The Engineer's Notebook Blog

The Engineer's Notebook

The Engineer's Notebook is a shared blog for entries that don't fit into a specific CR4 blog. Topics may range from grammar to physics and could be research or or an individual's thoughts - like you'd jot down in a well-used notebook.

Previous in Blog: Are You A Workaholic?   Next in Blog: The Latest Tech for Sharkproofing Beaches
Close
Close
Close
4 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Coral Bleaching

Posted June 03, 2016 12:07 PM by BestInShow
Pathfinder Tags: bermuda coral bleaching sunscreen

Snorkeling along part of Bermuda's coral reef was one of the highlights of my recent trip to the island. Given the dire state of corals around the world, spending a little time amongst robustly healthy corals, and the resident fish, was a pleasure and a privilege. Why is Bermuda's reef in such good shape? Why are others, from the Great Barrier Reef to locations in the Florida Keys, dying? What, if anything, can we do to save what's left? Big questions, and articles abound that describe problems and potential solutions.

Rather than regurgitate a summary of the plethora of virtual ink dedicated to coral, I'll look at one less-obvious stressor of coral ecosystems. I'll also look at some ideas for coral restoration and ways to prevent further damage.

Coral Bleaching: Symptom of Stress

This year's El Nino event sparked the biggest coral die-off since 1998's El Nino. Pictures of swaths of bleached Great Barrier reef coral - estimated at one-third of the entire reef - show up with dismaying frequency. A number of news outlets published stories as I was writing this post. This phenomenon occurs when stressed corals expel the algae, called zooxanthellae, that live symbiotically within coral tissues. The algae are the coral animal's major food source, as well as the source of its color. NOAA's infographic below demonstrates this process. Soft corals are particularly prone to bleaching.

Infographic: NOAA

Stressors: Obvious and Not-So-Obvious

Those of you who are reading this can undoubtedly list some obvious anthropogenic environmental stressors.

  • Global warming and increased ocean temperature
  • Changes in ocean water chemistry - salinity levels and acidity
  • Pollution from waste runoff
  • Heat pollution from power plant cooling water discharge
  • Overexposure to humans via recreational scuba diving
  • Overfishing and use of destructive fishing methods
  • Loss of fish which clean seaweed from reefs

An additional and more subtle culprit is the chemicals in most sunscreens. The oldest research I found in a cursory web search is an from Environmental Health Perspectives published in 2008, "Sunscreens Cause Coral Bleaching by Promoting Viral Infections." The role of sunscreen hasn't gotten much attention until this latest episode of massive bleach-outs, though. At the time of publication, the authors estimated that 4,000 to 6,000 metric tons of sunscreen washes off swimmers in oceans worldwide. The more swimmers and divers cluster around reefs, the higher the concentration of washed-off Coppertone. And even a vanishingly small amount of the bad stuff can wreak havoc. Ironic that the stuff that protects humans from sunburn and skin damage helps cause coral to lose color and die.

The sunscreen chemicals that cause damage are paraben, a preservative; cinnamate and a camphor derivative, UVB blockers; and benzophenone, a UVA blocker. These chemicals do their dirty work by causing dormant viruses in coral's symbiotic algae

to wake up and replicate, eventually causing the algae to explode. The explosion propels the viruses into surrounding seawater where they can infect other corals. There is also evidence that chemicals alter the DNA of juvenile coral polyps, causing deformities and unviability.

Sunscreens with non-chemical UV blockers don't harm coral - at least, as far as we know today. These non-chemical blockers are our old friends zinc oxide, the stuff lifeguards paint on their noses, and titanium dioxide. Together these provide broad spectrum protection. A lot of websites advertise reef-safe and reef-friendly sunscreens and sunblocks.

An Aside about European Sunscreens

Recently I'd read that European and Australian scientists have access to much more effective sunblocking chemicals that are unavailable to those of us in the US. The story of why they are unavailable, despite 20 years' worth of user data demonstrating their safety and effectiveness, is too long for this post. Suffice it to say that testing takes money, either from the FDA or the product manufacturer, and evidently no one's interested enough to pony up.

