The Real End of Science

Three comments.

1. 'Carl'? As if we all know who Carl is. [Turns out it's Carl Zimmer. Ordinarily a person's whole name is cited when first appearing in an article.]

2. The author of this article, Razib Khan, likes loves habaneros. And that's relevant because...?

3. There is no info given as to whether Carl loves habaneros, or not. So clearly this whole thing is incomplete.

The latest increase in fraud can easily be attributed to the Nonsense Science around Global Warming/Climate Change.

Science lives, but the way it is presented is what kills our perception.

In the end there is only so many true scientists with the vision and abilty to pursue science at its best. And they will do it, but we probably missing the chance to ever give all of them credit to what they do since maybe not be seen nor heard.

Mainstream science is what is presented. True science is being done.

And if science is people we will always have it as long there is people.

_{Did I miss the deep cognitive implications?}

Science lives, but the way it is presented is what kills our perception.

Speaking of which, the media are partly to blame.....

Discussion on the movie "The core".

The media form a lot of our perception. Yes they are to blame. The same are we if we do not keep an inch of our own perceptivity alive.

If science were to be envisioned as a 16+ year long formal education, we are still in the first day of preschool...imo