Environmental Technology Blog

Environmental Technology

The Environmental Technology Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about refuse and recycling, pollution control solutions, hazardous waste and remediation, and environmental sensors. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: In[visibile] Pollution   Next in Blog: A Look at Drycleaning
Close
Close
Close
9 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Xmas Tree Throwdown: Real vs. Fake

Posted December 24, 2014 7:50 AM by HUSH
Pathfinder Tags: Christmas green sustainable tree

Christmas trees are fickle ornaments. Everyone has their own personal preference about how it needs to appear and how it should be presented. I grew up with artificial trees because my mom was a neat-freak and didn't want to pick up pine needles. So my girlfriend wasn't particularly happy with our first Christmas tree, as it was the incumbent 4-feet-tall, artificial tree from my days as a bachelor. I purchased a tree that I'd be familiar with. Eventually we moved on to a real tree, but it took some time for me to get over my festive tradition of fighting squirrels to the get Christmas tree box down from the attic.

People just like to keep traditions traditional, and there is nothing wrong with celebrating the holiday season with nostalgic customs of the past. It's simply a matter of comfort and feeling at home. It also depends on the individual--I'm a bit more indifferent to Christmas than most. Therefore, it was much easier for me to let go of my tree traditions than my more Christmas infatuated better-half.

So even minor changes to traditions can ruffle people's feathers. And when you add-in some buzz words like "genetic engineering" and "sustainability," people suddenly get very protective about a plant that's been harvested specifically so they can kill it. See, the environmental effects of Christmas trees are still a topic of much debate. On the surface, the widespread timber of Christmas trees for holiday vanity seems ecological irresponsible, but some organizations maintain that any effects are negligible or perhaps even positive.

In 2009 Montreal-based Ellipsos, an environmental consulting firm, determined that (at least in south Quebec) an artificial tree would need to be used for 20 years before qualifying as a more sustainable alternative to the real thing. Each region has different variables that determine what type of tree is more efficient. Take California for example, where tree crops have been severely inhibited by several years of drought, and the "thousands of gallons of water" it takes to raise a Christmas tree could be used for more critical applications.

First, artificial trees are predominantly manufactured in China, as coal-powered electricity and few manufacturing regulations makes it likely each tree has a significant carbon footprint. Fake tree production often includes PVC, a well-noted carcinogen. Few artificial trees have lifespans beyond ten years, and old trees end up in landfills.

Conversely, real trees are easily disposed of and have many uses beyond decorating. Many trees are turned into compost, and municipalities will also use them in civil projects to prevent beach and shore erosion. These trees are principally Douglas fir and Fraser fir trees in North America, and are harvested after five years of cultivation. These trees are often grown on underutilized acreage that isn't suitable for other crops. Real trees have a significantly lower carbon foot print: a natural tree generates 3.1 kg of greenhouse gases, while a fake tree generates 8.1 kg per year. Consider that a real tree regenerates atmospheric oxygen and has a much short shipping distance. Some trees include the roots so they can be planted afterwards, and perhaps used as an Xmas tree the next year.

Perhaps the only drawbacks to real trees are the pesticides, herbicides, fungicides and fertilizers used to cultivate the tree. Trees are harbors for pests and mold, and the toxins may cause cancer in the workers who grow and harvest the trees. Fertilizers can run-off into nearby streams, polluting community water supplies. Obviously, these risks are well-managed, but they remain important issues. Currently, tree breeders are grafting different tree types and engaging in genetic sequencing to determine the genetic codes for ideal tree characteristics. Eventually, GMO trees could create toxin-free trees, providing a clearly sustainable choice.

Fake trees outnumber real trees in American homes 5-to-3. There will always be a need for fake trees due to allergies and pets, but perhaps we're on the verge of a return to traditions past, where people opt for real trees over fake ones. Some people will get mad that they can't buy all-silver, half Christmas trees, but those people have terrible taste anyway. As long as we don't go back to candles on the tree, I'm all for this change.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
Hobbies - CNC - New Member Hobbies - DIY Welding - New Member Engineering Fields - Electromechanical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 23647
Good Answers: 420
#1

Re: Xmas Tree Throwdown: Real vs. Fake

12/24/2014 10:01 AM

If it was up to me, which it usually is, I would have none, otherwise real, or fake. Depends on my girlfriends taste.

or if there are kids involved.

__________________
“ When people get what they want, they are often surprised when they get what they deserve " - James Wood
Reply
Guru
Hobbies - DIY Welding - Don't Know What Made The Old Title Attractive... Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United States - US - Statue of Liberty - 60 Year Member

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Yellowstone Valley, in Big Sky Country
Posts: 7425
Good Answers: 295
#2

Re: Xmas Tree Throwdown: Real vs. Fake

12/24/2014 10:11 AM

Fake Rolex watch.
Fake turkey bacon.
Fake Christmas tree.

However... I have always lived where evergreen trees grow. I have never lived more than one floor above ground level. Disposal of the tree after the first of the year has never been a problem. If these (and other factors that make a real tree easy for me) were not the case, an artificial Christmas tree would be a very attractive and sensible alternate.

There is a 7 foot Grand Fir in my living room right now. The aroma from the tree that fills the house can't be artificially produced satisfactorily.

