Alternative & Renewable Energy Blog Blog

Alternative & Renewable Energy Blog

The Alternative & Renewable Energy Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about solar power; fuel cells and hydrogen cells; biofuels such as ethanol; wind, water and geothermal energy; and anything else related to renewable power generation. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: Microgrids – Nation’s Future towards Clean Energy   Next in Blog: Wind Energy – Cost-effective Renewable Energy Solution
Close
Close
Close
3 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Two Fuels, One Algae

Posted March 03, 2015 9:11 PM by Chelsey H

An algal species cultivated for fish food can also be harvested for the co-production of two biofuels. Different components from the Isochrysis species were isolated by researchers from Western Washington University, WA, and Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, MA. Fatty acid methyl esters were converted into biodiesel while another fatty constituent unique to haptophytic algae - long-chain alkenones - were transformed into jet fuel. While the olefin metathesis conversion technology isn't economically viable at current feedstock costs, the researchers hope that scaling up fuel production and commercializing other co-products from algae will improve commercialization prospects.


Editor's Note: This news brief was brought to you by the Alternative & Renewable Energy eNewsletter. Subscribe today to have content like this delivered to your inbox

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
Safety - Hazmat - New Member United States - US - Statue of Liberty - New Member Engineering Fields - Chemical Engineering - Old Hand

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 14331
Good Answers: 162
#1

Re: Two Fuels, One Algae

03/05/2015 9:50 AM

As I recall, the olefin metathesis step to break the alkenones into jet fuel requires an expensive Ruthenium catalyst, but not as expensive as some other catalyst might be. I think this is really big technology, and I hope the growth rate of this organism can be accelerated in some fashion without messing it up.

To think a fellow might grow his own fuel in his back yard is still a little bit out of the question, although in a pinch (SHTF scenario), this might also work in some fashion, but he would have to gain expertise in algae pyrolysis/gasification? In the scenario, no ruthenium allowed or available.

__________________
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Just build a better one.
Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 373
Good Answers: 2
#2

Re: Two Fuels, One Algae

03/05/2015 12:47 PM

Unless there has been a dramatic DNA level change in the last couple of years, my recollection is that while photon utilization by chlorophyll in the total metabolism of algae is very efficient, the best that can be achieved with intense cultivation intervention in energy convertible photon to biomass production is well under 5 per cent.

I would welcome being informed of solid data showing a much higher conversion rate, somewhere in the real world of solar thermal or PV efficiency with various chemical charge storage systems looped in.

Reply
Guru
Safety - Hazmat - New Member United States - US - Statue of Liberty - New Member Engineering Fields - Chemical Engineering - Old Hand

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 14331
Good Answers: 162
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Two Fuels, One Algae

03/05/2015 1:23 PM

Solar efficiency is less of a concern that the general biomass productivity and value product yield attainable in a given land area, since this is essentially agricultural in nature, and all it has to do is compete favorably with cereal grain production. Algae are already known to produce far more mass per acre whatever the production layout than cereal grains. The potential to produce large quantities of fuel in this manner should not be so easily passed over, as the primary barrier is mainly related to production costs associated with capital expenditure, with the minor costs in maintenance and energy costs of production and harvesting.

If the CAPEX of comparable amounts of solar power and algae fuel energy (as transportable fuel) is higher than the algae production, then it seems clear to go with the algae, but if the converse is true, then solar power could be utilized to make fuels from seawater using Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (after the added cost of converting the electricity gets thrown in). Otherwise one is counting on solar power just as an electron source for re-charging e-cars.

__________________
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Just build a better one.
Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 3 comments

Previous in Blog: Microgrids – Nation’s Future towards Clean Energy   Next in Blog: Wind Energy – Cost-effective Renewable Energy Solution

Advertisement