Fastening, Joining & Assembly Blog

Fastening, Joining & Assembly

The Fastening, Joining and Assembly Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about fasteners and hardware, design for assembly, adhesives and sealants, and welding and joining technologies. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: How to Fine-tune Robots for Maximum Benefit   Next in Blog: Wake Up and Use the Robots
Close
Close
Close
Rate Comments: Nested

PLCopen — Bridging PLC, Motion Control, and Robotics

Posted May 03, 2014 12:00 AM by Engineering360 eNewsletter

Robots are being introduced to a growing variety of automated assembly operations, so it is more important than ever to consider how to integrate them. One of the difficulties is that the PLCs, which run the overall system logic, robotics, and motion controllers, each have their own proprietary programming languages. This forces designers to learn a unique set of languages for each project - and the software is usually not oriented to coordinating different kinds of devices. PLCopen Part 4 addresses these issues with an open source standard that supports uniform code for combining these systems.


Editor's Note: This news brief was brought to you by the Fastening, Joining & Assembly eNewsletter. Subscribe today to have content like this delivered to your inbox.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: North West England
Posts: 1170
Good Answers: 153
#1

Re: PLCopen — Bridging PLC, Motion Control, and Robotics

05/04/2014 1:59 AM

One of the main ways of selling PLCs at present is locking in clients to your brand by having a unique language that the client's engineers are forced to "learn" with the initial project. For a new open source language to be successful you need to get 2 or 3 of the largest players on board. There is no incentive for them to support a language that allows the next project to go to one of their rivals. Linux is the best example of the degree of penetration that is achievable by a comparable open source language without corporate backing.

The "learn" is in inverted comma's because in my experience (UK) few end users train their staff adequately to maintain in house equipment. Brand loyalty is more often associated with a reduction in spares inventory.

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry

Previous in Blog: How to Fine-tune Robots for Maximum Benefit   Next in Blog: Wake Up and Use the Robots

Advertisement