__________________
Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
Reply
Guru
Hobbies - CNC - New Member Hobbies - DIY Welding - New Member Engineering Fields - Electromechanical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 23647
Good Answers: 420
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Xmas Tree Throwdown: Real vs. Fake

12/24/2014 10:49 AM

Growing up on a farm, we always went into our woods and cut a tree down. Balsam. It was always fun teasing dad. Why does this tree always look better when it's 40 feet up, then after you cut it down?

It always took at least 4 trees we cut down before we found one exceptable.... And it was only exceptable because we either got tired or ran out of jokes about it.

__________________
“ When people get what they want, they are often surprised when they get what they deserve " - James Wood
Reply
Guru
Hobbies - DIY Welding - Don't Know What Made The Old Title Attractive... Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United States - US - Statue of Liberty - 60 Year Member

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Yellowstone Valley, in Big Sky Country
Posts: 7425
Good Answers: 295
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Xmas Tree Throwdown: Real vs. Fake

12/24/2014 11:06 AM

When my kids were small, we would make a day of getting a tree.

Pick an area, start a fire, get the water going for some hot cocoa with marshmallows... sledding, a few snow people, snow angels by the dozen, all the while an eye out for the perfect tree. When discovered it was sawn down, trimmed to size, cleaned up and taken to our house to be cared for.

Fond memories... yeah, I'll probably continue to desire a real tree for quite a while.

__________________
Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
Reply
Guru
Hobbies - CNC - New Member Hobbies - DIY Welding - New Member Engineering Fields - Electromechanical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 23647
Good Answers: 420
#5
In reply to #4

Re: Xmas Tree Throwdown: Real vs. Fake

12/24/2014 3:28 PM

Our hot chocolate was when we got home...we had a very large woods, we only had 120 acres in that woods, but the woods itself was approx. 2-3 square miles. With some low lands (Swampy) Dad always got us lost, so I thought at the time, but now I think it was just a little payback for us kids teasing him. Because he would always leads us out in time for hot chocolate and just before the evening chores on the farm.

So we can share our adventure with mom over hot chocolate.

where dad would now get teased by mom.

like where's the tree?

__________________
“ When people get what they want, they are often surprised when they get what they deserve " - James Wood
Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Construction Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Civil Engineering - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Hobbies - Hunting - New Member Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United States - Member - New Member Hobbies - DIY Welding - New Member

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Latitude 38.701979 Longitude -90.439540 Coordinates 38.701979, -90.439540 N38°42.11874, W090°26.3724
Posts: 668
Good Answers: 15
#6

Re: Xmas Tree Throwdown: Real vs. Fake

12/25/2014 8:04 AM

I no ;longer put one up.
But as a kid we had a very shiny Aluminum looking tree with a spotlight that had multi color capabilities.
I Like the real trees because you don't have to store them the rest of the year. But they do leave a mess of needles.

__________________
scotchdrnkr
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 633
Good Answers: 13
#7

Re: Xmas Tree Throwdown: Real vs. Fake

12/25/2014 9:23 AM

An arborist friend of mine puts Christmas lights on a roughly 60' elm near his house, as it's on a hill, it can be seen from a distance of 10 miles or so. So far it's just been about half and not in the Christmas tree shape, but I guess it's in the 'spirit of Christmas'.

After watching the way real 'Christmas' trees dry out and burst into a fireball when lit, I would recommend using the 'artificial' type or decorating outside.

Reply
Guru

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Placerville, CA (38° 45N, 120° 47'W)
Posts: 6215
Good Answers: 248
#8
In reply to #7

Re: Xmas Tree Throwdown: Real vs. Fake

12/25/2014 12:43 PM

Real Christmas trees only dry out if not properly handled. The most important part of that is getting the base of the tree in water within an hour or two of harvesting, and keeping it watered. We usually keep our tree up for around three weeks, and it's still flexible and not losing many needles when we finally take it down.

I understand that not everyone has the luxury of living in a place where you can easily drive to a farm or forest to harvest a tree, but that had a considerable influence when we chose where to live, so we can. ...not that we specifically had Christmas trees in mind when we chose our location; we just like to be where there are lots of trees, and we like it cool, so we chose to live at a little higher altitude, which brings us close to pines and firs.

If one must buy a real tree from a store or lot, then the most important thing is to make a new cut at the base of the tree and immediately get it into water. To leave the tree mounted on the crossed boards is either really lazy or just plain stupid.

When I can no longer go to harvest at least a small real tree, I'll be an old man!

__________________
Teaching is a great experience, but there is no better teacher than experience.
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#9

Re: Xmas Tree Throwdown: Real vs. Fake

12/25/2014 7:37 PM

Real. Grew up on a farm and we cut our own.

Now, in the city with 3 boys, they pick one out that we buy at the local nursery and the boys decorate it.

I see nothing wrong with cutting trees. They do grow new ones.

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 9 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

dkwarner (1); Doorman (2); geraldpaxton (1); lyn (1); phoenix911 (3); scotchdrnkr (1)

Previous in Blog: In[visibile] Pollution   Next in Blog: A Look at Drycleaning

Advertisement