

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Anonymous Poster #1
#1

Re: Sound Quality on a Budget

04/22/2011 6:24 PM

I'm as interested in the lack of response to this article as I am in the mention of the new technology. It's a testament to how (IMO, of course) audiophiles, as a species are either endangered, are practically extinct. I can't recommend an "economy" speaker. I'm a "cured" audiophile dinosaur -- meaning, in my youth I was attracted to reading "Hi Fidelity and Stereo Review" magazine, as well as other, then current, audio mags. I even bought what I thought were audiophile stereo components. The as I got older, my hearing wasn't so good and I began to lose my zeal for being an "audiophile." I still have the components I purchased in my youth, but due to events in my life I just don't have the drive I once did for audio fidelity. Still, I'm appalled at the lack of interest in good sound by, the current "average" young person. Fascination with technology has overtaken whether or not that technology has led to preserving audio quality. Electronic reproduction has become an instrument of its own. To me its sad. I really wish technology was secondary to substance, but it doesn't feel that way to me.

Another example of this lack of "caring" is the problem of audio synchronization with video in TV/Satellite broadcasting. I find it hard to watch any broadcast that isn't in sync. And very few are in sync. to my sensibilities. I've called and complained to DirecTV AND to the local stations that seem to exhibit the problem. I really don't think anyone cares anymore. And picture pixelation? That is so annoying, too. I just don't remember having so much annoyance with analog TV. And I came in with TV. Being born in the early '50s, I've seen TV develop. Analog had noise problems, but at least when you watched a program in English it didn't look like a Japanese dubbed movie. I can't say the same today.

What has me somewhat puzzled, is, I know there are quite a few CR4ers that aren't spring chickens, by any means. Surely, some of you must have been audiophilers in younger years... no?

Reply Off Topic (Score 4)
Guru
India - Member - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Temporarily at Ashburn, VA
Posts: 2744
Good Answers: 164
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Sound Quality on a Budget

04/23/2011 12:33 AM

A good blog, and a good response. Pray tell...why AP? and why self-inflicted OT?

Born in the protectionist age of India, i and my friends, (genuine audiophiles with great desires not commensurate with depth of pocket), not having access to those goodies of USA and Japan, devoured American HiFi magazines and boned ourselves on the best brands, S/N ratio, watched with awe as Dolby did his noise reduction bit, were somewhat patriotically proud of Bose as he did his magic, went a couple of hundred miles to listen to a Nakamichi cassette deck playing through Phase-linear preamp, Marantz power amp and BO speakers capable of 1000 watts apiece playing pianissimo....ahhh those magical, idyllic days of summer wine

i don't think any of us was a true audiophile, simply because we just didn't have the access to those large concert halls with hundreds of instruments playing with awesome true fidelity. Nevertheless, we enjoyed the beaty of excellent acoustics in the new concert halls here, even playing a string quartet.

i am not that much against mp3 for example, since it allows me to carry all my music with me. A small mp3 player does its bit and my Sennheiser or Audio Technica phones give me enough enjoyment.

i also admire greatly Rolls Royce, Ferrari etc, but drive around in a car which probably costs the same as a hubcap of one of those C'st la vie !

__________________
Nothing worthwhile can ever be taught, it can only be learnt.
Reply Off Topic (Score 4)
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#3

Re: Sound Quality on a Budget

04/23/2011 9:09 AM

Most of my 1980's system is still stored in my prior unsold house (owing to crappy market conditions.) Carver preamp and amp, Nakamichi cassette, Yamaha tuner, Technics turntable, Speakerlab speakers, Panasonic laser disc/CD player.

I'm with Moose: my brother's Boston Acoustics speakers were and are the equal of my Speakerlabs (at least to my ears), and much more economical. I did not care for the Bose rear-reflecting speakers (they sounded too diffuse), but I like their miniaturized revival of acoustic horn technique in the "Wave" series, which I am using now.

Lots of memories....

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 259
Good Answers: 6
#4

Re: Sound Quality on a Budget

04/25/2011 9:17 AM

Mission 780's, but remember to replace the drivers as the originals had a defect that corroded the copper leads to the voice coil.

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: USA, Florida
Posts: 1595
Good Answers: 125
#5

Re: Sound Quality on a Budget

04/29/2011 12:21 PM

The absolute best sounding small system on the market and for the money sans none is the Energy Take system. Google it and check the reviews. I was a sound engineer for a band back in the day and I am very picky on my sound systems.

__________________
An obstacle is something you see when you take your eyes off the goal.
Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 5 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (1); Envelope Guy (1); kvsridhar (1); Tornado (1); WJMFIRE (1)

Previous in Blog: Mobile Phone Data: Private or Not   Next in Blog: Hmmm... No Humming with LEDs

Advertisement