Challenge Questions Blog

Challenge Questions

Stop in and exercise your brain. Talk about this month's Challenge from Specs & Techs or similar puzzles.

So do you have a Challenge Question that could stump the community? Then submit the question with the "correct" answer and we'll post it. If it's really good, we may even roll it up to Specs & Techs. You'll be famous!

Answers to Challenge Questions appear by the last Tuesday of the month.

Previous in Blog: Infrasound Inquiry: Newsletter Challenge (November 2018)   Next in Blog: The Ol' Bulb Drop: Newsletter Challenge (January 2019)
Close
Close
Close
7 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Superluminal Surprise: Newsletter Challenge (December 2018)

Posted November 30, 2018 5:01 PM

This month's IEEE GlobalSpec Newsletter Challenge is:

A jet of charged particles generated when two neutron stars collide and subsequently collapse into a black hole appears to be traveling faster than the speed of light when viewed from Earth. How is this possible?

And the answer is:

Einstein’s theory of special relativity states that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. So the apparent superluminal velocity of the jet of charged particles is simply an illusion and arises as a result of a trick of perspective. The effect depends on the jet traveling at relativistic speeds (a significant percentage of the speed of light) and is magnified for relatively small angles between the observer’s line of sight and the astronomical event that generated the jet.

Since the light emitted by the jet at each point along its path of travel does not travel much faster than the jet itself, the distance between light emissions at each point appears to be shorter than it would be for a slow jet. From the perspective of Earth, the oldest light emitted by the jet arrives only shortly before the newest light emitted by the jet. Thus, the jet seems to have moved faster than light on its trip to Earth.

For example, consider a distant jet traveling at nearly the speed of light at an angle to Earth so that it has moved about 12 light-years directly toward our planet and about 9 light-years in the transverse direction across the sky. Using trigonometry, the jet has travelled a total distance of around 15 light-years on its path at an angle to Earth.

Consider an emission of light from the jet at the start of its trip. After 15 years, the light has moved 15 light-years. But during that time, the jet has moved 12 light-years toward Earth. So an additional light emission from the jet at the end of its trip lags the original light emission by only 3 light-years.

Consequently, an observer on Earth sees the jet’s entire trip taking place within 3 years. During this time, however, the jet appears to have moved 9 light-years across the sky. This apparent motion of 9 light years happening in the span of 3 years makes it appear that the jet is moving superluminally.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: by the beach in Florida
Posts: 33392
Good Answers: 1817
#1

Re: Superluminal Surprise: Newsletter Challenge (December 2018)

11/30/2018 5:22 PM

They were calculating the speed based on STD's generated by Ralphis....who used moving angles to confuse everybody....

__________________
All living things seek to control their own destiny....this is the purpose of life
Reply
3
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: About 4000 miles from the center of the earth (+/-100 mi)
Posts: 9912
Good Answers: 1141
#2

Re: Superluminal Surprise: Newsletter Challenge (December 2018)

11/30/2018 5:48 PM

From the article:

“We measured an apparent motion that is four times faster than light. That illusion, called superluminal motion, results when the jet is pointed nearly toward Earth and the material in the jet is moving close to the speed of light,” said Kunal Mooley, of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO) and Caltech.

The astronomers observed the object 75 days after the merger, then again 230 days after.

“Based on our analysis, this jet most likely is very narrow, at most 5 degrees wide, and was pointed only 20 degrees away from the Earth’s direction,” said Adam Deller, of the Swinburne University of Technology and formerly of the NRAO. “But to match our observations, the material in the jet also has to be blasting outwards at over 97 percent of the speed of light,” he added.

The scenario that emerged is that the initial merger of the two superdense neutron stars caused an explosion that propelled a spherical shell of debris outward. The neutron stars collapsed into a black hole whose powerful gravity began pulling material toward it. That material formed a rapidly-spinning disk that generated a pair of jets moving outward from its poles.

As the event unfolded, the question became whether the jets would break out of the shell of debris from the original explosion. Data from observations indicated that a jet had interacted with the debris, forming a broad “cocoon” of material expanding outward. Such a cocoon would expand more slowly than a jet.

“Our interpretation is that the cocoon dominated the radio emission until about 60 days after the merger, and at later times the emission was jet dominated,” said Ore Gottlieb, of the Tel Aviv University, a leading theorist on the study."

In other words, we are not seeing an object moving faster than light, but two separate objects, the cacoon and then the jet.

https://public.nrao.edu/news/superfast-jet-neutron-star-merger/

Reply Good Answer (Score 3)
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: by the beach in Florida
Posts: 33392
Good Answers: 1817
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Superluminal Surprise: Newsletter Challenge (December 2018)

11/30/2018 6:25 PM

Ralphis sez...."That's not a proper STD!"

Now that's a STD one can be proud of....

__________________
All living things seek to control their own destiny....this is the purpose of life
Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Optical Engineering - Member Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Member Engineering Fields - Systems Engineering - Member

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Trantor
Posts: 5363
Good Answers: 647
#4

Re: Superluminal Surprise: Newsletter Challenge (December 2018)

12/01/2018 9:04 AM

I'd say Rixter has the proper answer.

Another example of 'superluminal' motion is the apparent motion of glowing gas due to UV radiation. A point source of UV radiation can cause neutral gas to glow, just as the gas around the Pleiades star cluster glows blue due to the UV emissions from the young stars in the cluster. If the UV source is a moving point source, then the glowing spot within the gas also will appear to be moving. The 'movement' of the glowing spot within the gas cloud can be superluminal, even though the gas itself is stationary or moving slowly, and even though the UV point source is moving much slower than the speed of light.

__________________
Whiskey, women -- and astrophysics. Because sometimes a problem can't be solved with just whiskey and women.
Reply
Guru

Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 1746
Good Answers: 87
#5

Re: Superluminal Surprise: Newsletter Challenge (December 2018)

12/04/2018 11:48 AM

I could also see a wavefront crossing a filament of matter with illumination occurring as the wavefront touches the filament. In that case, depending on the geometry, the illumination point could appear to move faster than light or even in several locations at once.

Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Civil Engineering - Member

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: ''but, don't we get PAID to ask questions?...''
Posts: 1661
Good Answers: 17
#6

Re: Superluminal Surprise: Newsletter Challenge (December 2018)

12/04/2018 3:33 PM

Simplistically, if the (conjoined ?) stars were moving away from earth fast enough, and the jet-spue was angled away from Earth at a great enough angle, then it could (seem to) happen...

__________________
''illigitimi non carborundum...''(i.e.: don't let the fatherless (self-deluding,sabotaging, long-term-memory-impaired, knee-jerking, cheap-shotting, mono-syllabic, self-annointed, shadow-lurking, back-biting, off-topic-inquisitors) grind you down...)
Reply
Power-User
Hobbies - Musician - New Member Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member

Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 431
Good Answers: 6
#7

Re: Superluminal Surprise: Newsletter Challenge (December 2018)

12/27/2018 9:35 AM

Apologies for the delay -- the answer is now posted.

__________________
Nobody realizes that some people expend tremendous energy merely to be normal. -Camus
Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 7 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Hannes (1); Jpfalt (1); MR. Guest (1); Rixter (1); SolarEagle (2); Usbport (1)

Previous in Blog: Infrasound Inquiry: Newsletter Challenge (November 2018)   Next in Blog: The Ol' Bulb Drop: Newsletter Challenge (January 2019)

Advertisement