I wondered if these FDA-banned ingredients are safer for coral than the three UV blockers listed above. I was thinking hey, not only are US citizens unnecessarily deprived of more effective sunscreens, we're also killing coral. Sure enough, as far as we know, none of the ingredients listed below harm coral or humans, at least not European and Australian humans. To add a touch of irony, a factory in South Carolina manufactures sunscreen with banned ingredients and ships it all to Europe.

  • Tinosorb M (UVA blocker)
  • Mexoryl XL (UVA blocker; SX available in the US but less effective)
  • Uvinul T 150
  • Uvinul A Plus
  • Uvasorb HEB
  • Parsol SLX

Coral Preservation and Growth

Stressed coral dies quickly and in large quantities. However, coral reefs grow agonizingly slowly. Large corals, like brain corals, grow 0.3 to 2 centimeters per year; soft corals, up to 10 centimeters a year. At this rate, a reef takes 10,000 years to form. A large barrier reef or an atoll can take 100,000 to 30 million years to form. Given this timeframe, preservation efforts are far more important than attempts to create new reefs, although there are ongoing efforts to provide structures, like sunken ships, for coral polyps to latch onto. Mr. Best in Show and I saw coral starting to grow on a shipwreck on our snorkeling trip; Bermuda has plenty of wrecked ships, most or all of which ran afoul of the reef.

Individuals can help keep coral healthy by using the right sunscreen and by refraining from touching coral when snorkeling or SCUBA-ing. Creating marine preserves where harmful activities are banned and human access is regulated is mandatory. Bermuda's government has passed laws to protect the island's reefs since the 1600s; this protection is one key factor in Bermuda reef health. Each of the factors leading to reef death can be addressed if enough political and ecological interest exist. For example, restoring populations of reef-cleaning fish directly improves reef health. Diligent monitoring programs, such as those managed by the Bermuda Reef Ecosystem Analysis and Monitoring (BREAM), discover potential threats and can avert significant damage - at least, that's what we hope. Global warming and carbon dioxide levels have already killed irreplaceable swaths of coral world-wide; what the future holds, we can't know.

References

http://coexploration.org/bbsr/coral/html/reef_formation.htm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coral_reef#Formation

http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/education/tutorial_corals/welcome.html

Image credits

Bermuda_attractions.com

NOAA

SEOS

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: by the beach in Florida
Posts: 33392
Good Answers: 1817
#1

Re: Coral Bleaching

06/03/2016 1:57 PM

Another conspiracy theory...? Follow the money....

Sunscreen apocalypse...

__________________
All living things seek to control their own destiny....this is the purpose of life
Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 373
Good Answers: 2
#2

Re: Coral Bleaching

06/04/2016 1:21 PM

Once we get beyond the Triangles and other legends/phenomena of Bermuda, the biodynamics of sargassum in its final resting place centered on Bermuda may be relevant.

Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member Fans of Old Computers - Commodore 64 - New Member Popular Science - Evolution - New Member United States - Member - New Member

Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Illinois, 7 county region (The 'blue dot' that drags the rest of the 'red state' around during presidential elections.)
Posts: 3683
Good Answers: 89
#3

Re: Coral Bleaching

06/06/2016 9:43 AM

That is something new to me. I had thought it was the living coral organisms that gave the coral its color, while the shape came from the calcium 'skeleton' the organisms extruded around them. A filly colored coral was healthy because the colony was alive, a 'bleached' coral was the 'ghost town' of a colony that had died off. I never knew the color came from a separate organism living within the coral colony.

__________________
( The opinions espressed in this post may not reflect the true opinions of the poster, and may not reflect commonly accepted versions of reality. ) (If you are wondering: yes, I DO hope to live to be as old as my jokes.)
Reply
Guru
Safety - Hazmat - New Member United States - US - Statue of Liberty - New Member Engineering Fields - Chemical Engineering - Old Hand

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 14331
Good Answers: 162
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Coral Bleaching

06/08/2016 2:46 PM

I was aware that algae can come in a fairly wide variety of colors. I was also not aware that the algae were responsible for coral colors, but now it makes sense to me.

Had a meatball sub for lunch today, totally groggy now, must hold on until 16:00 arrives. OMG, sleepy.

__________________
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Just build a better one.
Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 4 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

adreasler (1); bullardrr (1); James Stewart (1); SolarEagle (1)

Previous in Blog: Are You A Workaholic?   Next in Blog: The Latest Tech for Sharkproofing Beaches

Advertisement